Suppr超能文献

运用发展方法研究学前纪律处分中的种族和社会经济地位差异。

A window into racial and socioeconomic status disparities in preschool disciplinary action using developmental methodology.

机构信息

The School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Institute for Policy Research and Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Evanston, Illinois.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Feb;1508(1):123-136. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14687. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

Abstract

There are large differences in expulsions and suspensions on the basis of race starting in preschool and divergent explanations for their cause. The current study explores how developmental methodology can shed light on this vexing issue. We leverage two measures: (1) childcare provider complaints about children's behavior and their recommended disciplinary action (measured by parent report); and (2) observed disruptive behavior measured by a laboratory-based standardized observation tool, the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS), among a large, sociodemographically diverse sample of children (n   430; mean age   4.79 years). We identified three latent class profiles on the basis of race/socioeconomic status (SES) and found disparities in childcare provider complaints based on profile membership. More specifically, children classified in the Black/Hispanic, poor and Black, nonpoor profiles both had significantly higher childcare provider complaints compared with children in the White/Hispanic, nonpoor profile. By contrast, there were no differences in observed disruptive behavior based on race/SES profiles. Finally, childcare provider complaints in preschool were associated with lower cognitive performance in elementary school, above and beyond observed disruptive behavior in preschool and race/SES profiles. Implications for classroom practice and contributions to the national debate on school disciplinary policies are discussed.

摘要

基于种族的开除和停学差异很大,其原因也存在不同的解释。本研究探讨了发展方法论如何能够阐明这个棘手的问题。我们利用了两种措施:(1)儿童保育提供者对儿童行为的投诉及其建议的纪律处分(通过家长报告衡量);以及(2)通过基于实验室的标准化观察工具——破坏性行为诊断观察时间表(DB-DOS)观察到的破坏性行为,在一个大规模的、社会人口学多样化的儿童样本中(n=430;平均年龄=4.79 岁)。我们根据种族/社会经济地位(SES)确定了三个潜在的类别,并发现了基于类别成员的儿童保育提供者投诉差异。具体而言,与白人/西班牙裔、非贫困类别相比,被归类为黑人/西班牙裔、贫困和黑人、非贫困类别的儿童的儿童保育提供者投诉明显更高。相比之下,基于种族/SES 类别的观察到的破坏性行为没有差异。最后,幼儿园的保育提供者投诉与小学的认知表现降低有关,而与幼儿园的破坏性行为和种族/SES 类别无关。讨论了对课堂实践的影响以及对全国学校纪律政策辩论的贡献。

相似文献

2
Racial Disparities in Elementary School Disciplinary Actions: Findings From the ABCD Study.小学纪律处分中的种族差异:ABCD 研究的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;60(8):998-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
4
Health disparities and gaps in school readiness.健康差异与入学准备方面的差距。
Future Child. 2005 Spring;15(1):117-38. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0002.

本文引用的文献

9
Two strikes: race and the disciplining of young students.双重打击:种族与对青年学生的惩戒
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):617-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797615570365. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验