Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and Program in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4366-4389. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00708. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
Purpose Spoken discourse analysis is commonly employed in the assessment and treatment of people living with aphasia, yet there is no standardization in assessment, analysis, or reporting procedures, thereby precluding comparison/meta-analyses of data and hindering replication of findings. An important first step is to identify current practices in collecting and analyzing spoken discourse in aphasia. Thus, this study surveyed current practices, with the goal of working toward standardizing spoken discourse assessment first in research settings with subsequent implementation into clinical settings. Method A mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) survey was publicized to researchers and clinicians around the globe who have collected and/or analyzed spoken discourse data in aphasia. The survey data were collected between September and November 2019. Results Of the 201 individuals who consented to participate, 189 completed all mandatory questions in the survey (with fewer completing nonmandatory response questions). The majority of respondents reported barriers to utilizing discourse including transcription, coding, and analysis. The most common barrier was time (e.g., lack of time). Respondents also indicated that there was a lack of, and a need for, psychometric properties and normative data for spoken discourse use in the assessment and treatment of persons with aphasia. Quantitative and qualitative results are described in detail. Conclusions The current survey study evaluated spoken discourse methods in aphasia across research and clinical settings. Findings from this study will be used to guide development of process standardization in spoken discourse and for the creation of a psychometric and normative property database. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.166395100.
口语话语分析常用于评估和治疗失语症患者,但评估、分析或报告程序缺乏标准化,从而妨碍了数据的比较/元分析,并阻碍了研究结果的复制。重要的第一步是确定当前在收集和分析失语症口语话语方面的做法。因此,本研究调查了当前的做法,目标是首先在研究环境中实现口语话语评估的标准化,然后再将其纳入临床环境。
一项混合方法(定量和定性)调查向全球范围内收集和/或分析过失语症口语话语数据的研究人员和临床医生进行了宣传。调查数据于 2019 年 9 月至 11 月期间收集。
在 201 名同意参与的人中,有 189 名完成了调查中所有强制性问题(完成非强制性回答问题的人数较少)。大多数受访者报告了在使用话语方面存在障碍,包括转录、编码和分析。最常见的障碍是时间(例如,缺乏时间)。受访者还表示,在失语症评估和治疗中使用口语话语缺乏和需要心理计量学特性和常模数据。详细描述了定量和定性结果。
目前的研究调查评估了研究和临床环境中的失语症口语方法。本研究的结果将用于指导口语话语过程标准化的制定,并创建心理计量学和常模属性数据库。