Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(4):1417-1434. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230844.
Findings from language sample analyses can provide efficient and effective indicators of cognitive impairment in older adults.
This study used newly automated core lexicon analyses of Cookie Theft picture descriptions to assess differences in typical use across three groups.
Participants included adults without diagnosed cognitive impairments (Control), adults diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (ProbableAD), and adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cookie Theft picture descriptions were transcribed and analyzed using CLAN.
Results showed that the ProbableAD group used significantly fewer core lexicon words overall than the MCI and Control groups. For core lexicon content words (nouns, verbs), however, both the MCI and ProbableAD groups produced significantly fewer words than the Control group. The groups did not differ in their use of core lexicon function words. The ProbableAD group was also slower to produce most of the core lexicon words than the MCI and Control groups. The MCI group was slower than the Control group for only two of the core lexicon content words. All groups mentioned a core lexicon word in the top left quadrant of the picture early in the description. The ProbableAD group was then significantly slower than the other groups to mention a core lexicon word in the other quadrants.
This standard and simple-to-administer task reveals group differences in overall core lexicon scores and the amount of time until the speaker produces the key items. Clinicians and researchers can use these tools for both early assessment and measurement of change over time.
语言样本分析的结果可以为老年人认知障碍提供高效、有效的指标。
本研究使用新的自动核心词汇分析对“Cookie Theft”图片描述进行分析,以评估三个组之间的典型用法差异。
参与者包括无诊断认知障碍的成年人(对照组)、被诊断为阿尔茨海默病的成年人(可能 AD 组)和被诊断为轻度认知障碍的成年人(MCI 组)。使用 CLAN 对“Cookie Theft”图片描述进行转录和分析。
结果表明,与 MCI 和对照组相比,可能 AD 组整体使用的核心词汇明显较少。然而,对于核心词汇内容词(名词、动词),MCI 和可能 AD 组生成的词汇明显少于对照组。各组在核心词汇功能词的使用上没有差异。与 MCI 和对照组相比,可能 AD 组产生大多数核心词汇的速度也较慢。MCI 组仅在两个核心词汇内容词上的速度比对照组慢。所有组在描述的早期都在图片的左上象限提到了一个核心词汇。然后,可能 AD 组比其他组提到图片其他象限的核心词汇明显较慢。
这项标准且易于管理的任务揭示了在整体核心词汇得分和说话者产生关键项目所需时间方面的组间差异。临床医生和研究人员可以使用这些工具进行早期评估和随时间变化的测量。