• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论 HEXACO 宜人性(与愤怒相对)与诚实-谦逊的关系。

On the relations between HEXACO agreeableness (versus anger) and honesty-humility.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2021 Dec;62(6):887-894. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12772. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/sjop.12772
PMID:34562027
Abstract

The HEXACO personality factors of Agreeableness-versus-Anger (A) and Honesty-Humility (H) are interpreted as two complementary aspects of reciprocal altruistic tendency. Here we consider several ways of representing the positive associations between the defining traits of A and of H, through common factor analysis of self-report HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) facet scale scores (N ≈ 111,000). We describe orthogonal solutions that differ in the extent to which H facets show secondary loadings on A (and vice versa), as well as an oblique solution compatible with a higher-order "cooperativeness" factor. We discuss the psychological plausibility of these solutions, and we review research showing differential associations of several phenomena or outcomes with A and H. We conclude that the optimal representation of A/H trait associations is not yet known but that the value of separate A and H factor scales is well established.

摘要

宜人性-愤怒(A)和诚实-谦逊(H)的 HEXACO 人格因素被解释为互惠利他倾向的两个互补方面。在这里,我们通过对自我报告的 HEXACO 人格量表修订版(HEXACO-PI-R)方面量表分数(N≈111000)的共同因素分析,考虑了几种表示 A 和 H 的定义特征之间正相关的方法。我们描述了正交解,这些解在 H 方面在多大程度上显示对 A 的次要负荷(反之亦然),以及与更高阶“合作性”因素一致的斜交解。我们讨论了这些解决方案的心理合理性,并回顾了表明与 A 和 H 相关的几种现象或结果的研究。我们得出的结论是,A/H 特征关联的最佳表示形式尚不清楚,但 A 和 H 因子量表的价值是明确的。

相似文献

1
On the relations between HEXACO agreeableness (versus anger) and honesty-humility.论 HEXACO 宜人性(与愤怒相对)与诚实-谦逊的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Dec;62(6):887-894. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12772. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: a review of research and theory.人格特质的 HEXACO 诚实-谦逊、宜人性和情绪性因素:研究和理论述评。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 May;18(2):139-52. doi: 10.1177/1088868314523838. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100.HEXACO-100 的心理测量学特性。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):543-556. doi: 10.1177/1073191116659134. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
How Well Do Big Five Measures Capture HEXACO Scale Variance?大五人格测量与 HEXACO 量表的差异捕捉能力如何?
J Pers Assess. 2019 Nov-Dec;101(6):567-573. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1448986. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
5
Personality and prosocial behavior: linking basic traits and social value orientations.人格与亲社会行为:连接基本特质与社会价值取向
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep;107(3):529-39. doi: 10.1037/a0036074. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure.人格结构的HEXACO模型的实证、理论和实践优势。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):150-66. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294907.
7
The HEXACO Personality Space Before and After Re-Rotation to Approximate the Big Five Dimensions.重新旋转以近似大五人格维度前后的HEXACO人格空间。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Mar-Apr;106(2):145-155. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2229427. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
On Measuring the Sixth Basic Personality Dimension: A Comparison Between HEXACO Honesty-Humility and Big Six Honesty-Propriety.论第六基本人格维度的测量:大六人格中的诚实-谦逊与正直-谨慎的比较。
Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):1024-1036. doi: 10.1177/1073191116638411. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
Sex differences in HEXACO personality characteristics across countries and ethnicities.不同国家和种族中 HEXACO 人格特征的性别差异。
J Pers. 2020 Dec;88(6):1075-1090. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12551. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.