Varović Dorian, Žganjer Kristian, Vuk Saša, Schoenfeld Brad J
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Health Sciences, Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2021 Aug 29;9(9):119. doi: 10.3390/sports9090119.
The study aimed to compare the effects of drop set resistance training (RT) versus traditional RT on markers of maximal muscle strength and regional hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris. Sixteen recreationally active young men had one leg randomly assigned to the drop-set method (DS) and the other to training in a traditional manner (TRAD). Participants performed unilateral seated leg extensions using a periodized approach for eight weeks. Rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscle thickness (MT), estimated one repetition maximum (RM) in the unilateral knee extension, and peak and average isokinetic knee extension torque at 60°/s angular velocity were measured pre- and post-study. Both conditions increased muscle thickness of the RF and VL from pre- to post-intervention. DS showed statistically greater increases in the RF at 30% and 50% of muscle length, whereas no MT differences were detected at 70% muscle length nor at any aspect of the VL. Both DS and TRAD increased estimated one RM from pre- to post-study (+34.6% versus +32.0%, respectively) with no between-condition differences noted. Both conditions showed similar increases in peak torque (DS: +21.7%; TRAD: +22.5%) and average torque (DS: +23.6%; TRAD: +22.5%) from pre- to post-study. Our findings indicate a potential benefit of the drop-set method for inducing non-uniform hypertrophic gains in the RF muscle pursuant to leg extension training. The strategy did not promote an advantage in improving hypertrophy of the VL, nor in strength-related measures, compared to traditional training.
本研究旨在比较递减组抗阻训练(RT)与传统抗阻训练对股四头肌最大肌肉力量指标和局部肥大的影响。16名有运动习惯的年轻男性,一条腿随机分配至递减组训练方法(DS),另一条腿采用传统方式训练(TRAD)。参与者采用周期性训练方法进行单侧坐姿腿伸展训练,为期8周。在研究前后测量股直肌(RF)和股外侧肌(VL)的肌肉厚度(MT)、单侧膝关节伸展的估计1次最大重复量(RM)以及角速度为60°/秒时的峰值和平均等速膝关节伸展扭矩。两种训练方式均使干预前后RF和VL的肌肉厚度增加。DS组在肌肉长度的30%和50%处,RF的增厚在统计学上更显著,而在肌肉长度的70%处以及VL的任何部位均未检测到MT差异。DS组和TRAD组从研究前到研究后估计1RM均增加(分别为+34.6%和+32.0%),组间无差异。两种训练方式从研究前到研究后峰值扭矩(DS组:+21.7%;TRAD组:+22.5%)和平均扭矩(DS组:+23.6%;TRAD组:+22.5%)的增加相似。我们的研究结果表明,在进行腿伸展训练时,递减组训练方法可能有利于在RF肌肉中诱导不均匀的肥大增加。与传统训练相比,该策略在促进VL肥大或与力量相关的指标方面没有优势。