Mullenax Pryse M, Johnson Quincy R, Trevino Michael A, Smith Douglas B, Jacobson Bert H, Dawes J Jay
School of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Aug 1;14(6):815-828. doi: 10.70252/LHKB6773. eCollection 2021.
There is evidence to suggest that aquatic plyometric training (APT) may be an effective and safer alternative to traditional land-based plyometric training (LPT) when training to increase jump performance. The aim of this review was to critically examine the current literature regarding the effects of APT vs. LPT on jump performance in athletic populations. Key terms were employed in five separate databases to complete the current review. Available articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which studies were deemed eligible for review. Outcome measure in these studies included those assessing lower extremity power and jump performance (i.e., drop jumps, broad jumps, sergeant jumps, repeated countermovement jumps, and vertical jumps). All but one of the studies included in this critical review showed significant improvements in jump performance after LPT and APT interventions. Both LPT and APT groups experienced similar increases in jump performance and lower-body power, pre- to post-test, in the majority of the studies examined in this review. LPT and APT have the ability to improve lower extremity explosive strength and jump performance within athletic populations. Improvements in lower body power may improve overall athletic performance. Observations from this review may be used by sport coaches, strength coaches, and athletes alike to weigh the pros and cons of both forms of plyometric training. Observations from this review may also be used to weigh the pros and cons of APT over LPT in terms of reducing risk of injury.
有证据表明，在进行旨在提高跳跃成绩的训练时，水上增强式训练（APT）可能是传统陆上增强式训练（LPT）的一种有效且更安全的替代方法。本综述的目的是严格审查当前有关APT与LPT对运动员群体跳跃成绩影响的文献。在五个独立的数据库中使用了关键词来完成当前的综述。对筛选出的可用文章依据纳入和排除标准进行筛选，以确定哪些研究被认为符合综述要求。这些研究中的结果测量包括评估下肢力量和跳跃成绩的指标（即跳深、立定跳远、军士跳、重复反向运动跳和垂直跳）。在本次批判性综述纳入的研究中，除一项研究外，其他所有研究均表明，LPT和APT干预后跳跃成绩有显著提高。在本综述所考察的大多数研究中，LPT组和APT组在测试前到测试后的跳跃成绩和下肢力量均有相似程度的提高。LPT和APT均有能力提高运动员群体的下肢爆发力和跳跃成绩。下肢力量的提高可能会改善整体运动表现。体育教练、体能教练和运动员等都可以利用本综述的观察结果来权衡两种增强式训练形式的利弊。本综述的观察结果还可用于权衡APT相对于LPT在降低受伤风险方面的利弊。
