Grimmond and Associates, Hamilton, New Zealand
Sustainability West Midlands, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 27;11(9):e046200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046200.
To compare global warming potential (GWP) of hospitals converting from single-use sharps containers to reusable sharps containers (SSC, RSC). Does conversion to RSC result in GWP reduction?
Using BS PAS 2050:2011 principles, a retrospective, before/after intervention quantitative model together with a purpose-designed, attributional 'cradle-to-grave' life-cycle tool, were used to determine the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the two sharps containment systems. Functional unit was total fill line litres (FLL) of sharps containers needed to dispose of sharps for 1-year period in 40 trusts. Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions were included. Results were workload-normalised using National Health Service (NHS) national hospital patient-workload indicators. A sensitivity analysis examined areas of data variability.
Acute care hospital trusts in UK.
40 NHS hospital Trusts using RSC.
Conversion from SSC to RSC. SSC and RSC usage details in 17 base line trusts immediately prior to 2018 were applied to the RSC usage details of the 40 trusts using RSC in 2019.
The comparison of GWP calculated in carbon dioxide equivalents (COe) generated in the manufacture, transport, service and disposal of 12 months, hospital-wide usage of both containment systems in the 40 trusts.
The 40 trusts converting to RSC reduced their combined annual GWP by 3267.4 tonnes COe (-83.9%); eliminated incineration of 900.8 tonnes of plastic; eliminated disposal/recycling of 132.5 tonnes of cardboard and reduced container exchanges by 61.1%. GHG as kg COe/1000 FLL were 313.0 and 50.7 for SSC and RSC systems, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed substantial GHG reductions within unit processes could be achieved, however, their impact on relevant final GWP comparison varied <5% from base comparison.
Adopting RSC is an example of a sustainable purchasing decision that can assist trusts meet NHS GHG reduction targets and can reduce GWP permanently with minimal staff behavioural change.
比较将一次性使用锐器容器转换为可重复使用锐器容器(SSC、RSC)的医院的全球变暖潜能(GWP)。转换为 RSC 是否会导致 GWP 减少?
使用 BS PAS 2050:2011 原则,回顾性地使用前后干预定量模型以及专门设计的归因“摇篮到坟墓”生命周期工具,确定两种锐器容器系统的年度温室气体(GHG)排放量。功能单位为 40 家信托机构在 1 年期间处理锐器所需的总填充线升(FLL)。包括范围 1、2 和 3 的排放量。使用国民保健服务(NHS)全国医院患者工作量指标对结果进行工作量归一化。敏感性分析检查了数据变异性的各个领域。
英国急性护理医院信托。
40 家使用 RSC 的 NHS 医院信托。
从 SSC 转换为 RSC。2018 年前,17 家基线信托的 SSC 和 RSC 使用细节被应用于 2019 年使用 RSC 的 40 家信托的 RSC 使用细节。
比较在制造、运输、服务和处置 12 个月期间产生的二氧化碳当量(COe)中计算的 GWP,以及在 40 家信托机构中使用两种容器系统的医院范围内的使用情况。
转换为 RSC 的 40 家信托机构将其联合年度 GWP 减少了 3267.4 吨 COe(-83.9%);消除了 900.8 吨塑料的焚烧;消除了 132.5 吨纸板的处置/回收,并将容器交换减少了 61.1%。SSC 和 RSC 系统的每 1000 FLL 升 GHG 分别为 313.0 和 50.7 千克 COe。敏感性分析表明,在单元过程中可以实现大量 GHG 减排,但对相关最终 GWP 比较的影响<5%,与基础比较相比变化不大。
采用 RSC 是可持续采购决策的一个例子,可以帮助信托机构达到 NHS GHG 减排目标,并通过最小的员工行为改变永久减少 GWP。