Suppr超能文献

基于传统、补充和整合医学的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)干预措施的随机对照试验:文献计量分析与研究设计综述

Randomized controlled trials of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine-based interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A bibliometric analysis and review of study designs.

作者信息

Ang Lin, Song Eunhye, Lee Myeong Soo

机构信息

Korean Medicine Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Korean Convergence Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Integr Med Res. 2021;10(Suppl):100777. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100777. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains ongoing and continues to affect millions of people worldwide. In the effort of fighting this pandemic, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicines (TCIMs) in engaging COVID-19. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the research trends of TCIMs for COVID-19.

METHODS

Six databases were searched on July 15, 2021, to retrieve all the citations on TCIM-focused randomized controlled trials (RCTs) available on COVID-19. Only RCTs that mentioned at least one TCIMs for the treatment and/or management or COVID-19 were eligible. Data such as number and countries of trials conducted, publication journal, research focus, study design, and sample size were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

The resulting 56 articles were authored by 553 unique authors, and included 28 English articles, 19 Chinese articles with English abstracts, and 9 Chinese articles without English abstract. Analyses had shown that China was the dominant country with TCIM related RCT publications, followed by India and the United States. The included articles were published across 24 English journals and 22 Chinese journals with a wide range of impact factors from 0.220 to 56.272. The most commonly studied TCIM modalities included Chinese herbal decoction (n=12) and Chinese patent medicine (n=16). In terms of study designs, TCIM interventions were integrated with standard medicine across the trials with most trials having a small to medium sample size and open-labeled.

CONCLUSION

This bibliometric analysis of RCTs demonstrated the research trends and characteristics of TCIM utilized in COVID-19 research. Although there are still many research gaps and limitations for pandemic research, the publication of TCIM-focused RCTs is anticipated to show a continuously increasing trend.

摘要

背景

截至目前,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行仍在持续,继续影响着全球数百万人。在抗击这一疫情的过程中,人们对传统、补充和整合医学(TCIMs)在应对COVID-19方面的潜力越来越感兴趣。本研究对TCIMs用于COVID-19的研究趋势进行了文献计量分析。

方法

于2021年7月15日检索了六个数据库,以获取所有关于以TCIMs为重点的COVID-19随机对照试验(RCTs)的文献。只有提及至少一种TCIMs用于治疗和/或管理COVID-19的RCTs才符合条件。提取了所开展试验的数量、国家、发表期刊、研究重点、研究设计和样本量等数据进行分析。

结果

最终得到的56篇文章由553位不同作者撰写,其中包括28篇英文文章、19篇带有英文摘要的中文文章和9篇没有英文摘要的中文文章。分析表明,中国是TCIM相关RCT出版物的主导国家,其次是印度和美国。纳入的文章发表在24种英文期刊和22种中文期刊上,影响因子范围广泛,从0.220到56.272。最常研究的TCIM模式包括中药汤剂(n = 12)和中成药(n = 16)。在研究设计方面,在所有试验中TCIM干预都与标准药物相结合,大多数试验样本量小至中等且为开放标签。

结论

这项对RCTs的文献计量分析展示了COVID-19研究中使用的TCIM的研究趋势和特点。尽管大流行研究仍存在许多研究空白和局限性,但预计以TCIM为重点的RCTs的发表将呈持续增长趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/8528722/987d88b7910a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验