Joyce Caroline M, Saulsgiver Kathryn, Mohanty Salini, Bachireddy Chethan, Molfetta Carin, Steffy Mary, Yoder Alice, Buttenheim Alison M
Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
BetterUp, San Francisco, CA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 30;5(9):e27801. doi: 10.2196/27801.
Smoking rates among low-income individuals, including those eligible for Medicaid, have not shown the same decrease that is observed among high-income individuals. The rate of smoking among pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid is almost twice that among privately insured women, which leads to significant disparities in birth outcomes and a disproportionate cost burden placed on Medicaid. Several states have identified maternal smoking as a key target for improving birth outcomes and reducing health care expenditures; however, efficacious, cost-effective, and feasible cessation programs have been elusive.
This study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a smartwatch-enabled, incentive-based smoking cessation program for Medicaid-eligible pregnant smokers.
Pilot 1 included a randomized pilot study of smartwatch-enabled remote monitoring versus no remote monitoring for 12 weeks. Those in the intervention group also received the SmokeBeat program. Pilot 2 included a randomized pilot study of pay-to-wear versus pay-to-quit for 4 weeks. Those in a pay-to-wear program could earn daily incentives for wearing the smartwatch, whereas those in pay-to-quit program could earn daily incentives if they wore the smartwatch and abstained from smoking. Pilot 3, similar to pilot 2, had higher incentives and a duration of 3 weeks.
For pilot 1 (N=27), self-reported cigarettes per week among the intervention group declined by 15.1 (SD 27) cigarettes over the study; a similar reduction was observed in the control group with a decrease of 17.2 (SD 19) cigarettes. For pilot 2 (N=8), self-reported cigarettes per week among the pay-to-wear group decreased by 43 cigarettes (SD 12.6); a similar reduction was seen in the pay-to-quit group, with an average of 31 (SD 45.6) fewer cigarettes smoked per week. For pilot 3 (N=4), one participant in the pay-to-quit group abstained from smoking for the full study duration and received full incentives.
Decreases in smoking were observed in both the control and intervention groups during all pilots. The use of the SmokeBeat program did not significantly improve cessation. The SmokeBeat program, remote cotinine testing, and remote delivery of financial incentives were considered feasible and acceptable. Implementation challenges remain for providing evidence-based cessation incentives to low-income pregnant smokers. The feasibility and acceptability of the SmokeBeat program were moderately high. Moreover, the feasibility and acceptability of remote cotinine testing and the remotely delivered contingent financial incentives were successful.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209557; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03209557.
低收入人群(包括符合医疗补助条件的人群)的吸烟率并未呈现出与高收入人群相同程度的下降。参加医疗补助的孕妇吸烟率几乎是参加私人保险孕妇的两倍,这导致了出生结果的显著差异,并给医疗补助带来了不成比例的成本负担。几个州已将孕妇吸烟视为改善出生结果和降低医疗保健支出的关键目标;然而,有效、具有成本效益且可行的戒烟项目一直难以实现。
本研究旨在检验一项针对符合医疗补助条件的吸烟孕妇的、基于智能手表且有激励措施的戒烟项目的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
试验1包括一项为期12周的随机试验,比较使用智能手表进行远程监测与不进行远程监测的效果。干预组的参与者还接受了SmokeBeat项目。试验2包括一项为期4周的随机试验,比较按佩戴付费与按戒烟付费的效果。参加按佩戴付费项目的人佩戴智能手表可每日获得激励,而参加按戒烟付费项目的人若佩戴智能手表且戒烟,可每日获得激励。试验3与试验2类似,但激励力度更大,为期3周。
对于试验1(N = 27),干预组在研究期间自我报告的每周吸烟量减少了15.1(标准差27)支;对照组也有类似程度的减少,减少了17.2(标准差19)支。对于试验2(N = 8),按佩戴付费组自我报告的每周吸烟量减少了43支(标准差12.6);按戒烟付费组也有类似程度的减少,平均每周吸烟量减少31(标准差45.6)支。对于试验3(N = 4),按戒烟付费组有一名参与者在整个研究期间戒烟并获得了全部激励。
在所有试验中,对照组和干预组的吸烟量均有所下降。使用SmokeBeat项目并未显著提高戒烟效果。SmokeBeat项目、远程可替宁检测以及远程提供经济激励措施被认为是可行且可接受的。向低收入吸烟孕妇提供基于证据的戒烟激励措施仍面临实施挑战。SmokeBeat项目的可行性和可接受性处于中等偏高水平。此外,远程可替宁检测以及远程提供的有条件经济激励措施的可行性和可接受性取得了成功。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0320955;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03209557 。