Center for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Center for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Excellence in Vascular Biology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2022 Apr;21(4):100153. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100153. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
Mass-spectrometry-enabled ADP-ribosylation workflows are developing rapidly, providing researchers a variety of ADP-ribosylome enrichment strategies and mass spectrometric acquisition options. Despite the growth spurt in upstream technologies, systematic ADP-ribosyl (ADPr) peptide mass spectral annotation methods are lacking. HCD-dependent ADP-ribosylome studies are common, but the resulting MS2 spectra are complex, owing to a mixture of b/y-ions and the m/p-ion peaks representing one or more dissociation events of the ADPr moiety (m-ion) and peptide (p-ion). In particular, p-ions that dissociate further into one or more fragment ions can dominate HCD spectra but are not recognized by standard spectral annotation workflows. As a result, annotation strategies that are solely reliant upon the b/y-ions result in lower spectral scores that in turn reduce the number of reportable ADPr peptides. To improve the confidence of spectral assignments, we implemented an ADPr peptide annotation and scoring strategy. All MS2 spectra are scored for the ADPr m-ions, but once spectra are assigned as an ADPr peptide, they are further annotated and scored for the p-ions. We implemented this novel workflow to ADPr peptides enriched from the liver and spleen isolated from mice post 4 h exposure to systemic IFN-γ. HCD collision energy experiments were first performed on the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos and the Q Exactive, with notable ADPr peptide dissociation properties verified with CID (Lumos). The m-ion and p-ion series score distributions revealed that ADPr peptide dissociation properties vary markedly between instruments and within instrument collision energy settings, with consequences on ADPr peptide reporting and amino acid localization. Consequentially, we increased the number of reportable ADPr peptides by 25% (liver) and 17% (spleen) by validation and the inclusion of lower confidence ADPr peptide spectra. This systematic annotation strategy will streamline future reporting of ADPr peptides that have been sequenced using any HCD/CID-based method.
基于质谱的 ADP-核糖基化工作流程正在迅速发展,为研究人员提供了各种 ADP-核糖基组富集策略和质谱采集选项。尽管上游技术取得了飞速发展,但缺乏系统的 ADP-核糖基(ADPr)肽质谱注释方法。基于 HCD 的 ADP-核糖基组研究很常见,但由于 b/y-离子和 m/p-离子峰的混合物以及代表 ADPr 部分(m-离子)和肽(p-离子)的一个或多个解离事件的 m/p-离子峰,导致 MS2 谱图非常复杂。特别是,进一步解离成一个或多个片段离子的 p-离子可以主导 HCD 谱图,但不能被标准光谱注释工作流程识别。因此,仅依赖于 b/y-离子的注释策略会导致较低的光谱评分,从而减少可报告的 ADPr 肽的数量。为了提高光谱分配的置信度,我们实施了一种 ADPr 肽注释和评分策略。所有 MS2 谱图都对 ADPr m-离子进行评分,但一旦谱图被分配为 ADPr 肽,它们将进一步对 p-离子进行注释和评分。我们将这一新的工作流程应用于从接受全身 IFN-γ 4 小时后分离的小鼠肝脏和脾脏中富集的 ADPr 肽。首先在 Orbitrap Fusion Lumos 和 Q Exactive 上进行 HCD 碰撞能实验,并通过 CID(Lumos)验证了显著的 ADPr 肽解离特性。m-离子和 p-离子系列评分分布表明,ADPr 肽的解离特性在仪器之间和仪器内碰撞能设置之间差异显著,对 ADPr 肽报告和氨基酸定位有影响。因此,通过验证和包含较低置信度的 ADPr 肽谱,我们将可报告的 ADPr 肽数量分别增加了 25%(肝脏)和 17%(脾脏)。这种系统的注释策略将简化使用任何基于 HCD/CID 的方法进行测序的 ADPr 肽的后续报告。