Suppr超能文献

关注语言:生物伦理学中的词源学争论。

Care for Language: Etymology as a Continental Argument in Bioethics.

机构信息

Dean Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Bayle Building, Room J5-65, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):645-654. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10125-z. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

Abstract

Emphasizing the importance of language is a key characteristic of philosophical reflection in general and of bioethics in particular. Rather than trying to eliminate the historicity and ambiguity of language, a continental approach to bioethics will make conscious use of it, for instance by closely studying the history of the key terms we employ in bioethical debates. Continental bioethics entails a focus on the historical vicissitudes of the key signifiers of the bioethical vocabulary, urging us to study the history of terms such as "bioethics," "autonomy," "privacy," and "consensus." Instead of trying to define such terms as clearly and unequivocally as possible, a continental approach rather requires us to take a step backwards, tracing the historical backdrop of the words currently in vogue. By comparing the original meanings of terms with their current meanings, and by considering important moments of transition in their history, obfuscated dimensions of meaning can be retrieved. Thus, notwithstanding a number of methodological challenges involved in etymological exercises, they may foster moral articulacy and enhance our ability to come to terms with moral dilemmas we are facing.

摘要

强调语言的重要性是一般哲学反思特别是生命伦理学的一个关键特征。大陆生命伦理学不是试图消除语言的历史性和模糊性,而是会有意识地利用语言,例如通过仔细研究我们在生命伦理辩论中使用的关键词的历史。大陆生命伦理学关注的是生命伦理词汇的关键能指的历史变迁,促使我们研究诸如“生命伦理学”、“自主性”、“隐私”和“共识”等术语的历史。大陆生命伦理学不是试图尽可能清楚明确地定义这些术语,而是要求我们后退一步,追溯当前流行词汇的历史背景。通过比较术语的原始含义和当前含义,并考虑其历史上的重要过渡时刻,可以找回被混淆的含义维度。因此,尽管词源学研究涉及到一些方法上的挑战,但它们可以促进道德表达能力,并增强我们应对所面临的道德困境的能力。

相似文献

1
Care for Language: Etymology as a Continental Argument in Bioethics.关注语言:生物伦理学中的词源学争论。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):645-654. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10125-z. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
A synthetic approach to bioethical inquiry.一种生物伦理学探究的综合方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21(3):217-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1009966824505.
8
Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference.实验哲学生命伦理学与规范推理。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):91-111. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09546-z. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

2
A Lost Idyll of Connection?失落的连接田园诗?
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):537-540. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10155-7.

本文引用的文献

3
Culture, Truth, and Science After Lacan.拉康之后的文化、真理与科学。
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Dec;12(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9664-2. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
4
Bioethics and literature: an exciting overlap.
J Bioeth Inq. 2014 Jun;11(2):135-6. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9538-z.
5
Duties to kin through a tragi-comic lens.透过悲喜剧视角看对亲属的责任。
J Bioeth Inq. 2014 Jun;11(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9513-8. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
6
Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics.弗里茨·雅尔1927年提出的生物伦理学概念。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2007 Dec;17(4):279-95. doi: 10.1353/ken.2008.0006.
7
The value of autonomy in medical ethics.医学伦理中自主性的价值。
Med Health Care Philos. 2006;9(3):377-88. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-9000-z. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
8
Bioethics and the character of human life.
New Atlantis. 2003 Spring(1):67-78.
9
The history of bioethics: an essay review.生物伦理学的历史:一篇综述文章
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2001 Apr;56(2):168-75. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/56.2.168.
10
The resurgence of nature-speak.自然语言的复兴。
Health Care Anal. 1994 Aug;2(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02251023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验