Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Institute of Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Oct;32(10):1582-1591. doi: 10.1177/0956797621997350. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
Over the past decade, evolutionary psychologists have proposed that many moral stances function to promote self-interests. At the same time, behavioral geneticists have demonstrated that many moral stances have genetic bases. We integrated these perspectives by examining how moral condemnation of recreational drug use relates to sexual strategy (i.e., being more vs. less open to sex outside of a committed relationship) in a sample of Finnish twins and siblings ( = 8,118). Twin modeling suggested that genetic factors accounted for 53%, 46%, and 41% of the variance in drug condemnation, sociosexuality, and sexual-disgust sensitivity, respectively. Further, approximately 75% of the phenotypic covariance between drug condemnation and sexual strategy was accounted for by genes, and there was substantial overlap in the genetic effects underlying both drug condemnation and sexual strategy ( = .41). Results are consistent with the proposal that some moral sentiments are calibrated to promote strategic sexual interests, which arise partially via genetic factors.
在过去的十年中,进化心理学家提出,许多道德立场的作用是促进自身利益。与此同时,行为遗传学家已经证明,许多道德立场都有遗传基础。我们通过在芬兰双胞胎和兄弟姐妹样本中(= 8118 人)检查对娱乐性药物使用的道德谴责与性策略(即更愿意或不愿意在有承诺的关系之外发生性行为)之间的关系,整合了这些观点。双胞胎模型表明,遗传因素分别解释了药物谴责、社交开放性和性厌恶敏感性变异的 53%、46%和 41%。此外,药物谴责和性策略之间的表型协方差约有 75%是由基因决定的,而且药物谴责和性策略的遗传效应有很大的重叠(=0.41)。研究结果与某些道德情感是为了促进策略性的性利益而调整的观点一致,而这些利益部分是通过遗传因素产生的。