Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 22;277(1699):3501-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0608. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Humans, unlike most other species, show intense interest in the activities of conspecifics, even when the activities in question pose no obvious fitness threat or opportunity. Here, we investigate one content domain in which people show substantial interest, the use of drugs for non-medical purposes. Drawing from two subject populations--one undergraduate and one Internet-based--we look at the relationships among (i) abstract political commitments; (ii) attitudes about sexuality; and (iii) views surrounding recreational drugs. Whereas some theories suggest that drug views are best understood as the result of abstract political ideology, we suggest that these views can be better understood in the context of reproductive strategy. We show that, as predicted by a strategic construal, drug attitudes are best predicted by sexual items rather than abstract political commitments and, further, that the relationship between factors such as political ideology and drugs, while positive, are reduced to zero or nearly zero when items assessing sexuality are controlled for. We conclude that considering morality from the standpoint of strategic interests is a potentially useful way to understand why humans care about third party behaviour.
与大多数其他物种不同,人类对同类的活动表现出强烈的兴趣,即使这些活动没有明显的适应威胁或机会。在这里,我们研究了人们表现出浓厚兴趣的一个内容领域,即非医疗目的的药物使用。我们从两个被试群体(一个是本科生群体,一个是基于互联网的群体)中观察了以下因素之间的关系:(i)抽象的政治承诺;(ii)对性的态度;以及(iii)围绕娱乐性药物的观点。尽管有些理论认为,药物观点最好被理解为抽象政治意识形态的结果,但我们认为,这些观点可以在生殖策略的背景下得到更好的理解。我们表明,正如战略解释所预测的那样,药物态度最好由性项目来预测,而不是由抽象的政治承诺来预测,而且,当控制了评估性的项目时,政治意识形态等因素与药物之间的关系虽然是正相关的,但会降低到零或几乎为零。我们的结论是,从战略利益的角度考虑道德是理解为什么人类关心第三方行为的一种潜在有用的方法。