Unit for Social Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Unit for Social Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):e049553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049553.
From a reproductive justice framework, we aimed to investigate how a possible association between hormonal contraceptive (HC) and antidepressants use (as a proxy for depression) is distributed across intersectional strata in the population. We aimed to visualise how intersecting power dynamics may operate in combination with HC use to increase or decrease subsequent use of antidepressants. Our main hypothesis was that the previously observed association between HC and antidepressants use would vary between strata, being more pronounced in more oppressed intersectional contexts. For this purpose, we applied an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy approach.
Observational prospective cohort study using record linkage of national Swedish registers.
The population of Sweden.
All 915 954 women aged 12-30 residing in Sweden 2010, without a recent pregnancy and alive during the individual 1-year follow-up.
Use of any antidepressant, meaning being dispensed at least one antidepressant (ATC: N06A) during follow-up.
Previously mentally healthy HC users had an OR of 1.79 for use of antidepressants compared with non-users, whereas this number was 1.28 for women with previous mental health issues. The highest antidepressant use were uniformly found in strata with previous mental health issues, with highest usage in women aged 24-30 with no immigrant background, low income and HC use (51.4%). The largest difference in antidepressant use between HC users and non-users was found in teenagers, and in adult women of immigrant background with low income. Of the total individual variance in the latent propensity of using antidepressant 9.01% (healthy) and 8.16% (with previous mental health issues) was found at the intersectional stratum level.
Our study suggests teenagers and women with immigrant background and low income could be more sensitive to mood effects of HC, a heterogeneity important to consider moving forward.
从生殖公正的角度出发,我们旨在调查激素避孕药(HC)和抗抑郁药使用(作为抑郁的替代指标)之间的可能关联在人群中的交叉分层中是如何分布的。我们旨在直观地展示交叉权力动态如何与 HC 使用相结合,从而增加或减少随后使用抗抑郁药的情况。我们的主要假设是,HC 与抗抑郁药使用之间先前观察到的关联在分层之间会有所不同,在更受压迫的交叉背景下更为明显。为此,我们应用了个体异质性和判别准确性的交叉多水平分析方法。
利用全国瑞典登记册的记录链接进行的观察性前瞻性队列研究。
瑞典人口。
所有年龄在 12-30 岁之间、2010 年居住在瑞典且无近期妊娠且在个体 1 年随访期间存活的 915954 名女性。
使用任何一种抗抑郁药,即在随访期间至少配给一种抗抑郁药(ATC:N06A)。
与非使用者相比,以前心理健康的 HC 用户使用抗抑郁药的 OR 为 1.79,而以前有心理健康问题的女性这一数字为 1.28。在以前有心理健康问题的人群中,抗抑郁药的使用率普遍较高,在没有移民背景、低收入和 HC 使用的 24-30 岁女性中,使用率最高(51.4%)。在 HC 用户和非使用者之间,抗抑郁药使用差异最大的是青少年,以及移民背景、低收入的成年女性。在潜在抗抑郁药使用的总个体方差中,在交叉分层水平上发现了 9.01%(健康)和 8.16%(以前有心理健康问题)的差异。
我们的研究表明,青少年和移民背景、低收入的女性可能更容易受到 HC 对情绪的影响,这是一个需要考虑的重要异质性。