Appel Helmut, Englich Birte, Burghardt Juliane
Institute of Applied Social Psychology and Decision Making, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Division of Clinical Psychology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:710880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710880. eCollection 2021.
Indecisiveness, the subjective inability to make satisfying decisions, is an individual difference trait that may impede effective actions. Mechanisms underlying indecisiveness are largely unknown. In four studies, we tested the prediction that indicators of evaluation difficulty were associated with indecisiveness in simple evaluations. Across studies, indecisiveness was measured via self-report while evaluation difficulties were derived behaviorally from three indicators: difficulty distinguishing between similar evaluation objects (i.e., standard deviation of evaluation ratings), evaluation duration (reaction times), and implicit evaluations (evaluative priming effect) using familiar everyday objects. Study 1 ( = 151) was based on attractiveness evaluations of portraits. Studies 2a ( = 201) and 2b ( = 211) used chocolate as evaluation objects and manipulated to what extent the evaluations were equivalent to a decision. In Study 3 ( = 80) evaluations were measured implicitly through evaluative priming using food pictures. Contrary to our predictions, indecisiveness showed no reliable association to any indicator of evaluation difficulty, regardless of type of evaluation object, equivalence of evaluation and decision, and whether evaluation difficulty was based on explicit or implicit evaluations. All null findings were supported by Bayes factors. These counterintuitive results are a first step toward investigating evaluation processes as potential mechanisms underlying indecisiveness, showing that for both explicit and implicit measurements, indecisiveness is not characterized by difficulties when evaluating familiar everyday objects.
优柔寡断,即主观上无法做出令人满意的决策,是一种个体差异特质,可能会阻碍有效行动。优柔寡断背后的机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。在四项研究中,我们测试了这样一种预测:评估难度指标与简单评估中的优柔寡断相关。在各项研究中,优柔寡断通过自我报告来衡量,而评估难度则从行为上由三个指标得出:区分相似评估对象的难度(即评估评分的标准差)、评估持续时间(反应时间)以及使用熟悉的日常物品进行的内隐评估(评价性启动效应)。研究1(N = 151)基于对肖像的吸引力评估。研究2a(N = 201)和2b(N = 211)使用巧克力作为评估对象,并操纵评估与决策的等效程度。在研究3(N = 80)中,通过使用食物图片的评价性启动对内隐评估进行测量。与我们的预测相反,无论评估对象的类型、评估与决策的等效性以及评估难度是基于外显评估还是内隐评估,优柔寡断与任何评估难度指标均未显示出可靠的关联。所有零结果均得到贝叶斯因子的支持。这些违反直觉的结果是朝着将评估过程作为优柔寡断潜在机制进行研究迈出的第一步,表明对于外显测量和内隐测量而言,在评估熟悉的日常物品时,优柔寡断的特征并非存在困难。