• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SpAM 的多功能性:多维标度的快速、高效、空间数据收集方法。

The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):256-281. doi: 10.1037/a0028860. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1037/a0028860
PMID:22746700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3465534/
Abstract

Although traditional methods to collect similarity data (for multidimensional scaling [MDS]) are robust, they share a key shortcoming. Specifically, the possible pairwise comparisons in any set of objects grow rapidly as a function of set size. This leads to lengthy experimental protocols, or procedures that involve scaling stimulus subsets. We review existing methods of collecting similarity data, and critically examine the spatial arrangement method (SpAM) proposed by Goldstone (1994a), in which similarity ratings are obtained by presenting many stimuli at once. The participant moves stimuli around the computer screen, placing them at distances from one another that are proportional to subjective similarity. This provides a fast, efficient, and user-friendly method for obtaining MDS spaces. Participants gave similarity ratings to artificially constructed visual stimuli (comprising 2-3 perceptual dimensions) and nonvisual stimuli (animal names) with less-defined underlying dimensions. Ratings were obtained with 4 methods: pairwise comparisons, spatial arrangement, and 2 novel hybrid methods. We compared solutions from alternative methods to the pairwise method, finding that the SpAM produces high-quality MDS solutions. Monte Carlo simulations on degraded data suggest that the method is also robust to reductions in sample sizes and granularity. Moreover, coordinates derived from SpAM solutions accurately predicted discrimination among objects in same-different classification. We address the benefits of using a spatial medium to collect similarity measures.

摘要

虽然传统的相似性数据收集方法(多维标度 [MDS])很稳健,但它们都有一个关键的缺点。具体来说,任何一组对象中的可能成对比较随着集合大小呈指数级增长。这导致了冗长的实验方案或涉及刺激子集缩放的过程。我们回顾了现有的相似性数据收集方法,并批判性地检查了 Goldstone(1994a)提出的空间排列方法(SpAM),其中通过一次呈现许多刺激来获得相似性评分。参与者在计算机屏幕上移动刺激物,将它们彼此之间的距离放置成与主观相似性成比例。这提供了一种快速、高效、用户友好的方法来获得 MDS 空间。参与者对人工构建的视觉刺激物(包含 2-3 个感知维度)和非视觉刺激物(动物名称)进行了相似性评分,这些刺激物的维度定义不太明确。使用 4 种方法获得了评分:成对比较、空间排列和 2 种新颖的混合方法。我们比较了替代方法与成对方法的解决方案,发现 SpAM 产生了高质量的 MDS 解决方案。对退化数据的蒙特卡罗模拟表明,该方法对样本量和粒度的减少也具有稳健性。此外,从 SpAM 解决方案得出的坐标准确预测了相同-不同分类中对象之间的区分。我们探讨了使用空间媒介收集相似性度量的好处。

相似文献

1
The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.SpAM 的多功能性:多维标度的快速、高效、空间数据收集方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):256-281. doi: 10.1037/a0028860. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
SpAM is convenient but also satisfying: Reply to Verheyen et al. (2016).SpAM既方便又令人满意:对Verheyen等人(2016年)的回复。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):383-7. doi: 10.1037/xge0000144.
3
Caveats for the spatial arrangement method: Comment on Hout, Goldinger, and Ferguson (2013).空间排列方法的注意事项:评 Hout、Goldinger 和 Ferguson(2013)。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):376-82. doi: 10.1037/a0039758.
4
The spatial arrangement method of measuring similarity can capture high-dimensional semantic structures.测量相似度的空间排列方法可以捕捉到高维语义结构。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):1906-1928. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01362-y.
5
A Comparison of the Spatial Arrangement Method and the Total-Set Pairwise Rating Method for Obtaining Similarity Data in the Conceptual Domain.一种在概念领域获取相似性数据的空间排列方法和整体集对排序方法的比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):356-384. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1857216. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
MM-MDS: a multidimensional scaling database with similarity ratings for 240 object categories from the Massive Memory picture database.MM-MDS:一个多维缩放数据库,包含来自海量记忆图片数据库中240个对象类别的相似度评级。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112644. eCollection 2014.
7
Multidimensional scaling analyses of two construction-related tasks.
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s002210050678.
8
Individual use of judgmental dimensions and hemispheric specificity.判断维度和半球特异性的个体应用。
Cortex. 1985 Sep;21(3):327-57. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(85)80001-0.
9
Possible role of transient and sustained visual mechanisms in the determination of similarity judgments.瞬态和持续视觉机制在相似性判断确定中的可能作用。
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Dec;47(3 Pt 1):683-98. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.3.683.
10
Visual and semantic similarity norms for a photographic image stimulus set containing recognizable objects, animals and scenes.包含可识别物体、动物和场景的摄影图像刺激集的视觉和语义相似性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2364-2380. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01732-0. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing perceptual judgments in large multimodal models and humans.比较大型多模态模型与人类的感知判断。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 19;57(7):203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02728-w.
2
Breast cancer survivors' perceptual map of breast reconstruction appearance outcomes.乳腺癌幸存者对乳房重建外观效果的感知图。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Sep;12(5):051802. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.5.051802. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
3
A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers.一篇关于从人类观察者收集相似性判断方法的教程综述。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):737-751. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03044-3. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
4
Distractor similarity and category variability effects in search.搜索中的分心物相似性和类别可变性效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2231-2250. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02924-4. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Similarity-based reasoning in conceptual spaces.概念空间中基于相似性的推理。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1234483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1234483. eCollection 2023.
6
Perceived similarity as a window into representations of integrated sentence meaning.感知相似性作为理解整合句子意义的窗口。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2675-2691. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02129-x. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
The structure of prior knowledge enhances memory in experts by reducing interference.先前知识的结构通过减少干扰来增强专家的记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 28;119(26):e2204172119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204172119. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
8
The representation of emotion knowledge across development.情绪知识在发展过程中的表现。
Child Dev. 2022 May;93(3):e237-e250. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13716. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
"I Know What I Like" - Indecisiveness Is Unrelated to Behavioral Indicators of Evaluation Difficulties.《我知道我喜欢什么》——优柔寡断与评估困难的行为指标无关。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:710880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710880. eCollection 2021.
10
Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.重新思考情绪表达:从人类面部动作推断情绪的挑战。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):1-68. doi: 10.1177/1529100619832930.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery of subsampled dimensions and configurations derived from napping data by MFA and MDS.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):1266-78. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0091-0.
2
Learn locally, think globally. Exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning.就地学习,放眼全球。范例变异性支持更高阶的泛化和词汇学习。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1894-902. doi: 10.1177/0956797610389189. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
3
Proximity and precedence in arithmetic.算术中的接近性和优先级。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Oct;63(10):1953-68. doi: 10.1080/17470211003787619. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
4
A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.多维尺度分析自身和跨种族面孔空间。
Cognition. 2010 Aug;116(2):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 23.
5
Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.跨种族面孔学习缺陷:来自眼动和瞳孔测量的见解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1105-22. doi: 10.1037/a0016548.
6
Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?在阿尔茨海默病中,语义相关性的判断是否会受到系统性损害?
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3084-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
7
How to compute reliability estimates and display confidence and tolerance intervals for pattern classifiers using the Bootstrap and 3-way multidimensional scaling (DISTATIS).如何使用自助法和三向多维标度法(DISTATIS)计算模式分类器的可靠性估计值并显示置信区间和容忍区间。
Neuroimage. 2009 Mar 1;45(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.008. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
8
Similarity and proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind?相似性与接近性:空间上的接近何时意味着思维上的接近?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1047-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047.
9
Formal notations are diagrams: evidence from a production task.形式符号即图表:来自一项生产任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2033-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03192935.
10
Multidimensional scaling: a brief overview.多维尺度分析:简要概述。
Nurs Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;57(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280659.88760.7c.