• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全心功能和休克严重程度预测心脏重症监护病房患者的死亡率。

Biventricular Function and Shock Severity Predict Mortality in Cardiac ICU Patients.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Trillium Health Partners, University of Toronto, ON.

Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 2022 Mar;161(3):697-709. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.032
PMID:34610345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventricular function, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD), and biventricular dysfunction (BVD), contribute to shock in cardiac ICU (CICU) patients, but the prognostic usefulness remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do patients with ventricular dysfunction have higher mortality at each Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stage?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified patients in the CICU admitted with available echocardiography data. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, RVSD as moderate or greater systolic dysfunction by semiquantitative measurement, and BVD as the presence of both. Multivariate logistic regression determined the relationship between ventricular dysfunction and adjusted in-hospital mortality as a function of SCAI stage.

RESULTS

The study population included 3,158 patients with a mean ± SD age of 68.2 ± 14.6 years, of which 51.8% had acute coronary syndromes. LVSD was present in 22.3%, RVSD in 11.8%, and BVD in 16.4%. After adjustment for SCAI shock stage, no difference in in-hospital mortality was found between patients with LVSD or RVSD and those without ventricular dysfunction (P > .05), but BVD was associated independently with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.815; 95% CI, 1.237-2.663; P = .0023). The addition of ventricular dysfunction to the SCAI staging criteria increased discrimination for hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.784 vs 0.766; P < .001).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients admitted to the CICU, only BVD was associated independently with higher hospital mortality. The addition of echocardiography assessment to the SCAI shock criteria may facilitate improved clinical risk stratification.

摘要

背景

心室功能,包括左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)、右心室收缩功能障碍(RVSD)和双心室功能障碍(BVD),与心脏重症监护病房(CICU)患者的休克有关,但预后的有用性仍不清楚。

研究问题

在每个心血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)休克阶段,患有心室功能障碍的患者死亡率是否更高?

研究设计和方法

我们在 CICU 中确定了有可用超声心动图数据的患者。LVSD 定义为左心室射血分数<40%,RVSD 定义为通过半定量测量中度或更严重的收缩功能障碍,BVD 定义为两者同时存在。多变量逻辑回归确定了心室功能障碍与 SCAI 阶段调整住院死亡率之间的关系。

结果

研究人群包括 3158 名平均年龄为 68.2±14.6 岁的患者,其中 51.8%患有急性冠状动脉综合征。LVSD 的发生率为 22.3%,RVSD 的发生率为 11.8%,BVD 的发生率为 16.4%。在调整 SCAI 休克阶段后,LVSD 或 RVSD 患者与无心室功能障碍患者的住院死亡率无差异(P>0.05),但 BVD 与较高的住院死亡率独立相关(调整后的危险比为 1.815;95%置信区间,1.237-2.663;P=0.0023)。将心室功能障碍纳入 SCAI 分期标准可提高对医院死亡率的区分度(接受者操作特征曲线下面积,0.784 比 0.766;P<0.001)。

解释

在入住 CICU 的患者中,只有 BVD 与较高的医院死亡率独立相关。将超声心动图评估纳入 SCAI 休克标准可能有助于改善临床风险分层。

相似文献

1
Biventricular Function and Shock Severity Predict Mortality in Cardiac ICU Patients.全心功能和休克严重程度预测心脏重症监护病房患者的死亡率。
Chest. 2022 Mar;161(3):697-709. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
Noninvasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Shock Severity and Mortality Risk Prediction in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.非侵入性血流动力学评估在心脏重症监护病房中的休克严重程度和死亡率风险预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;14(2):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Echocardiographic left ventricular stroke work index: An integrated noninvasive measure of shock severity.超声心动图左心室每搏功指数:一种综合的休克严重程度的无创测量指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0262053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262053. eCollection 2022.
4
Serial Assessment of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.连续评估心脏重症监护病房患者休克严重程度。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e032748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032748. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
Influence of cardiac arrest and SCAI shock stage on cardiac intensive care unit mortality.心搏骤停和 SCAI 休克阶段对心脏重症监护病房死亡率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1350-1359. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28854. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients.收治入院时的休克阶段会使心血管造影及介入治疗学会对心脏重症监护病房患者的出院后死亡率风险进行分层。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jan;219:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Mortality Across the Spectrum of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Patients.全身炎症反应综合征与心脏重症监护患者休克严重程度范围内死亡率增加相关。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec;13(12):e006956. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006956. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
[The Value of Using SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Stages in Predicting Mortality in CICU Patients].[使用SCAI心源性休克分期预测重症监护病房患者死亡率的价值]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 May;52(3):503-509. doi: 10.12182/20210560104.
10
Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock.心脏重症监护病房中患有脓毒症及脓毒性-心源性混合性休克患者的休克严重程度评估
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec 23;6(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.008. eCollection 2022 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
How we use critical care ultrasonography in the management of cardiogenic shock: a strategic game of chess in intensive care.我们如何在心源性休克的管理中使用重症超声检查:重症监护中的一场战略棋局。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08048-z.
2
Biventricular dysfunction predicts mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with cardiogenic shock.双心室功能障碍可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的死亡率。
Egypt Heart J. 2025 Jan 8;77(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00599-8.
3
Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art.
心原性休克的治疗:最新进展。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1814-1829. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07618-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
4
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: Current Studies and Future Directions.急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克中的机械循环支持装置:当前研究与未来方向
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 27;2(2):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100586. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
5
Pulmonary Artery Pressures and Mortality During Venoarterial ECMO: An ELSO Registry Analysis.肺动脉压和静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合期间的死亡率:ELSO 登记分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;17(7):e011123. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011123. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Advances in the Staging and Phenotyping of Cardiogenic Shock: Part 1 of 2.心源性休克分期与表型分析的进展:系列文章第1部分(共2部分)
JACC Adv. 2022 Oct 28;1(4):100120. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100120. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Machine Learning Approaches for Phenotyping in Cardiogenic Shock and Critical Illness: Part 2 of 2.用于心源性休克和危重症表型分析的机器学习方法:第2部分(共2部分)
JACC Adv. 2022 Oct 28;1(4):100126. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100126. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.药物和机械支持对左右心室耦联的影响差异。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024 Oct;17(5):1181-1192. doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review.心源性休克的管理:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y.
10
Dynamic load modulation predicts right heart tolerance of left ventricular cardiovascular assist in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock.动态负荷调节预测左心室心血管辅助对心源性休克猪模型右心的耐受性。
Sci Transl Med. 2024 Feb 14;16(734):eadk4266. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk4266.