Pérez Jolles Mónica, Willging Cathleen E, Stadnick Nicole A, Crable Erika L, Lengnick-Hall Rebecca, Hawkins Jemma, Aarons Gregory A
ACCORDS Dissemination and Implementation Science Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Southwest Center, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Front Health Serv. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.942658. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward.
实施科学(IS)研究领域内越来越多的呼声旨在促进不同且通常被边缘化的利益相关者积极参与,以提高对循证实践(EBPs)的接受度、忠诚度、结果相关性及可持续性。纳入这些声音需要文化谦逊以及在组织、团体和个人之间整合多种观点和价值观。然而,IS领域缺乏针对研究人员构建协作方法以促进共同创造过程(即实现目标的协同方法)的指导。我们认为,改进共同创造的实施合作的操作化对于激发协同作用以及解决利益相关者之间基于权力、特权、知识和资源获取的差异至关重要。如果在研究工作早期不解决这些差异,可能会破坏未来的实施和维持工作。对共同创造的实施合作指导原则的理解不足可能会限制评估过程的科学价值以及研究人员复制结果的能力。我们提出一种以共同创造概念为基础的观点,通过五项原则指导实施合作的构建。我们提供三个基于探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架的案例,以说明这些共同创造原则的应用。最后,我们为推动IS研究中的共同创造提出了建议。