• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者公众参与(PPI)在健康素养研究中的应用:有读写需求的成年人参与共同制定基于医院的健康素养计划。

Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan.

机构信息

Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Community Healthcare West & Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1213-1220. doi: 10.1111/hex.13736. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13736
PMID:36852873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10154788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with literacy needs can experience many challenges in accessing, understanding and using health services and health information. Such challenges can adversely impact patient-provider interactions and ultimately, health outcomes. Healthcare providers need to be aware of health literacy (HL) to address the demands of healthcare systems, improve their interactions with communities and patients and promote patient engagement for improved health outcomes.

METHODS

This paper reports on a process of patient and public involvement (PPI) with participants in an adult literacy programme acting as PPI contributors to identify priority areas for a local hospital HL action plan and to develop a protocol for a PPI process with other groups. A qualitative community-based participatory research study design informed by principles of PPI was undertaken, drawing on the tools of participatory and visual methods, open discussion and workshop format to facilitate a process of co-creation. Three workshops with six PPI contributors took place to identify issues to be included in the hospital action plan. PPI contributors identified issues and grouped these into priority areas using discussion and ranking procedures.

RESULTS

Key areas prioritised for HL action by the PPI contributors were: verbal communication, emphasising the patient's right to understand, and improved understanding of medication use. These were incorporated into the action plan. The workshop format and process were deemed acceptable to the group and input on improvements will be incorporated into further work in this area.

CONCLUSION

PPI acts as a lever in the knowledge translation process. Genuine engagement with service users can meaningfully contribute to relevant and sustainable changes to services as well as foster the empowerment of service users.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Members of the public with literacy needs actively participated in the co-creation of a HL action plan for a local hospital and in the development of a protocol for a patient and public process for HL research.

摘要

背景

有读写需求的人在获取、理解和使用医疗服务和健康信息方面可能会遇到许多挑战。这些挑战可能会对医患互动产生不利影响,并最终影响健康结果。医疗保健提供者需要了解健康素养(HL),以满足医疗保健系统的需求,改善他们与社区和患者的互动,并促进患者参与以改善健康结果。

方法

本文报告了一个患者和公众参与(PPI)的过程,参与成人扫盲计划的参与者作为 PPI 贡献者,确定当地医院 HL 行动计划的优先领域,并为其他群体制定 PPI 流程的协议。采用基于 PPI 的原则的定性社区参与式研究设计,借鉴参与式和可视化方法、公开讨论和研讨会格式的工具,促进共同创造的过程。与六名 PPI 贡献者举行了三次研讨会,以确定应包含在医院行动计划中的问题。PPI 贡献者通过讨论和排名程序确定问题并将其分组为优先领域。

结果

PPI 贡献者优先考虑 HL 行动的关键领域是:口头沟通、强调患者的知情权以及提高对药物使用的理解。这些都被纳入行动计划。小组认为研讨会的形式和流程是可以接受的,并将在该领域的进一步工作中纳入对改进的意见。

结论

PPI 是知识转化过程中的一个杠杆。与服务使用者的真正参与可以为服务的相关和可持续变革做出有意义的贡献,并促进服务使用者的赋权。

患者或公众的贡献

有读写需求的公众积极参与了当地医院 HL 行动计划的共同制定,并参与了 HL 研究的患者和公众参与流程的协议制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f4/10154788/1258a3ade1c6/HEX-26-1213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f4/10154788/1258a3ade1c6/HEX-26-1213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f4/10154788/1258a3ade1c6/HEX-26-1213-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan.患者公众参与(PPI)在健康素养研究中的应用:有读写需求的成年人参与共同制定基于医院的健康素养计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1213-1220. doi: 10.1111/hex.13736. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Health literacy - engaging the community in the co-creation of meaningful health navigation services: a study protocol.健康素养——让社区参与有意义的健康导航服务的共同创建:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3315-3.
6
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
7
How to co-design a health literacy-informed intervention based on a needs assessment study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.如何基于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的需求评估研究共同设计一项以健康素养为导向的干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e063022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063022.
8
Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Interest in public involvement, engagement and participation in research among patients with asthma: A secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA study.哮喘患者对公众参与、介入和参与研究的兴趣:EPI - 哮喘研究的二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 12;20(9):e0332220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332220. eCollection 2025.
2
Health literacy research on the island of Ireland: a systematic review.爱尔兰岛的健康素养研究:一项系统综述。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf138.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.绘制患者和公众参与医疗创新不同阶段的作用图谱:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):840-855. doi: 10.1111/hex.13437. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
Implementation of an Ask Me 3 ® education video to improve outcomes in post-myocardial infarction patients.实施“问我三件事”®教育视频以改善心肌梗死后患者的预后。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Sep 4;8:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100253. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.
患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Health Promotion Glossary 2021.《2021年健康促进术语汇编》
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1578-1598. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa157.
5
Increasing Health Literacy May Reduce Health Inequalities: Evidence from a National Population Survey in Ireland.提高健康素养可能会减少健康不平等:来自爱尔兰全国人口调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165891.
6
Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.参与公平:社区参与式研究和社区参与式研究实践与成果的长期研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):380-390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075.
7
Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.患者和公众参与中低收入国家的卫生研究:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026514.
8
Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review.健康素养是否介导了社会经济地位与健康差距之间的关系?综合综述。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):e1-e17. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day062.
9
Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.患者和公众参与(PPI)在定性心理健康研究协作数据分析中的最佳实践框架:方法学的发展和完善。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1794-8.
10
How can communities and organisations improve their health literacy?社区和组织如何提高其健康素养?
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Jun 14;28(2):2821809. doi: 10.17061/phrp2821809.