Buchanan Jennie A, Moreira Maria, Taira Taku, Byyny Richard, Jarou Zachary, Taylor Todd Andrew, Sungar W Gannon, Angerhofer Christy, Dyer Sean, White Melissa, Amin Dhara, D Lall Michelle, Caro David, E Parsons Melissa, Smith Teresa Y
Denver Health & Hospital Authority Department of Emergency Medicine & University of Colorado Department of Emergency Medicine Denver Colorado USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine LAC+USC Medical Center Los Angeles California USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S87-S97. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10664. eCollection 2021 Sep.
There is no clear unified definition of "county programs" in emergency medicine (EM). Key residency directories are varied in designation, despite it being one of the most important match factors for applicants. The Council of Residency Directors EM County Program Community of Practice consists of residency program leadership from a unified collective of programs that identify as "county." This paper's framework was spurred from numerous group discussions to better understand unifying themes that define county programs.
This institutional review board-exempt work provides qualitative descriptive results via a mixed-methods inquiry utilizing survey data and quantitative data from programs that self-designate as county.
Most respondents work, identify, and trained at a county program. The majority defined county programs by commitment to care for the underserved, funding from the city or state, low-resourced, and urban setting. Major qualitative themes included mission, clinical environment, research, training, and applicant recommendations. Comparing the attributes of programs by self-described type of training environment, county programs are typically larger, older, in central metro areas, and more likely to be 4 years in duration and have higher patient volumes when compared to community or university programs. When comparing hospital-level attributes of primary training sites county programs are more likely to be owned and operated by local governments or governmental hospital districts and authorities and see more disproportionate-share hospital patients.
To be considered a county program we recommend some or most of the following attributes be present: a shared mission to medically underserved and vulnerable patients, an urban location with city or county funding, an ED with high patient volumes, supportive of resident autonomy, and research expertise focusing on underserved populations.
急诊医学(EM)中“县级项目”没有明确统一的定义。尽管它是申请人最重要的匹配因素之一,但关键住院医师培训名录中的指定各不相同。住院医师培训主任委员会急诊医学县级项目实践社区由来自统一的、自称为“县级”的项目集体中的住院医师培训项目领导组成。本文的框架源于多次小组讨论,以更好地理解定义县级项目的统一主题。
这项免于机构审查委员会审查的工作通过混合方法探究,利用自我指定为县级项目的调查数据和定量数据,提供定性描述性结果。
大多数受访者在县级项目工作、任职并接受培训。大多数人将县级项目定义为致力于为服务不足人群提供护理、由市或州提供资金、资源匮乏且位于城市地区。主要的定性主题包括使命、临床环境、研究、培训和申请人建议。按自我描述的培训环境类型比较项目属性时,与社区或大学项目相比,县级项目通常规模更大、历史更久、位于中心都市地区,更有可能为期4年且患者量更多。比较主要培训地点的医院层面属性时,县级项目更有可能由地方政府或政府医院区及当局拥有和运营,且接收更多不成比例份额医院的患者。
要被视为县级项目,我们建议具备以下部分或大部分属性:对医疗服务不足和弱势患者的共同使命、有市或县资金支持的城市地点、患者量高的急诊科、支持住院医师自主权以及专注于服务不足人群的研究专业知识。