Jena University Hospital, Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics, Campus Eisenberg, University of Jena, Eisenberg, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3757-3764. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01805-x. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
Various plate shapes and implant configurations are used for stabilization of acetabulum fractures via anterior approaches. Little is known about the biomechanical stability of a two-dimensionally shaped "conventional" plate ("J-Plate"-JP) in comparison to three-dimensionally shaped plate configurations (3DP). In addition, the augmentary effect of an infra-acetabular lag-screw (IACS) fixation for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabulum fractures has not been clarified in comparison of JP and 3DP constructs. This study analyzed the difference between the biomechanical stability of JP compared to 3DP and the role of an IACS in a standardized acetabular fracture model in a single-leg stance loading configuration.
In an artificial bone substitute pelvis model (Synbone Malans, Switzerland), a typical and standardized fracture pattern (anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse) was created with osteotomy jigs. After anatomic reduction the stabilization was performed using JP or 3DP. Eight pelvises per group were axially loaded in a single-leg stance model up to 400 N. After the load cycle, an additional infra-acetabular screw was placed and the measurement repeated. Fragment displacement was recorded by an optical tracking system (Optitrack Prime 13®, Corvallis, USA).
In the pure placement, 3DP provided significantly superior stability when compared to JP. Augmentation of JP by IACS increased the stability significantly, up to the level of 3DP alone, whereas augmentation of the 3DP did not result in further increase of overall stability.
The anatomically shaped plate alone provides a superior biomechanical stability in fixation of an anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse fracture model. In a JP fixation the augmentation by IACS provides similar strength as the anatomically shaped 3DP. By use of the anatomically shaped 3DP the need of a clinically risky application of IACS might be avoidable.
IV, Experimental study.
通过前入路稳定髋臼骨折时,使用各种形状的钢板和植入物配置。与三维成形的钢板配置(3DP)相比,对于二维成形的“常规”钢板(“J 板”-JP)的生物力学稳定性知之甚少。此外,在 JP 和 3DP 结构中,对于前柱和后半横形髋臼骨折,附加的髋臼下拉力螺钉(IACS)固定的增强效果尚未阐明。本研究分析了 JP 与 3DP 的生物力学稳定性之间的差异,以及在单腿站立负荷配置的标准化髋臼骨折模型中 IACS 的作用。
在人工骨替代骨盆模型(Synbone Malans,瑞士)中,使用截骨夹具创建典型且标准化的骨折模式(前柱和后半横形)。解剖复位后,使用 JP 或 3DP 进行稳定。每组 8 个骨盆在单腿站立模型中进行轴向加载,直至达到 400 N。在负载循环后,放置附加的髋臼下螺钉并重复测量。通过光学跟踪系统(Optitrack Prime 13®,Corvallis,USA)记录碎片位移。
在纯放置中,3DP 提供的稳定性明显优于 JP。通过 IACS 增强 JP 可显著提高稳定性,直至达到单独使用 3DP 的水平,而增强 3DP 不会导致整体稳定性进一步提高。
在固定前柱和后半横形骨折模型时,解剖成形的钢板单独提供了更好的生物力学稳定性。在 JP 固定中,IACS 的增强提供了与解剖成形的 3DP 相似的强度。通过使用解剖成形的 3DP,可能可以避免临床风险较大的 IACS 的应用。
IV,实验研究。