• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种人工智能解决方案在非对比 CT 头部扫描的急性分诊和排除正常中的应用。

Validation of an artificial intelligence solution for acute triage and rule-out normal of non-contrast CT head scans.

机构信息

Behold.ai, 180 Borough high St, London, SE1 1LB, UK.

Department of Radiology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, RM7 0AG, UK.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2022 Apr;64(4):735-743. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02826-4. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-021-02826-4
PMID:34623478
Abstract

PURPOSE

Non-contrast CT head scans provide rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute head injury; however, increased utilisation of CT head scans makes it difficult to prioritise acutely unwell patients and places pressure on busy emergency departments (EDs). This study validates an AI algorithm to triage patients presenting with Intracranial Haemorrhage (ICH) or Acute Infarct whilst also identifying a subset of patients as Normal, with the potential to function as a rule-out test.

METHODS

In total, 390 CT head scans were collected from 3 institutions in the UK, US and India. Ground-truth labels were assigned by 3 FRCR consultant radiologists. AI performance, as well as the performance of 3 independent radiologists, was measured against ground-truth labels.

RESULTS

The algorithm showed AUC values of 0.988 (0.978-0.994), 0.933 (0.901-0.961) and 0.939 (0.919-0.958) for ICH, Acute Infarct and Normal, respectively. Sensitivity/specificity for ICH and Acute Infarct were 0.988/0.925 and 0.833/0.927, respectively, compared to 0.907/0.991 and 0.618/0.977 for radiologists. AI rule-out of Normal scans achieved 0.93% negative predictive value (NPV) for the removal of 54.3% of Normal cases, compared to 86.8% NPV for radiologists.

CONCLUSION

We show our algorithm can provide effective triage of ICH and Acute Infarct to prioritise acutely unwell patients. AI can also benefit clinical accuracy, with the algorithm identifying 91.3% of radiologist false negatives for ICH and 69.1% for Acute Infarct. Rule-out of Normal scans has huge potential for workload management in busy EDs, in this case removing 27.4% of all scans with no acute findings missed.

摘要

目的

非对比 CT 头部扫描可快速准确诊断急性头部损伤;然而,由于头部 CT 扫描的使用增加,使得对病情严重的患者进行优先排序变得困难,并给繁忙的急诊科(ED)带来压力。本研究验证了一种人工智能算法,用于对颅内出血(ICH)或急性梗塞患者进行分诊,同时也确定了一部分患者为正常,有可能作为排除测试。

方法

共从英国、美国和印度的 3 家机构收集了 390 例头部 CT 扫描。由 3 位 FRCR 顾问放射科医生对地面真实标签进行分配。根据地面真实标签测量 AI 性能以及 3 位独立放射科医生的性能。

结果

该算法对 ICH、急性梗塞和正常的 AUC 值分别为 0.988(0.978-0.994)、0.933(0.901-0.961)和 0.939(0.919-0.958)。ICH 和急性梗塞的敏感性/特异性分别为 0.988/0.925 和 0.833/0.927,而放射科医生的敏感性/特异性分别为 0.907/0.991 和 0.618/0.977。AI 对正常扫描的排除可实现 0.93%的阴性预测值(NPV),可排除 54.3%的正常病例,而放射科医生的 NPV 为 86.8%。

结论

我们表明,我们的算法可以有效地对 ICH 和急性梗塞进行分诊,以优先处理病情严重的患者。人工智能还可以提高临床准确性,该算法识别出 ICH 放射科医生 91.3%的假阴性和急性梗塞 69.1%的假阴性。正常扫描的排除对繁忙急诊科的工作量管理具有巨大潜力,在这种情况下,可排除 27.4%的所有无急性发现的扫描。

相似文献

1
Validation of an artificial intelligence solution for acute triage and rule-out normal of non-contrast CT head scans.验证一种人工智能解决方案在非对比 CT 头部扫描的急性分诊和排除正常中的应用。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Apr;64(4):735-743. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02826-4. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Artificial intelligence for detection of intracranial haemorrhage on head computed tomography scans: diagnostic accuracy in Hong Kong.人工智能检测头 CT 扫描颅内出血:香港的诊断准确性。
Hong Kong Med J. 2023 Apr;29(2):112-120. doi: 10.12809/hkmj209053.
3
Commercially-available AI algorithm improves radiologists' sensitivity for wrist and hand fracture detection on X-ray, compared to a CT-based ground truth.商业可用的人工智能算法提高了放射科医生在 X 光片上对手腕和手部骨折检测的敏感性,与基于 CT 的金标准相比。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2885-2894. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10380-1. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Utility of Artificial Intelligence Tool as a Prospective Radiology Peer Reviewer - Detection of Unreported Intracranial Hemorrhage.人工智能工具作为潜在放射学同行评审者的效用——检测未报告的颅内出血。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.035. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
A deep learning algorithm for automatic detection and classification of acute intracranial hemorrhages in head CT scans.一种用于头部 CT 扫描中急性颅内出血自动检测和分类的深度学习算法。
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;32:102785. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102785. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm versus radiologists for fracture detection on cervical spine CT.人工智能算法与放射科医生在颈椎 CT 骨折检测中的诊断准确性比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5041-5048. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10559-6. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Prospective Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Triage of Intracranial Hemorrhage on Noncontrast Head CT Examinations.非增强头部CT检查中人工智能对颅内出血进行分诊的前瞻性评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Nov;223(5):e2431639. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31639. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
8
Added value of an artificial intelligence algorithm in reducing the number of missed incidental acute pulmonary embolism in routine portal venous phase chest CT.人工智能算法在减少常规门静脉期胸部 CT 中遗漏偶发性急性肺栓塞数量方面的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):367-373. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10029-z. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
9
Accuracy and time efficiency of a novel deep learning algorithm for Intracranial Hemorrhage detection in CT Scans.一种新型深度学习算法在 CT 扫描中检测颅内出血的准确性和时间效率。
Radiol Med. 2024 Oct;129(10):1499-1506. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01867-y. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
10
Comparison of Chest Radiograph Interpretations by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm vs Radiology Residents.人工智能算法与放射科住院医师对胸部 X 线片解读的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22779.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in Non-Contrast Brain CT Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.深度学习在非增强脑部CT扫描中检测颅内出血的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 30;14(7):2377. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072377.
2
Artificial Intelligence for Neuroimaging in Pediatric Cancer.用于儿科癌症神经成像的人工智能
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;17(4):622. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040622.
3
Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Erratum: Construction of a Machine Learning Dataset through Collaboration: The RSNA 2019 Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge.勘误:通过合作构建机器学习数据集:2019年RSNA脑CT出血挑战赛。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 29;2(4):e209002. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020209002. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Expert-level detection of acute intracranial hemorrhage on head computed tomography using deep learning.使用深度学习技术对头 CT 进行急性颅内出血的专家级检测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22737-22745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908021116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
An explainable deep-learning algorithm for the detection of acute intracranial haemorrhage from small datasets.
绘制并总结用于自动采集病史和分诊的人工智能系统的研究:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 6;27:e53741. doi: 10.2196/53741.
4
AI assisted reader evaluation in acute CT head interpretation (AI-REACT): protocol for a multireader multicase study.人工智能辅助急性 CT 头部解读中读者评估(AI-REACT):一项多读者多病例研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 12;14(2):e079824. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079824.
5
Tackling prediction uncertainty in machine learning for healthcare.解决医疗保健机器学习中的预测不确定性。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2023 Jun;7(6):711-718. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00988-x. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Competition (TEKNOFEST-2021): Stroke Data Set.医疗保健领域的人工智能竞赛(TEKNOFEST - 2021):中风数据集
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Oct;54(3):248-258. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22096.
一种基于可解释深度学习算法的小型数据集急性颅内出血检测方法。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;3(3):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0324-9. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.深度学习算法在头部 CT 扫描中关键发现检测的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Overuse of Head CT Examinations for the Investigation of Minor Head Trauma: Analysis of Contributing Factors.头部CT检查在轻微头部创伤检查中的过度使用:影响因素分析。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Feb;14(2):171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke.发病 8 小时内进行缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Hospital variation in thrombolysis times among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the contributions of door-to-imaging time and imaging-to-needle time.患者急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间的医院差异:从门到影像时间和影像到针时间的作用。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Sep;71(9):1155-61. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1528.
8
Imaging after brain injury.脑损伤后的影像学检查。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):49-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem141.
9
Time is brain--quantified.时间就是大脑——量化了的。
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):263-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab. Epub 2005 Dec 8.