Prasad Minakshi, Kumar Rajesh, Buragohain Lukumoni, Kumari Ankur, Ghosh Mayukh
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Sep 23;9:696668. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.696668. eCollection 2021.
Engineered nanomaterials are bestowed with certain inherent physicochemical properties unlike their parent materials, rendering them suitable for the multifaceted needs of state-of-the-art biomedical, and pharmaceutical applications. The log-phase development of nano-science along with improved "bench to beside" conversion carries an enhanced probability of human exposure with numerous nanoparticles. Thus, toxicity assessment of these novel nanoscale materials holds a key to ensuring the safety aspects or else the global biome will certainly face a debacle. The toxicity may span from health hazards due to direct exposure to indirect means through food chain contamination or environmental pollution, even causing genotoxicity. Multiple ways of nanotoxicity evaluation include several and methods, with methods occupying the bulk of the "experimental space." The underlying reason may be multiple, but ethical constraints in animal experiments are a significant one. Two-dimensional (2D) monoculture is undoubtedly the most exploited method providing advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness, high throughput, and reproducibility. However, it often fails to mimic a tissue or organ which possesses a defined three-dimensional structure (3D) along with intercellular communication machinery. Instead, microtissues such as spheroids or organoids having a precise 3D architecture and proximate tissue-like behavior can provide a more realistic evaluation than 2D monocultures. Recent developments in microfluidics and bioreactor-based organoid synthesis have eased the difficulties to prosper nano-toxicological analysis in organoid models surpassing the obstacle of ethical issues. The present review will enlighten applications of organoids in nanotoxicological evaluation, their advantages, and prospects toward securing commonplace nano-interventions.
与母体材料不同,工程纳米材料具有某些固有的物理化学性质,使其适用于先进生物医学和制药应用的多方面需求。纳米科学的对数期发展以及改进的“从实验室到床边”转化增加了人类接触大量纳米颗粒的可能性。因此,对这些新型纳米材料进行毒性评估是确保安全的关键,否则全球生物群落肯定会面临崩溃。毒性可能包括直接接触造成的健康危害,以及通过食物链污染或环境污染的间接途径,甚至会导致基因毒性。纳米毒性评估的多种方法包括多种……方法,其中……方法占据了大部分“实验空间”。其潜在原因可能有多个,但动物实验中的伦理限制是一个重要原因。二维(2D)单培养无疑是应用最广泛的……方法,在成本效益、高通量和可重复性方面具有优势。然而,它往往无法模拟具有明确三维结构(3D)以及细胞间通讯机制的组织或器官。相反,具有精确3D结构和近似组织样行为的微组织,如球体或类器官,比2D单培养能提供更真实的评估。微流控和基于生物反应器的类器官合成的最新进展减轻了在类器官模型中进行纳米毒理学分析的困难,克服了伦理问题的障碍。本综述将阐述类器官在纳米毒理学评估中的应用、它们的优势以及确保常见纳米干预措施安全的前景。