• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于与《仙台减少灾害风险框架》相一致的国家灾害风险减少政策的研究:确定孟加拉国的改进范围。

A study on national DRR policy in alignment with the SFDRR: Identifying the scopes of improvement for Bangladesh.

作者信息

Mannan Sushmita, Haque Dewan Mohammad Enamul, Sarker Netai Chandra Dey

机构信息

Bangladesh Urban Resilience Project, DDM Part, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Disaster Science and Management, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Prog Disaster Sci. 2021 Dec;12:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100206. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100206
PMID:34632365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8492017/
Abstract

Sendai Framework sets four priority areas and 7 targets to meet in between 2015 and 2030 timeline. Of the seven Sendai Framework global targets, international attention has increasingly concentrated on the one with the most urgent deadline, target E. The target E stands for "substantially increase the number of countries with national and local disaster risk reduction strategies by 2020 The reported status of the member states is not that satisfactory in the context of meeting the deadline. Moreover, the worldwide COVID-19 outbreak has slowed the progress of updating national DRR policy documents. This study has investigated the existing shortfalls in the foundational DRR policy instruments of Bangladesh and contributes in developing a framework of National DRR Strategy in line with the SFDRR guideline in order to meet the target E. In doing so, this study has critically reviewed the national DRR policies to find out the gaps in line with SFDRR considering the country context and also compared different aspects of national DRR strategy with a few developed and developing countries. In addition, the policy initiatives of Bangladesh Government tackling COVID-19 outbreak have been evaluated. This research is anchored with qualitative research focus. The method of the study is carried out by an extensive literature review and key informants' interview to get the perspective of relevant stakeholders.

摘要

《仙台框架》设定了四个优先领域和七个目标,要在2015年至2030年期间实现。在《仙台框架》的七个全球目标中,国际社会的关注日益集中在期限最紧迫的目标E上。目标E代表“到2020年大幅增加拥有国家和地方灾害风险减少战略的国家数量”。在截止日期方面,成员国的报告情况并不理想。此外,全球范围内的新冠疫情减缓了更新国家灾害风险减少政策文件的进程。本研究调查了孟加拉国灾害风险减少基础政策工具中存在的不足,并为制定符合《仙台减少灾害风险框架》指南的国家灾害风险减少战略框架做出贡献,以实现目标E。在此过程中,本研究严格审查了国家灾害风险减少政策,以根据《仙台减少灾害风险框架》找出符合该国国情的差距,并将国家灾害风险减少战略的不同方面与一些发达国家和发展中国家进行了比较。此外,还评估了孟加拉国政府应对新冠疫情的政策举措。本研究以定性研究为重点。该研究方法通过广泛的文献综述和关键信息提供者访谈来获取相关利益攸关方的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/8395b50708e6/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/7247e6e61b28/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/ba80395a8f12/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/7032107afcb8/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/87f2c31ec655/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/8395b50708e6/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/7247e6e61b28/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/ba80395a8f12/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/7032107afcb8/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/87f2c31ec655/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e00e/8492017/8395b50708e6/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A study on national DRR policy in alignment with the SFDRR: Identifying the scopes of improvement for Bangladesh.一项关于与《仙台减少灾害风险框架》相一致的国家灾害风险减少政策的研究:确定孟加拉国的改进范围。
Prog Disaster Sci. 2021 Dec;12:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100206. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Moving Forward after Sendai: How Countries Want to Use Science, Evidence and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction.《仙台会议之后的前行之路:各国如何利用科学、证据和技术进行灾害风险 reduction》(注:这里“reduction”常见释义为“减少”,结合语境可能是“灾害风险降低”之类更准确表述,因原英文表述有缺失信息)
PLoS Curr. 2015 May 14;7:ecurrents.dis.22247d6293d4109d09794890bcda1878. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.22247d6293d4109d09794890bcda1878.
3
The role of public participation in disaster risk reduction initiatives: The case of Katlehong township.公众参与在减灾倡议中的作用:以卡特洪镇为例。
Jamba. 2022 Feb 28;14(1):1203. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1203. eCollection 2022.
4
Regional Policy for Disaster Risk Management in Developing Countries Within the Sendai Framework: A Systematic Review.《仙台框架下发展中国家灾害风险管理的区域政策:系统综述》
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 13;7(13):2213-2219. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.614. eCollection 2019 Jul 15.
5
Contribution of the International Consortium on Landslides to the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: engraining to the Science and Technology Roadmap.国际滑坡协会对《仙台减少灾害风险框架》实施工作的贡献:融入科学技术路线图
Landslides. 2021;18(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s10346-020-01539-8. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Revitalising Evidence-based Policy for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030: Lessons from Existing International Science Partnerships.为《2015-2030年仙台减少灾害风险框架》重振循证政策:现有国际科学伙伴关系的经验教训
PLoS Curr. 2015 Apr 23;7:ecurrents.dis.aaab45b2b4106307ae2168a485e03b8a. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.aaab45b2b4106307ae2168a485e03b8a.
7
Delivering the Promise of Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Contexts (FCAC): A Case Study of the NGO GOAL's Response to the Syria Conflict.在脆弱和受冲突影响地区(FCAC)实现《仙台减少灾害风险框架》的承诺:非政府组织“目标”应对叙利亚冲突的案例研究
Prog Disaster Sci. 2021 Apr;10. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100172. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Building resilience against biological hazards and pandemics: COVID-19 and its implications for the Sendai Framework.增强抵御生物危害和大流行病的能力:新冠疫情及其对《仙台框架》的影响
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Apr;6:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100080. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Developing the Philippines as a Global Hub for Disaster Risk Reduction - A Health Research Initiative as Presented at the 10th Philippine National Health Research System Week Celebration.将菲律宾发展成为全球减少灾害风险中心——在第十届菲律宾国家卫生研究系统周庆祝活动上提出的一项卫生研究倡议。
PLoS Curr. 2016 Oct 25;8:ecurrents.dis.5cf90566bb7791456dcf6b9baf6d4873. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.5cf90566bb7791456dcf6b9baf6d4873.
10
Report of Alliance of International Science Organizations on Disaster Risk Reduction (ANSO-DRR) Conference 2020.2020 年国际科学组织联盟减灾会议报告。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;17(23):8772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238772.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Vietnam government's experience and preliminary success.应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应:越南政府的经验与初步成功。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020502.
2
COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey.新冠疫情防控:土耳其卫生部的范例。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 21;50(SI-1):489-494. doi: 10.3906/sag-2004-187.