• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Within-person patterns of psychobiological stress response correspondence: links to preadolescent internalizing problems and coping behaviors.个体内心理生物应激反应对应模式:与青春期前内化问题和应对行为的关联。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Sep;35(5):592-608. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1982912. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
2
Person-centered examination of salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to psychosocial stress: Links to preadolescent behavioral functioning and coping.以个体为中心对唾液皮质醇和α-淀粉酶对应激心理社会压力的反应进行的研究:与青春期前行为功能和应对方式的关联。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Feb;132:143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Adolescent stress experience-expression-physiology correspondence: Links to depression, self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, and frontolimbic neural circuity.青少年压力体验-表达-生理对应关系:与抑郁、自伤思想和行为以及额眶皮质神经回路的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.098. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Adolescent girls' stress responses as prospective predictors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A person-centered, multilevel study.青少年女性的应激反应对自伤意念和行为的前瞻性预测:一项基于个体的多层次研究。
Dev Psychopathol. 2022 Oct;34(4):1447-1467. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420002229. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Adolescent cortisol and DHEA responses to stress as prospective predictors of emotional and behavioral difficulties: A person-centered approach.青少年皮质醇和 DHEA 对压力的反应作为情绪和行为困难的前瞻性预测指标:一种以个体为中心的方法。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021 Oct;132:105365. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105365. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
If the coping fits, use it: Preadolescent recent stress exposure differentially predicts post-TSST salivary cortisol recovery.若应对方式合适,就加以运用:青春期前近期的压力暴露对TSST后唾液皮质醇恢复情况有不同的预测作用。
Dev Psychobiol. 2017 Nov;59(7):848-862. doi: 10.1002/dev.21542. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Individual Differences in Adolescent Coping: Comparing a Community Sample and a Low-SES Sample to Understand Coping in Context.青少年应对方式的个体差异:通过比较社区样本和低社会经济地位样本来理解背景下的应对方式。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Apr;50(4):693-710. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01398-z. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
Self- or parent report of (co-occurring) internalizing and externalizing problems, and basal or reactivity measures of HPA-axis functioning: a systematic evaluation of the internalizing-hyperresponsivity versus externalizing-hyporesponsivity HPA-axis hypothesis.自身或家长报告的(共病)内化和外化问题,以及 HPA 轴功能的基础或反应性测量:对内化过度反应与外化低反应性 HPA 轴假说的系统评估。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Sep;94(1):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
9
Executive Function and Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescents and Young Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: The Role of Coping.先天性心脏病青少年和年轻成人的执行功能与内化症状:应对方式的作用。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Sep 1;43(8):906-915. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx154.
10
Moderating Effects of Coping on Associations between Autonomic Arousal and Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Problems.应对方式对自主唤醒与青少年内外向问题关系的调节作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(5):846-58. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.891224. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent stress experience-expression-physiology correspondence: Links to depression, self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, and frontolimbic neural circuity.青少年压力体验-表达-生理对应关系:与抑郁、自伤思想和行为以及额眶皮质神经回路的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.098. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the Trier Social Stress Test in eliciting physiological stress responses in children and adolescents.元分析:特里斯社会应激测试在诱发儿童和青少年生理应激反应中的有效性。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 Jun;116:104582. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104582. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
2
Emotion regulation and cortisol reactivity during a social evaluative stressor: A study of post-institutionalized youth.情绪调节与社会评价性应激下皮质醇反应:被机构化青年的研究。
Dev Psychobiol. 2019 May;61(4):557-572. doi: 10.1002/dev.21828. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Group-based multi-trajectory modeling.基于群组的多轨迹建模。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):2015-2023. doi: 10.1177/0962280216673085. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
A Prospective Examination of Emotional Clarity, Stress Responses, and Depressive Symptoms During Early Adolescence.青春期早期情绪清晰度、应激反应和抑郁症状的前瞻性研究。
J Early Adolesc. 2014;34(7):923-939. doi: 10.1177/0272431613513959. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
5
Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review.应对方式、情绪调节与儿童及青少年时期的精神病理学:一项元分析和叙述性综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991. doi: 10.1037/bul0000110. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Patterns of Adolescent Regulatory Responses During Family Conflict and Mental Health Trajectories.青少年在家庭冲突期间的调节反应模式与心理健康轨迹。
J Res Adolesc. 2017 Mar;27(1):229-245. doi: 10.1111/jora.12269. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
7
All anxiety is not created equal: Correlates of parent/youth agreement vary across subtypes of anxiety.并非所有焦虑都是一样的:父母/青少年一致性的相关因素因焦虑亚型而异。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 Dec;38(4):528-537. doi: 10.1007/s10862-016-9544-z. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Perceptual asymmetry and youths' responses to stress: Understanding vulnerability to depression.知觉不对称与青少年对压力的反应:理解抑郁症易感性
Cogn Emot. 2007;21(4):773-788. doi: 10.1080/02699930600824635.
9
Individual Differences in the Psychobiological Response to Psychosocial Stress (Trier Social Stress Test): The Relevance of Trait Anxiety and Coping Styles.心理社会应激(特里尔社会应激测试)的心理生物学反应中的个体差异:特质焦虑和应对方式的相关性。
Stress Health. 2016 Apr;32(2):90-9. doi: 10.1002/smi.2582. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
10
Hormones: commentary. Riding the physiological roller coaster: adaptive significance of cortisol stress reactivity to social contexts.激素:评论。驾驭生理过山车:皮质醇应激反应对社会环境的适应意义。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Feb;28(1):40-51. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2014.28.1.40.

个体内心理生物应激反应对应模式:与青春期前内化问题和应对行为的关联。

Within-person patterns of psychobiological stress response correspondence: links to preadolescent internalizing problems and coping behaviors.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Sep;35(5):592-608. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1982912. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1080/10615806.2021.1982912
PMID:34632877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8994789/
Abstract

Though correspondence across the affective experience and physiologic arousal levels of the stress response is thought to support efficacious coping and buffer against internalizing problems, little evidence has demonstrated such correspondence. Using a community sample of preadolescents (N=151, Mage=10.33 years, Minage=8.92, Maxage=12.00, 51.7% male), this person-centered study examined internalizing problem and coping-linked variability in psychobiological stress response correspondence. Preadolescents were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test and self-reported negative affect (NA) and salivary cortisol (SC) levels were assessed. Multitrajectory modeling revealed four subgroups. Relative to In-Touch (i.e., Moderate NA-Moderate SC; n=65), Unmindful (i.e., Moderate NA-Low SC; n=49) were more likely to present with parent-reported but not self-reported internalizing problems; Vigilant (i.e., High NA-Low SC; n=13) were more likely to present with self- and parent-reported internalizing problems, less likely to use engagement coping, and more likely to use wishful thinking (e.g., "I wish problems would just go away."); Denial (i.e., Low NA-High SC; n=24) self-reported similarly low internalizing problems, but were also more likely to report reliance on denial (e.g., "I pretend problems don't exist."). Findings illustrate meaningful heterogeneity in preadolescent psychobiological correspondence with implications for multimodal assessment and outcome monitoring in coping-based preventative interventions.

摘要

虽然人们认为情感体验和应激反应的生理唤醒水平之间的对应关系可以支持有效的应对方式,并缓冲内化问题,但很少有证据表明存在这种对应关系。本项以社区样本为基础的青少年研究(N=151,Mage=10.33 岁,Minage=8.92 岁,Maxage=12.00 岁,51.7%为男性)使用个体中心研究方法,考察了心理生物应激反应对应关系中的内化问题和应对相关的可变性。青少年接受了特里尔社会应激测试,并自我报告了负性情绪(NA)和唾液皮质醇(SC)水平。多轨迹建模显示了四个亚组。与 In-Touch(即中等 NA-中等 SC;n=65)相比,Unmindful(即中等 NA-低 SC;n=49)更有可能出现父母报告的但不是自我报告的内化问题;警惕(即高 NA-低 SC;n=13)更有可能出现自我和父母报告的内化问题,不太可能使用参与应对,更有可能使用如意思维(例如,“我希望问题会消失。”);否认(即低 NA-高 SC;n=24)自我报告的内化问题相似,但也更有可能依赖否认(例如,“我假装问题不存在。”)。这些发现说明了青少年心理生物对应关系的显著异质性,这对基于应对的预防性干预措施中的多模态评估和结果监测具有重要意义。