• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经改良的日本版医疗保健提供者患者激活量表的内容效度和信度:自我报告的以患者为中心的物理治疗量表的依从性。

Content validity and reliability of the modified Japanese version of the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale: self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy scale.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):3082-3089. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1987602. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1080/09593985.2021.1987602
PMID:34633908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modifications to the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale (HP-PAS), which evaluates attitudes toward the importance of using a patient-centered approach (PCA), are required.

PURPOSE

Content validity and reliabilities of a scale developed from the HP-PAS to evaluate self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy were preliminarily investigated.

METHODS

A total of 86 Japanese physical therapists completed the validity assessments in an anonymous survey. Among them, 53 completed the reliability assessments in a named survey. The HP-PAS was modified to mark the most suitable frequency for each item, creating an 11-point scale. For the validity assessments, the participants assigned each item to a therapist-centered approach or PCA using a 5-point scale. Content validity was considered when the proportion of scores 4 and 5 ("possibly" or "definitely" a PCA) with respect to the total number of scores was > 50%. Ceiling and flooring effects were considered when the response proportions of scores of 10 and 0, respectively, on an 11-point scale were > 20%. Items with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) < 0.4 in the test-retest reliability from the item list were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 20 items, 6 were excluded, developing a 14-item self-reported adherence to a patient-centered physical therapy scale (SAPCPTS), which exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.95, 95% confident intervals [CIs] = 0.93-0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84, 95% CIs = 0.75-0.91).

CONCLUSION

This study identified that the 14-item SAPCPTS demonstrated preliminary evidence of content validity and reliability.

摘要

背景

需要对评估使用以患者为中心方法(PCA)重要性的医疗保健提供者患者激活量表(HP-PAS)进行修改。

目的

初步研究了从 HP-PAS 开发的量表评估自我报告的对以患者为中心的物理治疗的依从性的内容效度和信度。

方法

共有 86 名日本物理治疗师在匿名调查中完成了有效性评估。其中,53 人在实名调查中完成了可靠性评估。HP-PAS 经过修改,为每个项目标记了最合适的频率,创建了 11 分制。在有效性评估中,参与者使用 5 分制将每个项目分配给治疗师为中心的方法或 PCA。当总分中得分为 4 和 5(“可能”或“肯定”是 PCA)的比例> 50%时,认为具有内容效度。当 11 分制的得分 10 和 0 的响应比例分别> 20%时,认为存在天花板和地板效应。在测试-重测信度中,项目列表中的 ICC<0.4 的项目被排除在外。

结果

在 20 个项目中,有 6 个被排除在外,开发了一个 14 项自我报告的对以患者为中心的物理治疗的依从性量表(SAPCPTS),该量表表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's = 0.95,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.93-0.96)和测试-重测信度(ICC = 0.84,95% CI = 0.75-0.91)。

结论

本研究表明,14 项 SAPCPTS 具有初步的内容效度和信度证据。

相似文献

1
Content validity and reliability of the modified Japanese version of the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale: self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy scale.经改良的日本版医疗保健提供者患者激活量表的内容效度和信度:自我报告的以患者为中心的物理治疗量表的依从性。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):3082-3089. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1987602. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study.日本物理治疗师自我报告的以患者为中心的物理治疗量表依从性的 Rasch 分析:横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910282.
3
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》(RAQ)日语版的心理测量学特性:一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.
4
The Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool in Nursing Homes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version.养老院以患者为中心的护理评估工具:意大利语版本的心理计量学评估。
J Nurs Meas. 2020 Dec 1;28(3):555-563. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-18-00090. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Reliability and validity of a 12-item medication adherence scale for patients with chronic disease in Japan.日本慢性病患者12项药物依从性量表的信度和效度
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3380-7.
6
Development of a Japanese version of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Examination of its reliability and validity.发展日本版的预先医疗照护计划参与度调查问卷:信度和效度检验。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Jun;19(3):341-347. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001108.
7
Development of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Japanese version through factor analysis and test-retest reliability.通过因素分析和重测信度检验开发工作联盟量表-短式日本版。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Mar;36(3):444-449. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1487492. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.双相障碍知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中文版 Morisky 药物依从性量表八条目版在系统性红斑狼疮中国患者中的信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2713-2720. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06195-y. Epub 2022 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study.日本物理治疗师自我报告的以患者为中心的物理治疗量表依从性的 Rasch 分析:横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910282.