Department of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):3082-3089. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1987602. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Modifications to the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale (HP-PAS), which evaluates attitudes toward the importance of using a patient-centered approach (PCA), are required.
Content validity and reliabilities of a scale developed from the HP-PAS to evaluate self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy were preliminarily investigated.
A total of 86 Japanese physical therapists completed the validity assessments in an anonymous survey. Among them, 53 completed the reliability assessments in a named survey. The HP-PAS was modified to mark the most suitable frequency for each item, creating an 11-point scale. For the validity assessments, the participants assigned each item to a therapist-centered approach or PCA using a 5-point scale. Content validity was considered when the proportion of scores 4 and 5 ("possibly" or "definitely" a PCA) with respect to the total number of scores was > 50%. Ceiling and flooring effects were considered when the response proportions of scores of 10 and 0, respectively, on an 11-point scale were > 20%. Items with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) < 0.4 in the test-retest reliability from the item list were excluded.
Of the 20 items, 6 were excluded, developing a 14-item self-reported adherence to a patient-centered physical therapy scale (SAPCPTS), which exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.95, 95% confident intervals [CIs] = 0.93-0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84, 95% CIs = 0.75-0.91).
This study identified that the 14-item SAPCPTS demonstrated preliminary evidence of content validity and reliability.
需要对评估使用以患者为中心方法(PCA)重要性的医疗保健提供者患者激活量表(HP-PAS)进行修改。
初步研究了从 HP-PAS 开发的量表评估自我报告的对以患者为中心的物理治疗的依从性的内容效度和信度。
共有 86 名日本物理治疗师在匿名调查中完成了有效性评估。其中,53 人在实名调查中完成了可靠性评估。HP-PAS 经过修改,为每个项目标记了最合适的频率,创建了 11 分制。在有效性评估中,参与者使用 5 分制将每个项目分配给治疗师为中心的方法或 PCA。当总分中得分为 4 和 5(“可能”或“肯定”是 PCA)的比例> 50%时,认为具有内容效度。当 11 分制的得分 10 和 0 的响应比例分别> 20%时,认为存在天花板和地板效应。在测试-重测信度中,项目列表中的 ICC<0.4 的项目被排除在外。
在 20 个项目中,有 6 个被排除在外,开发了一个 14 项自我报告的对以患者为中心的物理治疗的依从性量表(SAPCPTS),该量表表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's = 0.95,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.93-0.96)和测试-重测信度(ICC = 0.84,95% CI = 0.75-0.91)。
本研究表明,14 项 SAPCPTS 具有初步的内容效度和信度证据。