Niemi M L, Ainamo J, Etemadzadeh H
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Aug;13(7):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00869.x.
A clinical trial was designed to test the relative numbers of gingival lesions caused during standardized brushing of the teeth of 22 volunteer dental nurse students with a manual soft multitufted, a manual soft V-shaped, and an electric toothbrush. First, the left or the right side of the jaws of each subject was brushed by a dental hygienist using the manual V-shaped or the electric brush, and the other side using the manual multitufted brush. At the 2nd brushing 1 week later, the same hygienist used the multitufted brush for brushing the side contralateral to the one in which it was used the 1st week and the V-shaped manual brush instead of the electric and vice versa. After each brushing, the number of new gingival lesions was recorded and the cleansing effect evaluated by assessment of the amount of remaining plaque. This examiner was unaware of the type of brush used. The V-shaped manual toothbrush was found to have caused more gingival abrasion than the electric toothbrush (P less than 0.005) and a similar difference was found between the multitufted manual and the electric toothbrush (P less than 0.05). There was no clinically significant difference between the plaque removing effects of the 3 brushes tested.
设计了一项临床试验,以测试22名志愿牙科护理专业学生使用手动软毛多簇牙刷、手动软毛V形牙刷和电动牙刷在标准刷牙过程中引起的牙龈损伤的相对数量。首先,由一名牙科保健员使用手动V形牙刷或电动牙刷为每个受试者的一侧颌骨刷牙,另一侧使用手动多簇牙刷。在1周后的第二次刷牙时,同一名保健员使用多簇牙刷为与第一周使用侧对侧的一侧刷牙,并用V形手动牙刷代替电动牙刷,反之亦然。每次刷牙后,记录新出现的牙龈损伤数量,并通过评估残留牙菌斑量来评估清洁效果。该检查者不知道所使用的牙刷类型。发现V形手动牙刷比电动牙刷造成更多的牙龈磨损(P小于0.005),并且在多簇手动牙刷和电动牙刷之间也发现了类似差异(P小于0.05)。所测试的三种牙刷在去除牙菌斑效果方面没有临床显著差异。