School of Dentistry, Federal University Pelotas (UFPel), Rua Gonçalves Chaves, 457, Pelotas, RS, 96015-560, Brazil.
Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, State University of Ceará (UECE), Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, 60714-903, Brazil.
Odontology. 2022 Apr;110(2):376-392. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00660-x. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
This study aimed to systematically review the literature about the virucidal efficacy of CHX in comparison to other substances used in the oral cavity. Electronic searches were performed in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science). Only studies that presented the following characteristics were included: (1) verified virucidal efficacy of CHX against Herpes Simplex Type-1 (HSV-1), any Influenza, or any human coronavirus (HcoV); and (2) compared the virucidal efficacy of CHX with essential oils (Listerine), quaternary ammonium compounds, povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide, negative control substance, and absence of therapy. Two researchers independently selected the studies, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. A narrative data synthesis was used. Twenty-five studies were included, of which 21 were in vitro and four were randomized clinical trials (RCT). Studies assessed the virucidal efficacy of CHX against Herpes Simplex Type-1 (HSV-1) (10 studies), Influenza A (InfluA) (4 studies), human coronavirus (HCoV) (4 studies) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) (11 studies). Most studies demonstrated that CHX has a positive virucidal efficacy against HSV-1 and InfluA strains. However, lower efficacy was shown to InfluA strain in comparison to povidone-iodine. Lower to none virucidal efficacy of CHX is expected for HCoV and SARS-CoV-2 strains for in vitro studies. Three RCT demonstrated that CHX was able to significantly reduce the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 for a short period. CHX may present an interesting virucidal efficacy against HSV-1 and InfluA viruses. CHX also presents transient efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 when used as a mouthwash.
本研究旨在系统地综述有关 CHX 的病毒杀灭效果的文献,将其与口腔中使用的其他物质进行比较。在四个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science)中进行了电子检索。仅纳入具有以下特征的研究:(1)验证 CHX 对单纯疱疹病毒-1(HSV-1)、任何流感病毒或任何人类冠状病毒(HcoV)的病毒杀灭效果;(2)比较 CHX 与洗必泰(Listerine)、季铵化合物、聚维酮碘、过氧化氢、阴性对照物质和无治疗的病毒杀灭效果。两名研究人员独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用叙述性数据综合方法。纳入了 25 项研究,其中 21 项为体外研究,4 项为随机临床试验(RCT)。研究评估了 CHX 对单纯疱疹病毒-1(HSV-1)(10 项研究)、甲型流感(InfluA)(4 项研究)、人类冠状病毒(HCoV)(4 项研究)和严重急性呼吸系统综合征相关冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)(11 项研究)的病毒杀灭效果。大多数研究表明,CHX 对 HSV-1 和 InfluA 株具有积极的病毒杀灭效果。然而,与聚维酮碘相比,CHX 对 InfluA 株的效果较低。体外研究中,CHX 对 HCoV 和 SARS-CoV-2 株的病毒杀灭效果较低或无。三项 RCT 表明,CHX 能在短时间内显著降低 SARS-CoV-2 的病毒载量。CHX 对 HSV-1 和 InfluA 病毒可能具有有趣的病毒杀灭效果。CHX 作为漱口水使用时,对 SARS-CoV-2 也具有短暂的疗效。