• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健中的团队合作:一项混合方法研究。

Teamworking in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.

机构信息

UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), Health Sciences Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 1;18(19):10371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910371.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph181910371
PMID:34639671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8508523/
Abstract

The widespread impact of COVID-19 on healthcare has demanded new ways of working across many organisation types and many forms of healthcare delivery while at the same time endeavouring to place minimal, or no, additional burden on already strained healthcare teams. This is a cross-sectional mixed-method study which captured the experiences of teamwork during the COVID-19 pandemic contributing to successful collaboration. We hypothesised that work engagement and psychological safety separately contribute to collective leadership and organisational citizenship behaviours. Participants were healthcare staff on active duty during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland ( = 152) who responded to our social media (Twitter) invitation to participate in this study. Survey and free-text responses were collected through an online platform. Structural equation modelling examined the relationships between work engagement and psychological safety, and collective leadership and OCBs. Open text responses relating to experiences of teamworking during the pandemic were analysed for latent themes. From the survey data, the structural model demonstrated excellent statistical fit indicating that psychological safety, but not work engagement, was predictive of collective leadership and OCBs. From the qualitative data, two key themes were generated: (1) Contrasting experiences of working in a team during the pandemic; and (2) The pandemic response: a tipping point for burnout. This study offers a valuable starting point to explore the factors driving change and the shift to more collective ways of working observed in response to COVID-19. Future studies should use longitudinal data to capture the temporal relationship of these variables which could be moderated by prolonged pressure to healthcare staff during the pandemic.

摘要

COVID-19 对医疗保健的广泛影响要求许多组织类型和多种医疗保健提供形式采用新的工作方式,同时努力将最小或无额外负担施加到已经紧张的医疗保健团队上。这是一项横断面混合方法研究,旨在捕捉 COVID-19 大流行期间团队合作的经验,以促成成功的协作。我们假设工作投入和心理安全感分别有助于集体领导和组织公民行为。参与者是爱尔兰 COVID-19 大流行期间现役的医疗保健人员(n=152),他们响应了我们在社交媒体(Twitter)上的邀请,参与了这项研究。通过在线平台收集了调查和自由文本回复。结构方程模型检验了工作投入和心理安全感与集体领导和 OCB 之间的关系。与大流行期间团队合作经验相关的开放文本回复进行了潜在主题分析。从调查数据来看,结构模型显示出极好的统计拟合度,表明心理安全感而不是工作投入可以预测集体领导和 OCB。从定性数据中,生成了两个关键主题:(1)大流行期间团队合作的不同体验;(2)大流行应对:倦怠的转折点。这项研究为探索推动变革的因素以及为应对 COVID-19 而观察到的向更集体的工作方式转变提供了一个有价值的起点。未来的研究应该使用纵向数据来捕捉这些变量的时间关系,这些关系可能会受到大流行期间对医疗保健人员的长期压力的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c7/8508523/0c8952d116e2/ijerph-18-10371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c7/8508523/0c8952d116e2/ijerph-18-10371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c7/8508523/0c8952d116e2/ijerph-18-10371-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Teamworking in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健中的团队合作:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 1;18(19):10371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910371.
2
Who's more vulnerable? A generational investigation of COVID-19 perceptions' effect on Organisational citizenship Behaviours in the MENA region: job insecurity, burnout and job satisfaction as mediators.谁更脆弱?代际调查 COVID-19 认知对中东和北非地区组织公民行为的影响:工作不安全感、倦怠和工作满意度作为中介。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1951. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11976-2.
3
Lived experiences of healthcare workers on the front line during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的前线生活体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e053680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053680.
4
The Initial Positive and Negative Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rural Healthcare Providers: Associations With Team Culture and Leadership.COVID-19 大流行对农村医疗保健提供者的最初积极和消极影响:与团队文化和领导力的关联。
J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(5):396-406. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00258.
5
How has COVID-19 affected mental health nurses and the delivery of mental health nursing care in the UK? Results of a mixed-methods study.新冠疫情如何影响了英国的心理健康护士和心理健康护理服务的提供?一项混合方法研究的结果。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;28(2):126-137. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12745. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
6
New Ways of Working? A Rapid Exploration of Emerging Evidence Regarding the Care of Older People during COVID19.新的工作方式?对 COVID-19 期间老年人护理的新兴证据的快速探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;17(18):6442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186442.
7
Perceptions of who is in the healthcare team? A content analysis of social media posts during COVID-19 pandemic.人们对医疗团队成员的看法?对 COVID-19 大流行期间社交媒体帖子的内容分析。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):622-632. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1819779. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Healthcare leaders' use of innovative solutions to ensure resilience in healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Norwegian nursing homes and home care services.医疗保健领导者在新冠疫情期间使用创新解决方案确保医疗保健的韧性:挪威疗养院和家庭护理服务中的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 27;21(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06923-1.
9
Occupational Disruptions during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Association with Healthcare Workers' Mental Health.新冠疫情期间的职业中断及其与医护人员心理健康的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179263.
10
The experiences of cooperation among healthcare workers who participated in COVID-19 aid mission in China: A qualitative study.中国参与 COVID-19 援助任务的医护人员合作经验:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Sep;30(17-18):2696-2707. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15774. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Health systems science and systems thinking: qualitative evaluation of preclinical medical student reflections in a role-play simulation game.卫生系统科学与系统思维:在角色扮演模拟游戏中对临床前医学生反思的定性评估
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07594-w.
2
Why they come, why they stay and why they leave: a survey to understand the drivers of recruitment, retention, and attrition of allied health clinicians in an Australian metropolitan health network.他们为何而来、为何留下以及为何离开:一项旨在了解澳大利亚大都市卫生网络中辅助医疗临床医生招聘、留用和流失驱动因素的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 28;25(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12922-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare Professionals Experience of Psychological Safety, Voice, and Silence.医疗保健专业人员对心理安全、表达意见和沉默的体验。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 19;12:626689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626689. eCollection 2021.
2
New Ways of Working? A Rapid Exploration of Emerging Evidence Regarding the Care of Older People during COVID19.新的工作方式?对 COVID-19 期间老年人护理的新兴证据的快速探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;17(18):6442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186442.
3
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data.
Barriers and facilitators of HIV treatment services among men who have sex with men during COVID-19 lockdown.
新冠疫情封锁期间男男性行为者中艾滋病治疗服务的障碍与促进因素
South Afr J HIV Med. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):1670. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v26i1.1670. eCollection 2025.
4
Conceptualising wellbeing among health-care workers during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间医护人员的幸福感概念化研究
Health (London). 2025 May;29(3):335-354. doi: 10.1177/13634593241279206. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
5
Measuring Team Functioning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Cancer Care Team Members.衡量新冠疫情期间的团队运作:癌症护理团队成员的观点
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 27;17:2623-2633. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S448985. eCollection 2024.
6
Healthcare team resilience during COVID-19: a qualitative study.新冠疫情期间医疗团队的韧性:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10895-3.
7
Lived experiences of South African rehabilitation practitioners during coronavirus disease 2019.2019年冠状病毒病期间南非康复从业者的生活经历
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Jan 12;13:1229. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1229. eCollection 2024.
8
Compassionate Nursing Care for COVID-19 Patients in the ICU in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A Lived Experience Study.沙特阿拉伯西部地区重症监护病房中对新冠肺炎患者的人文关怀护理:一项亲历体验研究
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46954. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
COVID-19 community assessment hubs in Ireland: A study of staff and patient perceptions of their value.爱尔兰的 COVID-19 社区评估中心:对其价值的员工和患者感知研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):119-131. doi: 10.1111/hex.13603. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
10
An evaluation of the impact of the Coronavirus (COVID 19) pandemic on interventional radiographers' wellbeing.评估冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行对介入放射技师健康的影响。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2022 Sep;53(3):384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 18.
探索医疗团队中的心理安全感,以为干预措施的制定提供信息:结合观察、调查和访谈数据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z.
4
Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: developing an observational measure to complement survey methods.测量医疗团队中的心理安全感:开发一种观察性测量工具,以补充调查方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01066-z.
5
Implementation science in times of Covid-19.Covid-19 时期的实施科学。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01006-x.
6
Quality and safety in the time of Coronavirus: design better, learn faster.新冠疫情时期的质量和安全:设计更优,学习更快。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 5;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa051.
7
Identifying the context, mechanisms and outcomes underlying collective leadership in teams: building a realist programme theory.识别团队集体领导背后的背景、机制和结果:构建一个现实主义的方案理论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05129-1.
8
From 'them' to 'us': bridging group boundaries through team inclusiveness.从“他们”到“我们”:通过团队包容跨越群体界限。
Med Educ. 2019 Aug;53(8):756-758. doi: 10.1111/medu.13918. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.理解模型大小对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Principles of confounder selection.混杂因素选择原则。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.