Emodi-Perlman Alona, Manfredini Daniele, Shalev Tamar, Bracci Alessandro, Frideman-Rubin Pessia, Eli Ilana
The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6139001, Israel.
School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical Technologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4447. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194447.
The issue of psychosocial factors and concurrent conditions associated with AB is a relatively new approach in the study of Awake Bruxism (AB). In the present study a population of 84 dental students were assessed for probable AB with two modes of AB assessment: Single point self-report (SR) and ecological momentary assessment through a designated smartphone application (BA). The two assessment modes were compared with regard to their ability to phenotype subjects as far as the following psychosocial and behavioral variables are concerned: Gender; depression; somatization; oral behaviors; chronic pain and associated pain symptoms in the head, neck and scapula. Two-way ANOVA showed main effect of SR for the following variables: Chronic Pain Intensity score (F = 6.441, < 0.02), migraine/headache (F = 7.396, < 0.01), pain in neck (F = 6.726, < 0.05), pain in scapula (F = 8.546, < 0.005) and the oral behaviors of pushing the tongue forcefully against the teeth (F = 5.222, < 0.05) and inserting the tongue between the upper and lower teeth (F = 5.344, < 0.03). The effect of SR on the habit of chewing gum was borderline (F = 3.369, = 0.07). Main effect of BA was found for depression (F = 6.049, < 0.05), while the effect of BA on somatization was borderline (F = 3.657, = 0.059). An interaction between SR and BA groups could be observed for the behavior of biting, chewing or playing with the tongue, cheeks or lips (F = 4.117, < 0.05). The results suggest that a combination of a single-point self-report referring to the past 30 days, and an ecological momentary assessment supplying information about the actual timing of the report, can help us to better assess AB, as well as increase our ability to define the phenotype of subjects with AB as far as psychosocial and behavioral factors are concerned.
心理社会因素以及与磨牙症相关的并发状况这一问题,是清醒磨牙症(AB)研究中一种相对较新的方法。在本研究中,对84名牙科专业学生进行了评估,采用两种磨牙症评估模式来确定其是否可能患有磨牙症:单点自我报告(SR)以及通过指定智能手机应用程序进行的生态瞬时评估(BA)。就以下心理社会和行为变量而言,对这两种评估模式将受试者表型化的能力进行了比较:性别;抑郁;躯体化;口腔行为;慢性疼痛以及头部、颈部和肩胛骨处的相关疼痛症状。双向方差分析显示,SR对以下变量有主要影响:慢性疼痛强度评分(F = 6.441,P < 0.02)、偏头痛/头痛(F = 7.396,P < 0.01)、颈部疼痛(F = 6.726,P < 0.05)、肩胛骨疼痛(F = 8.546,P < 0.005)以及用力将舌头抵住牙齿(F = 5.222,P < 0.05)和将舌头插入上下牙齿之间(F = 5.344,P < 0.03)的口腔行为。SR对嚼口香糖习惯的影响处于临界状态(F = 3.369,P = 0.07)。发现BA对抑郁有主要影响(F = 6.049,P < 0.05),而BA对躯体化的影响处于临界状态(F = 3.657,P = 0.059)。对于咬、嚼或玩弄舌头、脸颊或嘴唇的行为,可观察到SR组和BA组之间存在交互作用(F = 4.117,P < 0.05)。结果表明,结合一份关于过去30天的单点自我报告以及提供报告实际时间信息的生态瞬时评估,能够帮助我们更好地评估磨牙症,同时增强我们在心理社会和行为因素方面定义磨牙症患者表型的能力。