• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间的非正式护理:德国大流行第二波期间一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究结果。

Informal caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a representative, population-based study during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2022 Oct;26(10):2062-2070. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1989377. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2021.1989377
PMID:34644202
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the informal caregiving situation in terms of prevalence of caregivers, infection rates, perception of impairment and danger by the pandemic, and changes in the caregiving performance among long-term caregivers from before to during the peak of the pandemic.

METHODS

Informal caregivers ( = 489 during the pandemic) from a population-based sample, representative for individuals aged ≥40 years from Germany ( = 3022, assessed March 2021), were questioned. Sociodemographic information, prevalence and performance of informal care before and during the second pandemic wave, infection rates and perceived impairment and danger of the pandemic were assessed.

RESULTS

Results indicate no significantly different prevalence of informal caregiving during the pandemic compared to before. Few caregivers and few of their care recipients were infected. Overall, a low to moderate level of impairment was reported by caregivers, but a moderately high perceived danger, particularly for care recipients. Among long-term caregivers, caregiving intensity and time increased during the pandemic, less ambulatory care but more shopping help was used and care task distribution and use of support changed.

CONCLUSION

While the prevalence of informal caregivers remained unchanged, the caregiving situation worsened among long-term caregivers. Infection rates among caregivers were low, but they perceived themselves and their care recipients to be endangered. Future research and policy should focus more on this vulnerable group during a health crisis, primarily on long-term caregivers, in order to effectively support them in their care provision for the high risk group of older care recipients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查 COVID-19 大流行如何影响非正式照护情况,包括照护者的流行率、感染率、对大流行的损伤和危险的感知,以及长期照护者在大流行高峰期前后的照护表现的变化。

方法

从德国一个基于人群的样本中抽取了 489 名非正式照护者( = 在大流行期间)进行调查。调查内容包括社会人口统计学信息、大流行前和大流行期间非正式照护的流行率和表现、感染率以及对大流行的损伤和危险的感知。

结果

结果表明,大流行期间非正式照护的流行率与大流行前相比没有显著差异。很少有照护者及其照护对象感染。总体而言,照护者报告的损伤程度较低,但感知到的危险程度较高,尤其是对照护对象。在长期照护者中,照护强度和时间在大流行期间增加了,使用的非流动性照护减少了,但购物帮助增加了,照护任务分配和支持使用发生了变化。

结论

虽然非正式照护者的流行率保持不变,但长期照护者的照护情况恶化了。照护者的感染率较低,但他们认为自己和他们的照护对象处于危险之中。未来的研究和政策应该更加关注这一脆弱群体,尤其是长期照护者,以便在健康危机期间为高风险的老年照护对象提供有效的支持。

相似文献

1
Informal caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a representative, population-based study during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany.COVID-19 大流行期间的非正式护理:德国大流行第二波期间一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究结果。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Oct;26(10):2062-2070. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1989377. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Gender Differences in Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Caregiver Burden among Informal Caregivers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Representative, Population-Based Study.德国第二波 COVID-19 大流行期间非正式照护者的心理健康、生活质量和照护者负担的性别差异:一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究。
Gerontology. 2023;69(2):149-162. doi: 10.1159/000523846. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Mental health, social integration and support of informal caregivers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A population-based representative study from Germany.心理健康、社会融合和非正式照护者在 COVID-19 大流行第二波期间的支持:来自德国的一项基于人群的代表性研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Nov;114:105085. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105085. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic perceive additional burden: findings from an ad-hoc survey in Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非正式护理人员感受到了额外的负担:来自德国一项特别调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06359-7.
5
Are informal caregivers more likely to believe in conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic?: Findings of a representative study from Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非专业护理人员是否更有可能相信阴谋论?:来自德国的一项代表性研究结果。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Mar;27(3):588-594. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2102141. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Impact of a COVID-19-Related Lockdown on the Experience of Informal Caregiving in Singapore.新冠疫情相关封锁措施对新加坡非正式护理体验的影响。
Gerontology. 2024;70(1):102-114. doi: 10.1159/000534723. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
7
[The situation of informal caregivers of working age in the COVID-19 pandemic-results of an online survey in Germany].[新冠疫情期间德国在职年龄非正式照料者的状况——一项在线调查结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Mar;66(3):265-274. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03659-7. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Caregiving Situation as a Predictor of Subjective Caregiver Burden: Informal Caregivers of Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.作为主观照顾负担预测因素的照顾情况:COVID-19 大流行期间老年患者的非正式照顾者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114496.
9
Informal care in times of a public health crisis: Objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life of caregivers in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.突发公共卫生危机时期的非正式照护:新冠疫情期间荷兰照护者的客观负担、主观负担和生活质量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5515-e5526. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13975. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
10
Conspiracy mentality among informal caregivers as a risk factor for caregiver burden, mental health, perceived loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of a representative online study from Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非正式护理人员的阴谋心态是导致护理人员负担、心理健康、孤独感和社会隔离的风险因素:来自德国的一项具有代表性的在线研究结果。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Nov;31(11):3139-3151. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03177-0. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Type and efficacy of online training for informal carers: a narrative review.非正式护理人员在线培训的类型与效果:一项叙述性综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1603020. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1603020. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term care need, loneliness, and perceived social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the German Ageing Survey.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的长期护理需求、孤独感和感知到的社会隔离:来自德国老龄化调查的证据。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1377-1384. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02411-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
Supporting Physical Activity for Informal Caregivers during and beyond COVID-19: Exploring the Feasibility, Usability and Acceptability of a Digital Health Smartphone Application, 'CareFit'.
支持 COVID-19 期间和之后非正式照护者的身体活动:探索数字健康智能手机应用 'CareFit' 的可行性、可用性和可接受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912506.
4
Caring in the time of COVID-19, longitudinal trends in well-being and mental health in carers in Ireland: Evidence from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).在 COVID-19 期间的关爱:爱尔兰照顾者幸福感和心理健康的纵向趋势:来自爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)的证据。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Sep-Oct;102:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104719. Epub 2022 May 10.