Institute for Research and Innovation, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, WA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;9:711460. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.711460. eCollection 2021.
International studies suggest that males may be less likely to adhere to SARS-CoV-2 transmission mitigation efforts than females. However, there is a paucity of research in this field in the United States. The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationship of binary gender identity (female/male) with beliefs, attitudes, and pandemic-related practices in the early stages of the pandemic. This study is based on a cross-sectional, voluntary response survey. Patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between March 5 and June 7, 2020 were invited to participate. All patients were tested within a large community healthcare system that serves patients through eight hospitals and hundreds of clinics across Washington State. Bivariate associations between gender and various demographics were tested using Chi-squared and Student's -tests. We examined associations between gender and pandemic-related beliefs, attitudes, and practices using multivariable logistic regression, accounting for potential confounding factors. Females were more likely than males to agree that they (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.14-2.00) or their families (aOR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.31-2.33) were threatened by SARS-CoV-2, or that their own behavior could impact transmission (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.49-3.15). Similarly, females were more likely to agree that social distancing (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.19-2.46), handwashing (aOR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.06-5.21), and masking (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.94) were necessary to slow SARS-CoV-2 spread. Females were significantly less likely to visit outside of their social distancing circle (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.81), but among those who did, practices of social distancing (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI 0.89-2.23), remaining outdoors (aOR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.40), and masking (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.74-1.93) were comparable to males, while females practiced handwashing more than males (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.33-3.34). Our study suggests that gender disparate beliefs, attitudes, and practices existed in the early stages of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Efforts should be tailored to encourage males to engage with mitigation efforts in ongoing pandemic-related public health campaigns.
国际研究表明,男性可能比女性更不愿意遵守 SARS-CoV-2 传播缓解措施。然而,在美国,这方面的研究很少。本研究的主要目的是探讨二元性别认同(女性/男性)与信仰、态度和大流行早期相关做法之间的关系。本研究基于横断面、自愿应答调查。邀请 2020 年 3 月 5 日至 6 月 7 日期间接受 SARS-CoV-2 检测的患者参加。所有患者均在一家大型社区医疗保健系统内接受检测,该系统通过华盛顿州的 8 家医院和数百家诊所为患者提供服务。使用卡方检验和学生 t 检验测试性别与各种人口统计学特征之间的双变量关联。我们使用多变量逻辑回归检查了性别与大流行相关的信仰、态度和实践之间的关联,考虑了潜在的混杂因素。与男性相比,女性更有可能认为自己(优势比[OR] = 1.51,95%置信区间[CI]:1.14-2.00)或其家人(OR = 1.75,95% CI:1.31-2.33)受到 SARS-CoV-2 的威胁,或者他们自己的行为可能会影响传播(OR = 2.17,95% CI:1.49-3.15)。同样,女性更有可能同意社交距离(OR = 1.72,95% CI:1.19-2.46)、洗手(OR = 3.27,95% CI:2.06-5.21)和戴口罩(OR = 1.41,95% CI:1.02-1.94)是减缓 SARS-CoV-2 传播所必需的。女性外出(OR = 0.62,95% CI:0.47-0.81)的可能性显著低于其社交距离圈,但在外出的女性中,社交距离(OR = 1.41,95% CI:0.89-2.23)、户外活动(OR = 0.89,95% CI:0.56-1.40)和戴口罩(OR = 1.19,95% CI:0.74-1.93)的做法与男性相似,而女性的洗手频率高于男性(OR = 2.11,95% CI:1.33-3.34)。我们的研究表明,在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的早期阶段,存在性别差异的信仰、态度和做法。应该采取措施,鼓励男性参与正在进行的大流行相关公共卫生运动中的缓解工作。