Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Oct 14;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00547-8.
In recent decades, several political, legislative, judicial, consumer, and commercial processes around the world have advanced legalization efforts for the use of medical cannabis (MC). As the use of MC evolves through legislative reform, with an increase in public acceptance and therapeutic potential, a need exists to further investigate the facilitators and barriers to MC regulation.
A scoping review was conducted to identify the facilitators and barriers associated with the implementation of MC regulations. MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched; no restrictions were placed on geographic location/jurisdiction. Eligible articles included those that evaluated the MC regulatory framework of one or more countries.
Twenty-two articles were deemed eligible and included in this review. Themes identified include: (1) effects of conflicts, mindset, and ideology of state population, (2) the use of comparisons to analyze MC regulation, and (3) the need for more knowledge, advice, and empirical/clinical evidence to inform future MC policies.
Policymakers should be aware of facilitators to the MC regulation implementation process, such as the influence of state and federal congruence, increased transparency, and the incorporation of stakeholder concerns, in order to effectively respond to a growing societal acceptance of MC and its use among patients. Given a comprehensive understanding of these influential factors, policymakers may be better equipped to meet the consumer and commercial demands of a rapidly evolving MC regulatory environment.
近几十年来,全球范围内出现了一些政治、立法、司法、消费者和商业进程,这些进程都推动了医用大麻(MC)使用的合法化。随着立法改革推动 MC 使用的发展,公众接受度和治疗潜力不断增加,因此需要进一步研究 MC 监管的促进因素和障碍。
进行了范围综述,以确定与 MC 法规实施相关的促进因素和障碍。系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、AMED 和 PsycINFO 数据库;未对地理位置/司法管辖区施加任何限制。符合条件的文章包括评估一个或多个国家的 MC 监管框架的文章。
有 22 篇文章被认为符合条件并包含在本次综述中。确定的主题包括:(1)国家人口冲突、心态和意识形态的影响,(2)利用比较来分析 MC 监管,以及(3)需要更多的知识、建议和经验/临床证据来为未来的 MC 政策提供信息。
政策制定者应该意识到 MC 监管实施过程中的促进因素,例如州和联邦一致性的影响、增加透明度以及纳入利益相关者的关注,以便有效应对医用大麻日益被社会接受以及患者对其使用的增加。在全面了解这些影响因素的情况下,政策制定者可能会更好地满足医用大麻监管环境快速发展的消费者和商业需求。