• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情对美国的流行病学和经济影响。

Epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 in the US.

机构信息

Network Systems Science and Advanced Computing Division, Biocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.

Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z
PMID:34650141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8517017/
Abstract

This research measures the epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 spread in the US under different mitigation scenarios, comprising of non-pharmaceutical interventions. A detailed disease model of COVID-19 is combined with a model of the US economy to estimate the direct impact of labor supply shock to each sector arising from morbidity, mortality, and lockdown, as well as the indirect impact caused by the interdependencies between sectors. During a lockdown, estimates of jobs that are workable from home in each sector are used to modify the shock to labor supply. Results show trade-offs between economic losses, and lives saved and infections averted are non-linear in compliance to social distancing and the duration of the lockdown. Sectors that are worst hit are not the labor-intensive sectors such as the Agriculture sector and the Construction sector, but the ones with high valued jobs such as the Professional Services, even after the teleworkability of jobs is accounted for. Additionally, the findings show that a low compliance to interventions can be overcome by a longer shutdown period and vice versa to arrive at similar epidemiological impact but their net effect on economic loss depends on the interplay between the marginal gains from averting infections and deaths, versus the marginal loss from having healthy workers stay at home during the shutdown.

摘要

本研究通过不同缓解方案(包括非药物干预措施),测算 COVID-19 在美国的传播所带来的流行病学和经济影响。COVID-19 的详细疾病模型与美国经济模型相结合,以估算发病、死亡和封锁对各部门劳动力供应冲击的直接影响,以及各部门之间的相互依存关系造成的间接影响。在封锁期间,利用各部门中可远程办公的工作岗位估计数来调整劳动力供应冲击。研究结果表明,遵守社交距离和封锁持续时间的程度与经济损失、挽救生命和避免感染之间的权衡是非线性的。受打击最严重的部门不是劳动密集型部门,如农业部门和建筑部门,而是高价值工作部门,如专业服务部门,即使考虑到工作的远程办公能力也是如此。此外,研究结果表明,通过延长停工时间,可以克服对干预措施的低遵守程度,反之亦然,从而达到类似的流行病学影响,但它们对经济损失的净影响取决于避免感染和死亡的边际收益与停工期间让健康工人待在家里的边际损失之间的相互作用。

相似文献

1
Epidemiological and economic impact of COVID-19 in the US.新冠疫情对美国的流行病学和经济影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99712-z.
2
Epidemiological and Economic Impact of COVID-19 in the US.新冠疫情在美国的流行病学及经济影响。
medRxiv. 2020 Nov 30:2020.11.28.20239517. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.28.20239517.
3
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and Construction Industry: insights from Italian data.SARS-CoV-2 大流行与建筑行业:来自意大利数据的洞察。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022233. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12265.
4
Global economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures stand out in high-frequency shipping data.高频航运数据凸显了 COVID-19 封锁措施对全球经济的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248818. eCollection 2021.
5
COVID-19 outbreak: Impact on global economy.COVID-19 疫情爆发:对全球经济的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;10:1009393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1009393. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessing the Impacts of COVID-19 on the Industrial Sectors and Economy of China.评估 COVID-19 对中国工业部门和经济的影响。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):21-39. doi: 10.1111/risa.13805. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios.瑞典针对非药物缓解和抑制情景的 COVID-19 医疗需求和死亡率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1443-1453. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa121.
8
Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives.基于帕累托的 COVID-19 大流行应对措施的国家评估表明,拯救生命和保护经济不是相互排斥的目标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81869-2.
9
Lives saved and lost in the first six month of the US COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cost-benefit analysis.美国 COVID-19 大流行的头六个月里逝去和幸存的生命:回顾性成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0261759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261759. eCollection 2022.
10
Early public adherence with and support for stay-at-home COVID-19 mitigation strategies despite adverse life impact: a transnational cross-sectional survey study in the United States and Australia.尽管对生活产生了不利影响,公众仍早期坚持并支持 COVID-19 居家缓解策略:一项针对美国和澳大利亚的跨国横断面调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10410-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological distress and compliance with sanitary measures during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的心理困扰与卫生措施的遵守情况
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0317272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317272. eCollection 2025.
2
Existence and stability of equilibria in infectious disease dynamics with behavioral feedback.具有行为反馈的传染病动力学中平衡点的存在性与稳定性
Phys Rev E. 2025 Jan;111(1-1):014317. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.111.014317.
3
A novel comparison framework for epidemiological strategies applied to age-based restrictions versus horizontal lockdowns.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the effect of Chinese control measures on COVID-19 via temporal reproduction number estimation.通过时间繁殖数估计评估中国控制措施对 COVID-19 的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246715. eCollection 2021.
2
Using input-output analysis to model the impact of pandemic mitigation and suppression measures on the workforce.使用投入产出分析来模拟疫情缓解和抑制措施对劳动力的影响。
Sustain Prod Consum. 2020 Jul;23:249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
The COVID-19 outbreak in Sichuan, China: Epidemiology and impact of interventions.
一种用于比较将基于年龄的限制措施与全面封锁应用于流行病学策略的新型框架。
Infect Dis Model. 2024 Jul 20;9(4):1301-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The macroeconomic impact of a dengue outbreak: Case studies from Thailand and Brazil.登革热疫情的宏观经济影响:来自泰国和巴西的案例研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):e0012201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012201. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Number and nature of psychiatric emergency department visits in a tertiary hospital before, during, and after coronavirus pandemic.三级医院在冠状病毒大流行之前、期间和之后精神科急诊科就诊的数量及性质
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 18;15:1380401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1380401. eCollection 2024.
6
Data-driven scalable pipeline using national agent-based models for real-time pandemic response and decision support.使用基于智能体的国家模型进行实时疫情应对和决策支持的数据驱动可扩展流程。
Int J High Perform Comput Appl. 2023 Jan;37(1):4-27. doi: 10.1177/10943420221127034.
7
Assessing the Impact of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Consumer Mobility Patterns and COVID-19 Transmission in the US.评估非药物干预措施对美国消费者流动性模式和 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 7;21(1):67. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010067.
8
"Life will never be the same": a qualitative analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on adults with a history of insomnia.“生活将从此不同”:对新冠疫情对有失眠病史成年人影响的质性分析
Sleep Adv. 2023 Nov 13;4(1):zpad046. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad046. eCollection 2023.
9
The optimisation of public health emergency governance: a simulation study based on COVID-19 pandemic control policy.优化公共卫生应急治理:基于 COVID-19 疫情防控政策的模拟研究。
Global Health. 2023 Dec 4;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00996-9.
10
Estimating the Treatment and Prophylactic Economic Value of New Antimicrobials in Managing Antibiotic Resistance and Serious Infections for Common Pathogens in the USA: A Population Modelling Study.估算新型抗生素在治疗和预防美国常见病原体引起的抗生素耐药和严重感染方面的治疗和预防经济学价值:一项基于人群的建模研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Mar;42(3):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01337-9. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
中国四川新冠肺炎疫情:流行病学与干预影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Dec 28;16(12):e1008467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008467. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Medical costs of keeping the US economy open during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间保持美国经济开放的医疗费用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75280-6.
5
How many jobs can be done at home?有多少工作可以在家完成?
J Public Econ. 2020 Sep;189:104235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Impact of demographic disparities in social distancing and vaccination on influenza epidemics in urban and rural regions of the United States.人口统计学差异对美国城乡地区社交隔离和疫苗接种对流感流行的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3703-2.
7
Feedback Between Behavioral Adaptations and Disease Dynamics.行为适应与疾病动态之间的反馈。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 20;8(1):12452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30471-0.
8
Epidemiological and economic impact of pandemic influenza in Chicago: Priorities for vaccine interventions.芝加哥大流行性流感的流行病学和经济影响:疫苗干预的优先事项。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 1;13(6):e1005521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005521. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Modeling the impact of interventions on an epidemic of ebola in sierra leone and liberia.模拟干预措施对塞拉利昂和利比里亚埃博拉疫情的影响。
PLoS Curr. 2014 Oct 16;6:ecurrents.outbreaks.fd38dd85078565450b0be3fcd78f5ccf. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.fd38dd85078565450b0be3fcd78f5ccf.
10
Comparing effectiveness of top-down and bottom-up strategies in containing influenza.比较自上而下和自下而上策略在控制流感中的效果。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025149. Epub 2011 Sep 22.