• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对临床研究中使用远程数据采集的态度。

Public attitudes to the use of remote data collection in clinical research.

机构信息

University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106595. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106595. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106595
PMID:34653652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8511885/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented an unprecedented challenge for delivering clinical research. The use of technology-assisted data collection for clinical research is desirable for many practitioners, but the acceptability of use in the general population has not been assessed. The aim of the study was to assess attitudes towards using technology-assisted remote methods in the delivery of clinical research in the UK and to understand the barriers to taking part in research with respect to both remote assessments and traditional research methods across different age ranges.

METHODS

The study was conducted as an online anonymous survey with a 4-part questionnaire, between August 2020 and December 2020. Participants living in the UK aged 18 years and above were eligible to take part.

RESULTS

A total 351 completed the survey and are included in the data analysis. In all age groups, participants identified that use of online assignments, video calls and telephone calls would make them more likely to take part in clinical research. Overall, the largest barrier to taking part in research was time commitments and timing of the appointment. COVID-19 has had a small, positive influence on the confidence of using technology in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that there is a large interest in taking part in research using online, telephone and video call appointments, which could facilitate research delivery in light of ongoing COVID-19-related restrictions and also improve the accessibility and inclusivity of research.

摘要

背景/目的:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)给提供临床研究带来了前所未有的挑战。对于许多从业者来说,使用技术辅助数据收集进行临床研究是可取的,但尚未评估其在普通人群中的可接受性。本研究的目的是评估英国对使用技术辅助远程方法提供临床研究的态度,并了解在不同年龄范围内,对远程评估和传统研究方法参与研究的障碍。

方法

该研究于 2020 年 8 月至 12 月期间以在线匿名调查的形式进行,共包括 4 部分问卷。有资格参加的参与者为居住在英国的 18 岁及以上的成年人。

结果

共有 351 名参与者完成了调查并纳入数据分析。在所有年龄组中,参与者认为使用在线作业、视频通话和电话会使他们更有可能参与临床研究。总体而言,参与研究的最大障碍是时间承诺和预约时间。COVID-19 对普通人群使用技术的信心产生了微小的积极影响。

结论

该研究发现,人们对使用在线、电话和视频通话预约参与研究有很大的兴趣,这可以促进在持续的 COVID-19 相关限制下进行研究,同时也提高了研究的可及性和包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c23/8511885/67768d6e0787/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c23/8511885/75347e36171f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c23/8511885/67768d6e0787/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c23/8511885/75347e36171f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c23/8511885/67768d6e0787/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Public attitudes to the use of remote data collection in clinical research.公众对临床研究中使用远程数据采集的态度。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106595. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106595. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
3
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
4
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
5
A mixed-methods study describing behavioral factors that influenced general practitioners' experiences using triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项混合方法研究,描述了在 COVID-19 大流行期间影响全科医生使用分诊的行为因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 3;22(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01469-x.
6
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
7
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
8
The future is now: our experience starting a remote clinical trial during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.未来已来:我们在 COVID-19 大流行初期启动远程临床试验的经验。
Trials. 2021 Sep 7;22(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05537-6.
9
Remote clinical consultations in restorative dentistry-A survey.修复牙科中的远程临床咨询-调查。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103914. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103914. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.2017年至2023年女性参与心血管试验情况:一项系统评价
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529104. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29104.
2
Matching science to reality: how to deploy a participant-driven digital brain health platform.让科学与现实相匹配:如何部署一个由参与者驱动的数字脑健康平台。
Front Dement. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2023.1135451. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Field based research in the era of the pandemic in resource limited settings: challenges and lessons for the future.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating diversity in European audiences for public engagement with research: Who attends European Researchers' Night in Ireland, the UK and Malta?调查欧洲公众对研究参与的多样性:谁参加了爱尔兰、英国和马耳他的欧洲研究人员之夜?
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0252854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252854. eCollection 2021.
2
A Snapshot of the Response from UK-based Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products to COVID-19.英国针对新冠病毒开展的研究性药物临床试验的响应情况快照。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 23;12(9):e10613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10613.
3
Revolution in UK General Practice Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
资源有限环境下大流行时代的实地研究:未来的挑战与经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;12:1309089. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309089. eCollection 2024.
4
Virtual engagement of under-resourced communities: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic for creating crisis-resistant research infrastructure.资源匮乏社区的虚拟参与:在新冠疫情期间创建抗危机研究基础设施的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr 4;6(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.385. eCollection 2022.
新冠疫情引发的英国全科医疗变革:一项横断面调查
Cureus. 2020 Aug 5;12(8):e9573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9573.
4
Research with older people in a world with COVID-19: identification of current and future priorities, challenges and opportunities.在 COVID-19 世界中对老年人进行研究:确定当前和未来的重点、挑战和机遇。
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):901-906. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa149.
5
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis as Catalyst for Telemedicine for Chronic Neurological Disorders.2019年冠状病毒病危机成为慢性神经疾病远程医疗的催化剂。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):927-928. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1452.
6
Telemedicine and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Lessons for the Future.远程医疗与新冠疫情:未来的经验教训
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):571-573. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.29040.rb. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care.新冠肺炎:基层医疗中的远程评估
BMJ. 2020 Mar 25;368:m1182. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1182.
8
Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.居家远程康复与门诊治疗对中风后成人的疗效:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.
9
National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease.帕金森病虚拟家庭访视的全国随机对照试验。
Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1152-1161. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Baseline participation in a health examination survey of the population 65 years and older: who is missed and why?65岁及以上人群健康检查调查的基线参与情况:哪些人未被纳入,原因何在?
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jan 19;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0185-6.