• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情期间社交距离的动态博弈:非对称解决方案分析

Dynamic Games of Social Distancing During an Epidemic: Analysis of Asymmetric Solutions.

作者信息

Kordonis Ioannis, Lagos Athanasios-Rafail, Papavassilopoulos George P

机构信息

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou str., 157 80 Athens, Greece.

Department of Electrical Engineering-Systems, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089 United States.

出版信息

Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):214-236. doi: 10.1007/s13235-021-00403-1. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13235-021-00403-1
PMID:34659872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8503885/
Abstract

Individual behaviors play an essential role in the dynamics of transmission of infectious diseases, including COVID-19. This paper studies a dynamic game model that describes the social distancing behaviors during an epidemic, assuming a continuum of players and individual infection dynamics. The evolution of the players' infection states follows a variant of the well-known SIR dynamics. We assume that the players are not sure about their infection state, and thus, they choose their actions based on their individually perceived probabilities of being susceptible, infected, or removed. The cost of each player depends both on her infection state and on the contact with others. We prove the existence of a Nash equilibrium and characterize Nash equilibria using nonlinear complementarity problems. We then exploit some monotonicity properties of the optimal policies to obtain a reduced-order characterization for Nash equilibrium and reduce its computation to the solution of a low-dimensional optimization problem. It turns out that, even in the symmetric case, where all the players have the same parameters, players may have very different behaviors. We finally present some numerical studies that illustrate this interesting phenomenon and investigate the effects of several parameters, including the players' vulnerability, the time horizon, and the maximum allowed actions, on the optimal policies and the players' costs.

摘要

个体行为在包括新冠病毒病(COVID - 19)在内的传染病传播动态中起着至关重要的作用。本文研究了一个动态博弈模型,该模型描述了疫情期间的社交距离行为,假设参与者连续且存在个体感染动态。参与者感染状态的演变遵循著名的SIR动态模型的一个变体。我们假设参与者不确定自己的感染状态,因此,他们根据自己对易感、感染或康复的个体感知概率来选择行动。每个参与者的成本既取决于她的感染状态,也取决于与他人的接触。我们证明了纳什均衡的存在性,并使用非线性互补问题对纳什均衡进行了刻画。然后,我们利用最优策略的一些单调性性质来获得纳什均衡的降阶刻画,并将其计算简化为一个低维优化问题的求解。结果表明,即使在所有参与者具有相同参数的对称情况下,参与者的行为也可能非常不同。我们最后给出了一些数值研究,这些研究说明了这一有趣现象,并研究了包括参与者易感性、时间范围和最大允许行动等几个参数对最优策略和参与者成本的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/6b40a916cd85/13235_2021_403_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/7339efe21813/13235_2021_403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/17b84b16c3f5/13235_2021_403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/449dba3c49d9/13235_2021_403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/d63fc02c921c/13235_2021_403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/6919427bf6b0/13235_2021_403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/6b40a916cd85/13235_2021_403_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/7339efe21813/13235_2021_403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/17b84b16c3f5/13235_2021_403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/449dba3c49d9/13235_2021_403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/d63fc02c921c/13235_2021_403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/6919427bf6b0/13235_2021_403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/8503885/6b40a916cd85/13235_2021_403_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Games of Social Distancing During an Epidemic: Analysis of Asymmetric Solutions.疫情期间社交距离的动态博弈:非对称解决方案分析
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):214-236. doi: 10.1007/s13235-021-00403-1. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
An impossibility theorem in game dynamics.博弈动力学中的一个不可能性定理。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2305349120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305349120. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Dynamics to equilibrium in network games: individual behavior and global response.网络博弈中的动态平衡:个体行为与全局响应。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120343. eCollection 2015.
4
Spatial ecology, optimal control and game theoretical fishing problems.空间生态学、最优控制与博弈论捕鱼问题。
J Math Biol. 2022 Oct 19;85(5):55. doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01829-w.
5
Herd Behaviors in Epidemics: A Dynamics-Coupled Evolutionary Games Approach.传染病中的群体行为:一种动力学耦合进化博弈方法。
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):183-213. doi: 10.1007/s13235-022-00433-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
6
Impact of human cooperation on vaccination behaviors.人类合作对疫苗接种行为的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 May 27;9(6):e16748. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16748. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Distributed Robust Seeking of Nash Equilibrium for Networked Games: An Extended State Observer-Based Approach.分布式网络博弈纳什均衡的鲁棒搜索:基于扩展状态观测器的方法。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022 Mar;52(3):1527-1538. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2989755. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
Nash Equilibria in the Response Strategy of Correlated Games.关联博弈中的响应策略中的纳什均衡。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36562-2.
9
The Mask Game with Multiple Populations.具有多个群体的面具游戏。
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):147-167. doi: 10.1007/s13235-022-00431-5. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Nash equilibrium and evolutionary dynamics in semifinalists' dilemma.半决赛选手困境中的纳什均衡与进化动力学
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Apr;91(4):042144. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042144. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning to Mitigate Epidemic Risks: A Dynamic Population Game Approach.学习减轻疫情风险:一种动态人口博弈方法。
Dyn Games Appl. 2023;13(4):1106-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13235-023-00529-4. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
Social distancing as a public-good dilemma for socio-economic cost: An evolutionary game approach.社会距离作为一种社会经济成本的公共物品困境:一种进化博弈方法。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 14;8(11):e11497. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11497. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review.用于流行病传播和人类决策的博弈论框架综述
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):7-48. doi: 10.1007/s13235-022-00428-0. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
Epidemic Spreading and Equilibrium Social Distancing in Heterogeneous Networks.异构网络中的疫情传播与均衡社会距离
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):258-287. doi: 10.1007/s13235-021-00411-1. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
An epidemiological model with voluntary quarantine strategies governed by evolutionary game dynamics.一种具有由进化博弈动力学控制的自愿隔离策略的流行病学模型。
用于流行病传播和人类决策的博弈论框架综述
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):7-48. doi: 10.1007/s13235-022-00428-0. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2021 Feb;143:110616. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110616. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Evolutionary game theory modelling to represent the behavioural dynamics of economic shutdowns and shield immunity in the COVID-19 pandemic.进化博弈论建模,以呈现新冠疫情中经济封锁和屏蔽免疫的行为动态。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 30;7(9):201095. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201095. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Decisions and disease: a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation.决策与疾病:合作进化的一种机制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 4;10(1):13113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69546-2.
6
Game theoretic modelling of infectious disease dynamics and intervention methods: a review.传染病动力学和干预方法的博弈论建模:综述。
J Biol Dyn. 2020 Dec;14(1):57-89. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1720322. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Disease dynamics in a stochastic network game: a little empathy goes a long way in averting outbreaks.随机网络博弈中的疾病动态:多一点同理心可大大避免疫情爆发。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 14;7:44122. doi: 10.1038/srep44122.
8
Risk perception and effectiveness of uncoordinated behavioral responses in an emerging epidemic.突发传染病中不协调行为反应的风险感知和有效性。
Math Biosci. 2012 Aug;238(2):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
Game theory of social distancing in response to an epidemic.传染病疫情下社会隔离的博弈论。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 May 27;6(5):e1000793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000793.
10
Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review.建模人类行为对传染病传播的影响:综述。
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Sep 6;7(50):1247-56. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0142. Epub 2010 May 26.