• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新评估中国影子经济和环境政策严格程度在能源-增长关系中的动态作用。

Re-evaluating the dynamic role of shadow economy and environmental policy stringency in the energy-growth nexus in China.

机构信息

School of Resources, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Wuhan, China.

School of Economics, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):17406-17416. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16967-9. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-16967-9
PMID:34668136
Abstract

This paper examines the impact of shadow economy and environmental policy stringency on energy consumption and economic growth in the case of China for the period 1993 to 2019. Asymmetric ARDL empirical findings show that positive shocks in shadow economy and environmental policy stringency have a significant and positive impact on energy consumption and economic growth in the long run. However, the negative shocks in shadow economy exert positive and significant impacts on energy consumption and economic growth in the long run, but magnitudes are small compared to positive shocks. The long-run findings report no significant effect of negative shock in environmental policy stringency on energy consumption and economic growth. China should use environmental policy stringency as economic tools to maintain green economic growth and clean energy demand for sustained economic expansion. Policymakers should focus on the inclusion of environmental policy stringency in any future environment strategy.

摘要

本文考察了影子经济和环境政策力度对中国 1993 年至 2019 年期间能源消费和经济增长的影响。非对称 ARDL 实证结果表明,影子经济和环境政策力度的正向冲击对能源消费和经济增长具有长期显著的正向影响。然而,在长期内,影子经济的负向冲击对能源消费和经济增长产生了积极且显著的影响,但与正向冲击相比,其影响幅度较小。长期来看,环境政策力度的负向冲击对能源消费和经济增长没有显著影响。中国应将环境政策力度作为经济工具,以保持绿色经济增长和清洁能源需求,促进经济持续扩张。政策制定者应注重将环境政策力度纳入未来的环境战略中。

相似文献

1
Re-evaluating the dynamic role of shadow economy and environmental policy stringency in the energy-growth nexus in China.重新评估中国影子经济和环境政策严格程度在能源-增长关系中的动态作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):17406-17416. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16967-9. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
Analyzing the role of environmental technologies and environmental policy stringency on green growth in China.分析环境技术和环境政策力度在中国绿色增长中的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):55630-55638. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19673-2. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Asymmetric determinants of CO emissions in China: do government size and economic size matter?中国 CO 排放的非对称决定因素:政府规模和经济规模重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):47225-47232. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19096-z. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Education and its impact on renewable energy demand, carbon intensity, and green growth: do digital financial inclusion and environmental policy stringency matter in China.教育及其对可再生能源需求、碳强度和绿色增长的影响:数字金融包容性和环境政策严格性在中国是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):12020-12028. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22759-6. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
The shadow economy in South Asia: dynamic effects on clean energy consumption and environmental pollution.南亚的影子经济:对清洁能源消费和环境污染的动态影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29265-29275. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12690-7. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
Examining the role of non-economic factors in energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China: policy options for the green economy.探讨非经济因素在中国能源消费和二氧化碳排放中的作用:绿色经济的政策选择。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(47):67667-67676. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15359-3. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
The influence of shadow economy, environmental policies and geopolitical risk on renewable energy: A comparison of high- and middle-income countries.影子经济、环境政策和地缘政治风险对可再生能源的影响:高收入和中等收入国家的比较。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Sep 15;342:118122. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118122. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty and environmental policy stringency on environmental quality: evidence from China and the United States.经济政策不确定性和环境政策严格程度对环境质量的非对称影响:来自中国和美国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):29996-30016. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24082-6. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
9
Revealing the effectiveness of environmental policy stringency and environmental law on environmental performance: does asymmetry matter?揭示环境政策严格程度和环境法对环境绩效的有效性:非对称性是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(60):91190-91200. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21992-3. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan.巴基斯坦清洁能源与环境质量关系的非对称性分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):20736-20747. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08372-5. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Eco-Innovation and Its Influence on Renewable Energy Demand: The Role of Environmental Law.生态创新及其对可再生能源需求的影响:环境法的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 11;20(4):3194. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043194.
2
Revival of sun-and-beach tourism through the lens of regulatory and risk dimensions of environmental sustainability.从环境可持续性的监管和风险维度视角看阳光沙滩旅游的复兴
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 4;8(10):e10893. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10893. eCollection 2022 Oct.