• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层抽样下差异或比值效应参数的 MOVER 置信区间。

MOVER confidence intervals for a difference or ratio effect parameter under stratified sampling.

机构信息

Department of Biometrics, Grifols, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2022 Jan 15;41(1):194-207. doi: 10.1002/sim.9230. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9230
PMID:34672008
Abstract

Stratification is commonly employed in clinical trials to reduce the chance covariate imbalances and increase the precision of the treatment effect estimate. We propose a general framework for constructing the confidence interval (CI) for a difference or ratio effect parameter under stratified sampling by the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER). We consider the additive variance and additive CI approaches for the difference, in which either the CI for the weighted difference, or the CI for the weighted effect in each group, or the variance for the weighted difference is calculated as the weighted sum of the corresponding stratum-specific statistics. The CI for the ratio is derived by the Fieller and log-ratio methods. The weights can be random quantities under the assumption of a constant effect across strata, but this assumption is not needed for fixed weights. These methods can be easily applied to different endpoints in that they require only the point estimate, CI, and variance estimate for the measure of interest in each group across strata. The methods are illustrated with two real examples. In one example, we derive the MOVER CIs for the risk difference and risk ratio for binary outcomes. In the other example, we compare the restricted mean survival time and milestone survival in stratified analysis of time-to-event outcomes. Simulations show that the proposed MOVER CIs generally outperform the standard large sample CIs, and that the additive CI approach performs better than the additive variance approach. Sample SAS code is provided in the Supplementary Material.

摘要

分层通常用于临床试验中,以减少协变量不均衡的机会,并提高治疗效果估计的精度。我们提出了一种通过方差估计恢复(MOVER)方法对分层抽样下的差异或比值效应参数构建置信区间(CI)的一般框架。我们考虑了差异的加性方差和加性 CI 方法,其中要么计算加权差的 CI,要么计算每个组中加权效应的 CI,要么计算加权差的方差作为相应分层特定统计量的加权和。比值的 CI 通过 Fieller 和对数比值方法得出。在假设各层之间效应不变的情况下,权重可以是随机的,但对于固定权重,不需要此假设。这些方法可以轻松应用于不同的终点,因为它们仅需要在每个组中跨层对感兴趣的度量的点估计、CI 和方差估计。通过两个真实示例来说明这些方法。在一个示例中,我们为二项结局的风险差和风险比导出了 MOVER CI。在另一个示例中,我们在时间事件结局的分层分析中比较了受限平均生存时间和里程碑生存。模拟表明,所提出的 MOVER CI 通常优于标准大样本 CI,并且加性 CI 方法优于加性方差方法。示例 SAS 代码在补充材料中提供。

相似文献

1
MOVER confidence intervals for a difference or ratio effect parameter under stratified sampling.分层抽样下差异或比值效应参数的 MOVER 置信区间。
Stat Med. 2022 Jan 15;41(1):194-207. doi: 10.1002/sim.9230. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
MOVER-R and Penalized MOVER-R Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Two Quantities.用于两个量之比的MOVER-R和惩罚MOVER-R置信区间
Am Stat. 2023;77(4):381-389. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2173294. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
Some new confidence intervals for Kaplan-Meier based estimators from one and two sample survival data.基于单样本和双样本生存数据的 Kaplan-Meier 估计量的一些新置信区间。
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 15;40(23):4961-4976. doi: 10.1002/sim.9105. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.使用逻辑回归和倾向评分分层法估计边缘比值比的估计值和置信区间。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):760-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3811.
5
Construction of confidence intervals for the risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data.具有相关双侧数据的分层设计中风险差异置信区间的构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):446-467. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579222. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.分层泊松抽样下共同率比的八个区间估计量。
Stat Med. 2004 Apr 30;23(8):1283-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.1725.
7
Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data.Jackknife 经验似然置信区间在稀有二项事件数据分析中的异质性评估。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106440. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106440. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.荟萃分析中优势比的研究间方差和总效应的估计方法。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):426-442. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1404. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
Applications of Monte Carlo Simulation in Modelling of Biochemical Processes蒙特卡罗模拟在生化过程建模中的应用
10
Hazard ratio inference in stratified clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and limited sample size.具有事件发生时间终点和有限样本量的分层临床试验中的风险比推断。
Pharm Stat. 2019 May;18(3):366-376. doi: 10.1002/pst.1928. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty and Stress Urinary Incontinence: Bayesian Network and Discrete Mathematical Approach Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005-2018 Data.衰弱与压力性尿失禁:使用2005 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据的贝叶斯网络和离散数学方法
Cureus. 2025 Mar 16;17(3):e80650. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80650. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
MOVER-R and Penalized MOVER-R Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Two Quantities.用于两个量之比的MOVER-R和惩罚MOVER-R置信区间
Am Stat. 2023;77(4):381-389. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2173294. Epub 2023 Feb 14.