• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗吉尼亚州结直肠癌结局和社会经济因素的空间分析。

Spatial analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes and socioeconomic factors in Virginia.

机构信息

University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):1908. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11875-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11875-6
PMID:34674672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8529747/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) disparities vary by country and population group, but often have spatial features. This study of the United States state of Virginia assessed CRC outcomes, and identified demographic, socioeconomic and healthcare access contributors to CRC disparities.

METHODS

County- and city-level cross-sectional data for 2011-2015 CRC incidence, mortality, and mortality-incidence ratio (MIR) were analyzed for geographically determined clusters (hotspots and cold spots) and their correlates. Spatial regression examined predictors including proportion of African American (AA) residents, rural-urban status, socioeconomic (SES) index, CRC screening rate, and densities of primary care providers (PCP) and gastroenterologists. Stationarity, which assesses spatial equality, was examined with geographically weighted regression.

RESULTS

For incidence, one CRC hotspot and two cold spots were identified, including one large hotspot for MIR in southwest Virginia. In the spatial distribution of mortality, no clusters were found. Rurality and AA population were most associated with incidence. SES index, rurality, and PCP density were associated with spatial distribution of mortality. SES index and rurality were associated with MIR. Local coefficients indicated stronger associations of predictor variables in the southwestern region.

CONCLUSIONS

Rurality, low SES, and racial distribution were important predictors of CRC incidence, mortality, and MIR. Regions with concentrations of one or more factors of disparities face additional hurdles to improving CRC outcomes. A large cluster of high MIR in southwest Virginia region requires further investigation to improve early cancer detection and support survivorship. Spatial analysis can identify high-disparity populations and be used to inform targeted cancer control programming.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)的差异因国家和人群群体而异,但通常具有空间特征。这项对美国弗吉尼亚州的研究评估了 CRC 的结果,并确定了导致 CRC 差异的人口统计学、社会经济和医疗保健获取因素。

方法

对 2011-2015 年 CRC 发病率、死亡率和死亡率-发病率比(MIR)的县和城市水平的横断面数据进行了分析,以确定地理上确定的聚类(热点和冷点)及其相关性。空间回归分析了包括非裔美国人(AA)居民比例、城乡状况、社会经济(SES)指数、CRC 筛查率以及初级保健提供者(PCP)和胃肠病学家密度在内的预测因子。通过地理加权回归评估了评估空间均等性的平稳性。

结果

对于发病率,确定了一个 CRC 热点和两个冷点,包括弗吉尼亚州西南部一个大的 MIR 热点。在死亡率的空间分布中,未发现聚类。农村地区和 AA 人口与发病率最相关。SES 指数、农村地区和 PCP 密度与死亡率的空间分布相关。SES 指数和农村地区与 MIR 相关。局部系数表明,在西南部地区,预测变量的相关性更强。

结论

农村地区、低 SES 和种族分布是 CRC 发病率、死亡率和 MIR 的重要预测因素。存在一个或多个差异因素的集中区域在改善 CRC 结果方面面临额外的障碍。弗吉尼亚州西南部地区一个 MIR 高的大型聚类需要进一步调查,以改善早期癌症检测并支持生存。空间分析可以识别高差异人群,并用于为有针对性的癌症控制规划提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/8b4933f06b04/12889_2021_11875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/6122e67eb651/12889_2021_11875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/63ecd4be69f0/12889_2021_11875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/8b4933f06b04/12889_2021_11875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/6122e67eb651/12889_2021_11875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/63ecd4be69f0/12889_2021_11875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8c/8529747/8b4933f06b04/12889_2021_11875_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes and socioeconomic factors in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州结直肠癌结局和社会经济因素的空间分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):1908. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11875-6.
2
Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008-2016.2008-2016 年北卡罗来纳州东部结直肠癌高发地区特定分期的发病率和死亡率的种族和地域差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar;32(3):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01381-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Does Rurality Play a Role?结直肠癌筛查的预测因素:农村地区是否起作用?
J Rural Health. 2015 Summer;31(3):254-68. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12104. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
5
Racial Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the Mississippi Delta Region.密西西比三角洲地区的种族居住隔离与结直肠癌死亡率。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Feb 18;18:E14. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200483.
6
Examining determinants of geographic variation in colorectal cancer mortality in North Carolina: A spatial analysis approach.检测北卡罗来纳州结直肠癌死亡率地理变异的决定因素:空间分析方法。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;59:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
The impact of preventive screening resource distribution on geographic and population-based disparities in colorectal cancer in Mississippi.预防性筛查资源分配对密西西比州结直肠癌的地理和人群差异的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 8;8:423. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1352-0.
8
Counties eliminating racial disparities in colorectal cancer mortality.消除结直肠癌死亡率种族差异的县。
Cancer. 2016 Jun 1;122(11):1735-48. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29958. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
Temporal Trends in Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Patients, 1973-2010.1973-2010 年,医疗保险患者中结直肠癌的地理和社会人口统计学差异的时间趋势。
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):361-370. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12209. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Disparities in colorectal cancer mortality for rural populations in the United States: Does screening matter?美国农村地区结直肠癌死亡率的差异:筛查是否重要?
Am J Surg. 2020 Jun;219(6):988-992. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.027. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes: investigating the impact of place-specific factors using causal inference methods for spatial data.结直肠癌结局的空间分析:使用空间数据因果推断方法研究特定地点因素的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 Aug 29;47(3):446-453. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf044.
2
Difficulties and Disparities in Colorectal Cancer End-of-Life Care: A Patient's Story.结直肠癌临终关怀中的困难与差异:一个患者的故事
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Apr 29;38(1):74-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786393. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Vulnerability in Colorectal Cancer: Adjusted Gross Income and Geography as Factors in Determining Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Study Across a Broad Income Inequality in an American Context.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal Cancer: In the Pursuit of Health Equity.结直肠癌:追求健康公平。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Mar;41:108-117. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_321071.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Trends in the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in a brazilian city.巴西某城市结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率趋势
结直肠癌的脆弱性:调整后的总收入和地理位置作为决定结直肠癌总体生存的因素:一项在美国背景下跨越广泛收入不平等的单中心研究。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 3;31(12):7754-7764. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31120570.
4
Spatial patterns of colorectal cancer survival rates in Malaysia, 2013-2018.2013 - 2018年马来西亚结直肠癌生存率的空间模式
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Apr;36(4):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01945-6. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
5
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Black Men in Virginia: Development of an mHealth Intervention.弗吉尼亚州提高黑人男性结直肠癌筛查率:开发移动医疗干预措施。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 10;8:e50028. doi: 10.2196/50028.
6
Patients' experiences with 'sludge' (administrative burden) in the cancer screening process and its relationship with screening completion, experience and health system distrust.患者在癌症筛查过程中对“ sludge ”(行政负担)的体验及其与筛查完成情况、体验和对卫生系统不信任的关系。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Sep 18;12(Suppl 2):e002933. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002933.
7
Mortality rate and predictors of colorectal cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚结直肠癌患者的死亡率及其预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12597-9.
8
Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit.大都市底特律的地区社会经济劣势与癌症生存
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):387-397. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0738.
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Dec 9;13(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05411-9.
4
Spatio-temporal mapping of breast and prostate cancers in South Iran from 2014 to 2017.2014 年至 2017 年伊朗南部地区乳腺癌和前列腺癌的时空分布。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1170. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07674-8.
5
Colorectal cancer risk factors in north-eastern Iran: A retrospective cross-sectional study based on geographical information systems, spatial autocorrelation and regression analysis.伊朗东北部的结直肠癌风险因素:一项基于地理信息系统、空间自相关和回归分析的回顾性横断面研究。
Geospat Health. 2019 Nov 6;14(2). doi: 10.4081/gh.2019.793.
6
Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.农村癌症控制中的多层次分析:概念框架与方法学意义。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105835. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies.全球结直肠癌负担:趋势、风险因素和预防策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;16(12):713-732. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Determination of effective factors on geographic distribution of the incidence of colorectal cancer in Tehran using geographically weighted Poisson regression model.使用地理加权泊松回归模型确定德黑兰结直肠癌发病率地理分布的影响因素
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Mar 27;33:23. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.23. eCollection 2019.
9
The Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio Is Not a Valid Proxy for Cancer Survival.死亡率与发病率之比并非癌症生存率的有效替代指标。
J Glob Oncol. 2019 May;5:1-9. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00038.
10
Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Availability: Lessons From Southwest Virginia.肺癌筛查可及性的差异:来自弗吉尼亚州西南部的经验教训。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):412-416. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Apr 2.