• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Pandemic: Effect on Confidence Levels of Portuguese Towards People of Different Professions.新冠疫情:对葡萄牙人对不同职业人群信心水平的影响
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 4;14:4141-4148. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S310608. eCollection 2021.
2
Trends in trust of professional groups in Portugal during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间葡萄牙民众对专业群体信任度的变化趋势。
J Public Health Policy. 2023 Sep;44(3):489-498. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00430-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
5
Professional Relationship Between Physicians and Journalists in Bangladesh: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study.孟加拉国医生与记者之间的职业关系:基于网络的横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Jul 10;12:e44116. doi: 10.2196/44116.
6
Mental capacity legislation and communication disability: A cross-sectional survey exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of specialist decision-making support by UK SLTs.精神能力立法和沟通障碍:一项横断面调查,旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对英国言语治疗师提供专业决策支持的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12685. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Mental Health Burden in Different Professions During the Final Stage of the COVID-19 Lockdown in China: Cross-sectional Survey Study.中国新冠疫情封锁末期不同职业的心理健康负担:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24240. doi: 10.2196/24240.
8
Exploring the relationship between working from home, mental and physical health and wellbeing: a systematic review.探索在家工作、身心健康和幸福感之间的关系:系统综述。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 May;11(4):1-100. doi: 10.3310/AHFF6175.
9
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature.信任与新冠疫情:信任的后果及对信任而言的后果是什么?文献的早期综述
Polit Stud Rev. 2021 May;19(2):274-285. doi: 10.1177/1478929920948684.
2
Health and economic measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic- Effect on street vendors.应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生和经济措施对街头小贩的影响。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021 Mar 7;15(2):198-203. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13465.
3
Between Conspiracy Beliefs, Ingroup Bias, and System Justification: How People Use Defense Strategies to Cope With the Threat of COVID-19.在阴谋论信念、内群体偏见和系统正当化之间:人们如何运用防御策略应对新冠疫情的威胁。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:578586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578586. eCollection 2020.
4
Examining persuasive message type to encourage staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic and social lockdown: A randomized controlled study in Japan.研究在新冠疫情和社会封锁期间鼓励居家的说服性信息类型:日本的一项随机对照研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug 21;103(12):2588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.016.
5
The Cummings effect: politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic.卡明斯效应:新冠疫情期间的政治、信任与行为
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):464-465. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31690-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Managing the coronavirus pandemic in Portugal: A step-by-step adjustment of health and social services.葡萄牙对冠状病毒大流行的管理:卫生和社会服务的逐步调整。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):536-538. doi: 10.1037/tra0000879. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review.冠状病毒大流行(COVID-19)的社会经济影响:综述。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Risk perceptions and health behavior.风险认知与健康行为。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2015 Oct 1;5:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012.

新冠疫情:对葡萄牙人对不同职业人群信心水平的影响

COVID-19 Pandemic: Effect on Confidence Levels of Portuguese Towards People of Different Professions.

作者信息

Ricou Miguel, Pereira Tiago, Pereira Helena P, Picoli Ricardo, Marina Sílvia

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health of the Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Cintesis-Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 4;14:4141-4148. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S310608. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S310608
PMID:34675708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8500488/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic is emerging in a world where science is highly developed. Nevertheless, science is not the only resource that people resort to when they have difficulties. In this pandemic context, some professions became more relevant, including front-line professionals, such as medical doctors and nurses, and those who may have an indirect role. The aim of this study is to understand whether there is a strengthening of people's confidence, in politicians, journalists, science-based activities, and in more mystical dimensions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out to understand the levels of confidence of the Portuguese population in several professional groups, measured in two pandemic moments. Participants were recruited to participate in the study through online platforms. The sample was randomly collected from the Portuguese population. The sample was composed of 1455 Portuguese people with a mean age of 44 years, and 1080 were female.

RESULTS

We found high levels of confidence in medical doctors and nurses, as well as in other health professions, science, and education. We detected the opposite trend for politicians and journalists. Measured in two pandemic moments, we found confidence levels in these professionals were lower in September than in July with statistical significance differences [(politicians (t = 3.15, p = 0.00); journalists (t = 2.49, p = 0.01)].

CONCLUSION

It is important to improve a joint action between politicians, journalists, health and science professionals to communicate measures to increase confidence from people. There is a need for the engagement of the population in the adoption of protective measures and contribute to easier control in pandemic situations.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情在科学高度发达的世界中出现。然而,科学并非人们遇到困难时唯一求助的资源。在这种疫情背景下,一些职业变得更加重要,包括一线专业人员,如医生和护士,以及那些可能发挥间接作用的人员。本研究的目的是了解人们对政治家、记者、基于科学的活动以及更神秘层面的信心是否增强。

方法

开展了一项横断面研究,以了解葡萄牙民众在两个疫情阶段对几个职业群体的信心水平。通过在线平台招募参与者参与研究。样本从葡萄牙民众中随机抽取。样本由1455名葡萄牙人组成,平均年龄44岁,其中1080人为女性。

结果

我们发现民众对医生、护士以及其他卫生职业、科学和教育的信心水平较高。而对政治家和记者则呈现相反趋势。在两个疫情阶段进行测量时,我们发现民众对这些职业的信心水平在9月低于7月,且具有统计学显著差异[(政治家(t = 3.15,p = 0.00);记者(t = 2.49,p = 0.01)]。

结论

政治家、记者、卫生和科学专业人员之间加强联合行动以传达措施从而增强民众信心非常重要。需要民众参与采取防护措施,并有助于在疫情形势下更轻松地进行管控。