• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病的克罗格 - 波尔森测试的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric Evaluation of the Krogh-Poulsen Test for the Diagnosis of the Temporomandibular Disorders.

作者信息

Ibáñez-Vera Alfonso Javier, Alonso-Royo Roger, Sánchez-Torrelo Carmen María, Zagalaz-Anula Noelia, López-Collantes Jesús, Lomas-Vega Rafael

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Campus de las Lagunillas, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.

FisioMedic Clinic, Dos Hermanas, 41701 Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;11(10):1876. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101876.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11101876
PMID:34679574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8534852/
Abstract

The Krogh-Poulsen Test is a classic instrument to measure dysfunction of the stomatognathic system whose psychometric properties are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Krogh-Poulsen Test for the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). A cross-sectional study was designed, including 119 patients (63 patients with TMD and 56 healthy controls). Factorial validity, inter-rater reliability, error of measurement, diagnostic validity of the Krogh-Poulsen Test, and concurrent validity were analyzed. The Krogh-Poulsen Test showed a three-factor structure. The inter-rater agreement could be considered very good with a kappa index of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.90) and Standard Error of Measurement of 0.79. Correlations were strong with other orofacial instruments, moderate with instruments measuring TMD-related disorders such as neck pain, headache, or dizziness, and poor with generic quality of life instruments. The Area Under the Curve ROC was 0.928 showing, for a cut-off point >1, a sensitivity of 90.48 (95% CI 80.4-96.4) and a specificity of 85.71 (95% CI 73.8-93.6) for the diagnosis of TMD disorders. The Krogh-Poulsen Test showed a three-factor structure, very good inter-rater reliability, a strong correlation with other orofacial instruments, and an excellent capacity to discriminate between patients with or without TMD.

摘要

克罗格 - 波尔森测试是一种用于测量口颌系统功能障碍的经典工具,但其心理测量特性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估克罗格 - 波尔森测试在颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)诊断中的心理测量特性。设计了一项横断面研究,纳入119名患者(63名TMD患者和56名健康对照)。分析了克罗格 - 波尔森测试的因子效度、评分者间信度、测量误差、诊断效度和同时效度。克罗格 - 波尔森测试呈现出三因素结构。评分者间一致性可认为非常好,kappa指数为0.87(95%CI 0.83 - 0.90),测量标准误为0.79。与其他口腔颌面部工具的相关性很强,与测量TMD相关疾病(如颈部疼痛、头痛或头晕)的工具相关性中等,与一般生活质量工具的相关性较差。曲线下面积(ROC)为0.928,对于截断点>1,诊断TMD疾病的灵敏度为90.48(95%CI 80.4 - 96.4),特异度为85.71(95%CI 73.8 - 93.6)。克罗格 - 波尔森测试呈现出三因素结构,评分者间信度非常好,与其他口腔颌面部工具相关性很强,并且在区分有无TMD患者方面具有出色的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e243/8534852/87740521219b/diagnostics-11-01876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e243/8534852/a5983fd4ea97/diagnostics-11-01876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e243/8534852/87740521219b/diagnostics-11-01876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e243/8534852/a5983fd4ea97/diagnostics-11-01876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e243/8534852/87740521219b/diagnostics-11-01876-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the Krogh-Poulsen Test for the Diagnosis of the Temporomandibular Disorders.用于诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病的克罗格 - 波尔森测试的心理测量学评估。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;11(10):1876. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101876.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders.用于诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病的赫尔基莫临床功能障碍指数的效度和信度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;11(3):472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030472.
3
The Short Form of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for the Screening of Temporomandibular Disorders: Validity and Reliability in a Spanish-Speaking Population.用于颞下颌关节紊乱病筛查的丰塞卡记忆指数简表:在讲西班牙语人群中的效度和信度
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 14;10(24):5858. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245858.
4
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
5
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index in a Spanish Population with Temporomandibular Disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱症西班牙人群中丰塞卡既往症指数的跨文化调适与验证
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 9;9(10):3230. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103230.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of the German Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI).跨文化调适与心理计量评估的德国颅面疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI)。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E857-E866.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其版颅面部疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI/T) 为颞下颌关节紊乱的个体。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Feb;45(3):523-533. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2028909. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Development and Validation of the Epidemiological Diagnostic Instrument for Temporomandibular Disorders.《颞下颌关节紊乱病流行病学诊断工具的研制与验证》
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Dec;51(12):2548-2558. doi: 10.1111/joor.13853. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
Temporomandibular disorders among Brazilian adolescents: reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire.巴西青少年的颞下颌关节紊乱症:一份筛查问卷的信效度
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):314-22. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130694.
10
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. IV: evaluation of psychometric properties of the Axis II measures.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。IV:轴II测量的心理测量特性评估。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):48-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.干针疗法与手法治疗在肌筋膜性颞下颌关节紊乱症中的疗效比较:一项单盲随机对照试验
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):1415. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091415.
2
Effectiveness of Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction and the Relationship with Cervical Spine.物理治疗在颞下颌关节紊乱症治疗中的有效性及其与颈椎的关系
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 17;10(11):2962. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112962.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders.用于诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病的赫尔基莫临床功能障碍指数的效度和信度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;11(3):472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030472.
2
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index in a Spanish Population with Temporomandibular Disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱症西班牙人群中丰塞卡既往症指数的跨文化调适与验证
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 9;9(10):3230. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103230.
3
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
评估探索性项目因子分析中因子解和因子得分估计的质量与适宜性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
The Utility and Construct Validity of Four Measures of Pain Intensity: Results from a University-Based Study in Spain.四种疼痛强度测量方法的效用与结构效度:来自西班牙一项大学研究的结果
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2411-2420. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny319.
5
An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.有序数据线性加权kappa系数的另一种解释。
Psychometrika. 2018 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9621-1.
6
Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in women.分析短程 Fonseca 病史指数在女性肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断中的准确性和可靠性。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Temporomandibular disorder: otologic implications and its relationship to sleep bruxism.颞下颌关节紊乱:耳科学方面的影响及其与睡眠磨牙症的关系。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep-Oct;84(5):614-619. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Risk factor modifications and depression incidence: a 4-year longitudinal Canadian cohort of the Montreal Catchment Area Study.风险因素修正与抑郁症发病率:加拿大蒙特利尔集水区研究的一项为期4年的纵向队列研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 10;7(6):e015156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015156.
9
Factor and Rasch analysis of the Fonseca anamnestic index for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder.Fonseca 病史指数用于肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断的因子和 Rasch 分析。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
Analysis of Helkimo index for temporomandibular disorder diagnosis in the dental students of Faridabad city: A cross-sectional study.法里达巴德市牙科学生颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断的赫尔基莫指数分析:一项横断面研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.194941.