Health Leads, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 24;21(1):1933. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11981-5.
Addressing social risks in the clinical setting can increase patient confidence in the availability of community resources and may contribute to the development of a therapeutic alliance which has been correlated with treatment adherence and improved quality of life in mental health contexts. It is not well understood what barriers patients face when trying to connect to community resources that help address social risks. This paper aims to describe patient-reported barriers to accessing and using social needs-related resources to which they are referred by a program embedded in a safety net primary care clinic.
This is a qualitative assessment of patient-reported barriers to accessing and using social needs assistance programs. We conducted over 100 in-depth interviews with individuals in Northern California who participated in a navigation and referral program to help address their social needs and describe a unique framework for understanding how policies and systems intersect with an individual's personal life circumstances.
Individuals described two distinct domains of barriers: 1) systems-level barriers that were linked to the inequitable distribution of and access to resources, and 2) personal-level barriers that focused on unique limitations experienced by each patient and impacted the way that they accessed services in their communities. While these barriers often overlapped or manifested in similar outcomes, this distinction was key because the systems barriers were not things that individuals could control or overcome through their own initiative or by increasing individual capacity.
Respondents describe intersecting systemic and personal barriers that compound patients' challenges to getting their social needs met; this includes both a picture of the inequitable distribution of and access to social services and a profile of the limitations created by individual life histories. These results speak to the need for structural changes to improve adequacy, availability, and accessibility of social needs resources. These findings highlight the need for advocacy to address systems barriers, especially the stigma that is faced by people who struggle with a variety of health and social issues, and investment in incentives to strengthen relationships between health care settings and social service agencies.
在临床环境中解决社会风险可以增加患者对社区资源可用性的信心,并有助于建立治疗联盟,而治疗联盟与心理健康背景下的治疗依从性和提高生活质量相关。目前尚不清楚患者在尝试连接到帮助解决社会风险的社区资源时面临哪些障碍。本文旨在描述患者在获取和使用他们通过一个嵌入在初级保健诊所中的安全网计划所转介的与社会需求相关的资源时所报告的障碍。
这是对患者获取和使用社会需求援助计划时所报告的障碍的定性评估。我们对加利福尼亚州北部的 100 多名个人进行了深入访谈,这些人参加了一个导航和转介计划,以帮助他们满足社会需求,并描述了一个独特的框架,用于了解政策和系统如何与个人的个人生活环境相交。
个人描述了两个不同的障碍领域:1)系统层面的障碍,这些障碍与资源的不平等分配和获取有关,2)个人层面的障碍,这些障碍集中在每个患者所经历的独特限制上,并影响了他们在社区中获取服务的方式。虽然这些障碍经常重叠或表现出相似的结果,但这种区别很关键,因为系统障碍不是个人可以通过自己的主动行动或通过增加个人能力来控制或克服的。
受访者描述了相互交织的系统和个人障碍,这些障碍加剧了患者满足社会需求的挑战;这包括社会服务分配和获取不平等的情况,以及个人生活史造成的限制情况。这些结果表明需要进行结构性变革,以改善社会需求资源的充足性、可及性和可及性。这些发现突显了需要倡导解决系统障碍的必要性,特别是那些与各种健康和社会问题作斗争的人所面临的耻辱感,并需要投资激励措施来加强医疗保健环境和社会服务机构之间的关系。