Allchin Douglas
Minnesota Center for the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(6):1475-1492. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
Ironically, flat-Earthers, anti-vaxxers, and climate change naysayers trust in science. Unfortunately, they trust the science. That conundrum lies at the heart of scientific literacy in an age of well-funded commercial and ideological interests and overwhelming digital information. The core question for the citizen-consumer is not philosophically "why trust science?" (Oreskes 2019) but sociologically "who speaks for science?" Teachers can help students learn how to navigate the treacherous territory of inevitably mediated communication and the vulnerabilities of epistemic dependence. Students need to understand the role of science communication practices (media literacy) and the roles of credibility, expertise and honesty and the deceptive strategies used by imitators of science to seem like credible voices for science.
具有讽刺意味的是,地平论者、反疫苗者和气候变化怀疑论者都信任科学。不幸的是,他们信任的是伪科学。在一个商业利益和意识形态利益资金雄厚且数字信息泛滥的时代,这个难题正是科学素养的核心所在。对于公民消费者来说,核心问题并非哲学层面的“为何要信任科学?”(奥雷斯克斯,2019年),而是社会学层面的“谁为科学发声?”教师可以帮助学生学习如何在不可避免的媒介传播的危险领域中导航,以及认识到认知依赖的脆弱性。学生需要理解科学传播实践(媒介素养)的作用,以及可信度、专业知识和诚实的作用,还有科学模仿者为了看似成为科学的可信声音而使用的欺骗策略。