Suppr超能文献

谁为科学代言?

Who Speaks for Science?

作者信息

Allchin Douglas

机构信息

Minnesota Center for the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.

出版信息

Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(6):1475-1492. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

Abstract

Ironically, flat-Earthers, anti-vaxxers, and climate change naysayers trust in science. Unfortunately, they trust the science. That conundrum lies at the heart of scientific literacy in an age of well-funded commercial and ideological interests and overwhelming digital information. The core question for the citizen-consumer is not philosophically "why trust science?" (Oreskes 2019) but sociologically "who speaks for science?" Teachers can help students learn how to navigate the treacherous territory of inevitably mediated communication and the vulnerabilities of epistemic dependence. Students need to understand the role of science communication practices (media literacy) and the roles of credibility, expertise and honesty and the deceptive strategies used by imitators of science to seem like credible voices for science.

摘要

具有讽刺意味的是,地平论者、反疫苗者和气候变化怀疑论者都信任科学。不幸的是,他们信任的是伪科学。在一个商业利益和意识形态利益资金雄厚且数字信息泛滥的时代,这个难题正是科学素养的核心所在。对于公民消费者来说,核心问题并非哲学层面的“为何要信任科学?”(奥雷斯克斯,2019年),而是社会学层面的“谁为科学发声?”教师可以帮助学生学习如何在不可避免的媒介传播的危险领域中导航,以及认识到认知依赖的脆弱性。学生需要理解科学传播实践(媒介素养)的作用,以及可信度、专业知识和诚实的作用,还有科学模仿者为了看似成为科学的可信声音而使用的欺骗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8520088/1316b882e123/11191_2021_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验