• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践社群:职业健康与安全检查员合作学习的一种方法。

The Community of Practice: A Method for Cooperative Learning of Occupational Health and Safety Inspectors.

作者信息

Gilardi Luisella, Marino Maurizio, Fubini Lidia, Bena Antonella, Ferro Elisa, Santoro Silvano, Tosco Eleonora, Pasqualini Osvaldo

机构信息

Documentation Centre for Health Promotion, Local Health Authority TO3, Grugliasco, 10095 Torino, Italy.

Epidemiology Department, Local Health Authority TO3, Grugliasco, 10095 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Oct 12;11(4):1254-1268. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040091.

DOI:10.3390/ejihpe11040091
PMID:34698169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8544705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workplace injuries in Italy still occur despite laws and safety norms. We need to understand the causes rooted in the context and social conditions, and need to improve the practice of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) inspectors of the Workplace Safety and Prevention Services (WSPS) of the Italian regional health boards. The aims of this study were to describe the setting up of a Community of Practice (CoP) for the production of best practices for injury prevention and to evaluate the motivation of OSH inspectors for participating in the CoP and the effects of CoP participation on their professional practice.

METHODS

Two workplace injury stories underwent peer review during each CoP meeting. We evaluated the CoP using a focus group and a questionnaire.

RESULT

Between 2014 and 2021, the CoP met in 18 workshops. Over the 8-year period, the CoP grew from 20 to 150 participants. Overall, 30 stories underwent peer review and were published on the institutional website. The focus group participants stated that the reasons why they participated in the CoP were the need to share experience and to tackle new challenges.

CONCLUSION

The CoP was found to be useful for improving professional practice by strengthening professional identity and contributing to the production of new knowledge.

摘要

背景

尽管有相关法律和安全规范,但意大利的工作场所伤害仍时有发生。我们需要了解其背后的根源及社会状况,并需要改进意大利地区卫生局工作场所安全与预防服务部门(WSPS)职业安全与健康(OSH)检查员的工作实践。本研究的目的是描述为预防伤害制定最佳实践而设立的实践社区(CoP),并评估OSH检查员参与CoP的动机以及参与CoP对其专业实践的影响。

方法

在每次CoP会议期间,对两个工作场所伤害案例进行同行评审。我们通过焦点小组和问卷调查对CoP进行评估。

结果

2014年至2021年期间,CoP共召开了18次研讨会。在这8年期间,CoP的参与者从20人增加到150人。总体而言,30个案例经过同行评审并在机构网站上发布。焦点小组参与者表示,他们参与CoP的原因是需要分享经验和应对新挑战。

结论

实践证明,CoP通过强化职业认同感和促进新知识的产生,有助于改进专业实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8313/8544705/9c80ec1d1719/ejihpe-11-00091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8313/8544705/72b755dec65d/ejihpe-11-00091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8313/8544705/9c80ec1d1719/ejihpe-11-00091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8313/8544705/72b755dec65d/ejihpe-11-00091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8313/8544705/9c80ec1d1719/ejihpe-11-00091-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Community of Practice: A Method for Cooperative Learning of Occupational Health and Safety Inspectors.实践社群:职业健康与安全检查员合作学习的一种方法。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Oct 12;11(4):1254-1268. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040091.
2
[The community of practice as a place of prevention: the value of collective knowledge in occupational safety].[作为预防场所的实践社群:集体知识在职业安全中的价值]
Med Lav. 2017 Jun 28;108(3):222-227. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6239.
3
Injury narratives in occupational safety and health prevention in Italy.意大利职业安全与健康预防中的伤害叙述。
Occup Med (Lond). 2019 Dec 7;69(7):500-503. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz135.
4
The experience of a nationwide Community of Practice to set up Regional Prevention Plans in Italy.意大利一个全国性实践社区制定区域预防计划的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 27;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0226-4.
5
An evaluation of the effects of the occupational safety and health inspectors' supervision in workplaces.对职业安全与健康检查员在工作场所进行监督的效果评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jul;68:139-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
Introducing a multimedia course to enhance health professionals' skills to facilitate communities of practice.引入多媒体课程,提高卫生专业人员的技能,以促进实践社区。
J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(4):477-94. doi: 10.1108/jhom-09-2012-0164.
7
Evaluating an online occupational therapy community of practice and its role in supporting occupational therapy practice.评估一个在线职业治疗实践社区及其在支持职业治疗实践中的作用。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2011 Oct;58(5):337-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00954.x.
8
Investigation into qualitative discourses of the occupational safety and health inspectors in order to promote enforcement.对职业安全与健康检查员的定性话语进行调查,以促进执法。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(4):426-39. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1096062.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Med Lav. 2016 May 26;107(3):178-90.
10
'Closing the gap'--a partnership approach to community care education for long term conditions.“缩小差距”-一种针对长期疾病的社区护理教育的伙伴关系方法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Oct;32(7):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Community of Practice for Nursing: connecting nurses in the Region of the Americas.护理实践共同体:连接美洲区域的护士。
2
Scaling up a Positive Safety Culture among Construction Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Ghana.在加纳的建筑中小企业中扩大积极的安全文化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 22;21(7):817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070817.
3
Introduction to The Special Issue "Safety Training Effectiveness: A Research Agenda".《特刊“安全培训效果:一项研究议程”》引言

本文引用的文献

1
Injury narratives in occupational safety and health prevention in Italy.意大利职业安全与健康预防中的伤害叙述。
Occup Med (Lond). 2019 Dec 7;69(7):500-503. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz135.
2
Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers.预防建筑工人受伤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 5;2(2):CD006251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006251.pub4.
3
[The community of practice as a place of prevention: the value of collective knowledge in occupational safety].[作为预防场所的实践社群:集体知识在职业安全中的价值]
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Oct 19;12(10):1518-1520. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12100106.
Med Lav. 2017 Jun 28;108(3):222-227. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6239.
4
Evaluating communities of practice and knowledge networks: a systematic scoping review of evaluation frameworks.评估实践社区和知识网络:评估框架的系统综述
Ecohealth. 2014 Sep;11(3):383-99. doi: 10.1007/s10393-014-0958-3. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
5
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries.预防职业病和工伤的职业安全与健康执法工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD010183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010183.pub2.
6
Evaluation of a nationally funded state-based programme to reduce fatal occupational injuries.评价一个国家资助的基于州的项目,以减少致命的职业伤害。
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Nov;69(11):810-4. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100213. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training.职业健康与安全培训效果的系统评价。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 May;38(3):193-208. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3259. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature.实践社区是如何以及为何在医疗保健领域建立的?文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 14;11:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-273.
9
The marriage of evidence and narrative: scientific nurturance within clinical practice.证据与叙事的结合:临床实践中的科学培育
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):585-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01551.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
10
Using stories to battle unintentional injuries: narratives in safety and health communication.用故事对抗非故意伤害:安全与健康传播中的叙事。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 12.