Gilardi Luisella, Marino Maurizio, Fubini Lidia, Pasqualini Osvaldo, Ferro Elisa, Santoro Silvano, Tosco Eleonora, Bena Antonella, Coffano Maria Elena
Centro di Documentazione per la Promozione della Salute SC a DU Servizio di Epidemiologia, ASL TO3 -Regione Piemonte.
Med Lav. 2017 Jun 28;108(3):222-227. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6239.
Occupational Health and Safety (OSH) inspectors of the Health Units of Piedmont Region wrote 47 case histories based on data gathered from injury investigations as part of the project "From the injury investigation reports to case histories: creation of a collection of case histories on occupational injuries". Afterwards a Community of Practice (CoP) was initiated with the aim of sharing recommendations for prevention of occupational injuries.
The aims of the article are: 1) to describe the implementation process of the CoP; 2) to evaluate the benefits of CoP regarding the improvement of professional practice of OSH inspectors.
Two injury case histories were peer reviewed during each meeting of the CoP. A focus group was set up to evaluate benefits of CoP. Seven OSH inspectors participated in this focus group.
Eight CoP meetings were organized and about 70 OSH inspectors participated. Fourteen stories were peer reviewed and eight were published on www.dors.it. Operators involved in the focus groups reported that the main reasons for participation in the CoP were the need to compare and tackle new challenges. The criticalities are tied to the turnover of the participants and to the lack of recognition by management. Most of the operators felt it was too early to include professionals such as Workers' Safety Representatives and Prevention and Safety Service Managers in the CoP due to their different professional roles.
OSH inspectors reported professional benefits of CoP experience. We believe that this approach might be transferred, integrated and developed in other regions and included in the next national prevention plan.
作为“从伤害调查报告到案例史：创建职业伤害案例史集”项目的一部分，皮埃蒙特地区卫生单位的职业健康与安全（OSH）检查员根据伤害调查收集的数据撰写了47个案例史。之后启动了一个实践社区（CoP），旨在分享预防职业伤害的建议。
本文的目的是：1）描述CoP的实施过程；2）评估CoP对改善OSH检查员专业实践的益处。
在CoP的每次会议上对两个伤害案例史进行同行评审。设立了一个焦点小组来评估CoP的益处。七名OSH检查员参加了这个焦点小组。
组织了八次CoP会议，约70名OSH检查员参加。对14个案例进行了同行评审，其中8个在www.dors.it上发表。参与焦点小组的人员报告说，参与CoP的主要原因是需要进行比较并应对新挑战。关键问题与参与者的人员更替以及管理层缺乏认可有关。由于职业角色不同，大多数人员认为现在将工人安全代表以及预防和安全服务经理等专业人员纳入CoP还为时过早。
OSH检查员报告了CoP经验带来的专业益处。我们认为这种方法可以在其他地区推广、整合和发展，并纳入下一个国家预防计划。
