• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济合作与发展组织国家烟草控制措施评估:基于数据包络分析的比较研究

Evaluation of Tobacco Control Measures in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries: A Comparative Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis.

作者信息

Safaei Lari Majid, Raei Behzad, Nourizadeh Tehrani Pedram, Takian Amirhossein

机构信息

Department of Health Management, Policy, and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Health Sci. 2021 Sep 5;21(3):e00527. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.62.

DOI:10.34172/jrhs.2021.62
PMID:34698661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8957682/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to measure the efficiency and productivity of tobacco control policies across 16 selected Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 2008 to 2014.

STUDY DESIGN

A panel-data study.

METHODS

Data envelopment analysis was used in this study. Taxation on tobacco products and pictorial warning labels were chosen as the inputs. Percentage of the population of daily smokers above 15 years old and the number of cigarettes used per smoker per day were output variables. Additionally, the Malmquist total factor productivity (TFP) was used to analyze the panel data and measure productivity change and technical efficiency changes over time.

RESULTS

The highest technical efficiency score (1.05) was attributed to Norway, while the lowest (0.91) belonged to the UK. Technological change with a total mean of 1.06 implied that the technology and creativity have increased, while countries have been able to promote their creativity over the studied period. Norway with the TFP score of 1.15 was the most productive country, while the UK and Turkey with TFP scores of 0.95 and 0.98, respectively, were the least productive countries in terms of the implementation of the tobacco control policies.

CONCLUSION

Most OECD countries have productively implemented tax and pictorial warning policies to reduce tobacco use. To achieve the optimum outcome of the tobacco control policies and overcome the challenges of smoking use, countries need to tackle the difficult underlying factors, i.e. tobacco industry opposition and lobbyists, smuggling, and low socioeconomic status.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在衡量2008年至2014年期间16个经合组织(OECD)选定国家烟草控制政策的效率和生产力。

研究设计

一项面板数据研究。

方法

本研究采用数据包络分析。烟草制品税收和图片警示标签被选为投入。15岁以上每日吸烟者在总人口中的百分比以及每位吸烟者每天的卷烟使用量为产出变量。此外,使用Malmquist全要素生产率(TFP)分析面板数据,并衡量随时间推移的生产率变化和技术效率变化。

结果

最高技术效率得分(1.05)归因于挪威,而最低得分(0.91)属于英国。总均值为1.06的技术变革表明技术和创造力有所提高,并且在研究期间各国能够提升其创造力。TFP得分为1.15的挪威是最具生产力的国家,而就烟草控制政策的实施而言,TFP得分分别为0.95和0.98的英国和土耳其是生产力最低的国家。

结论

大多数经合组织国家已有效实施税收和图片警示政策以减少烟草使用。为实现烟草控制政策的最佳效果并克服吸烟使用的挑战,各国需要应对潜在的困难因素,即烟草行业的反对和游说者、走私以及社会经济地位低下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ba/8957682/40af33f9fdf2/jrhs-21-e00527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ba/8957682/40af33f9fdf2/jrhs-21-e00527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ba/8957682/40af33f9fdf2/jrhs-21-e00527-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Tobacco Control Measures in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries: A Comparative Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis.经济合作与发展组织国家烟草控制措施评估:基于数据包络分析的比较研究
J Res Health Sci. 2021 Sep 5;21(3):e00527. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.62.
2
Tobacco excise tax increase and illicit cigarette consumption: evidence from Vietnam.提高烟草消费税与非法香烟消费:来自越南的证据。
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s275-s280. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055301. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Tobacco tax evasion in Western Balkan countries: tax evasion prevalence and evasion determinants.西巴尔干国家的烟草逃税问题:逃税的普遍性和逃税的决定因素。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s80-s87. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056879. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Keeping smoking affordable in higher tax environments via smoking thinner roll-your-own cigarettes: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey 2006-15.在高税收环境下通过吸食更薄的自卷香烟来保持吸烟的廉价性:2006-2015 年国际烟草控制四国调查的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
5
Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.在土耳其谁缴纳的香烟税最多。
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051639. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Price Policy and Taxation as Effective Strategies for Tobacco Control.价格政策和税收作为控烟的有效策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;10:851740. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.851740. eCollection 2022.
7
How smokers may react to cigarette taxes and price increases in Brazil: data from a national survey.巴西吸烟者对香烟税和价格上涨可能会作何反应:来自一项全国性调查的数据。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 8;14:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-327.
8
Global Implementation of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures Specified in Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.《框架公约》中规定的减少烟草需求措施的全球实施情况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):503-510. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab216.
9
Tobacco taxation, illegal cigarette supply and geography: findings from the ITC Uruguay Surveys.烟草税、非法香烟供应与地理位置:来自乌拉圭调查的 ITC 研究结果。
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(Suppl 1):s53-s60. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054218. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
10
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.吸烟及降低吸烟率的经济影响:证据综述
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy and its effects on Neural Tube Defects.孕期母亲吸烟及其对神经管缺陷的影响。
Iran J Child Neurol. 2024 Summer;18(3):103-115. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v18i3.41499. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Cigarette Smoking and Its Financial Burden among Iranian Households: Evidence from Household Income and Expenditures Survey.伊朗家庭的吸烟状况及其经济负担:来自家庭收入和支出调查的证据。
J Res Health Sci. 2020 Oct 13;20(4):e00494. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.28.
2
Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约头十年的影响:为影响评估专家组编写的全球证据审查
Tob Control. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):s119-s128. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054389. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Distributional benefits of tobacco tax and smoke-free workplaces in China: A modeling study.
中国烟草税与无烟工作场所的分配效益:一项建模研究。
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020701. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020701.
4
Global challenges in tobacco control.
Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5-7. doi: 10.21149/8076.
5
Global economic cost of smoking-attributable diseases.全球吸烟相关疾病经济负担。
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):58-64. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053305. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
6
Tobacco Control Progress in Low and Middle Income Countries in Comparison to High Income Countries.与高收入国家相比,低收入和中等收入国家的烟草控制进展
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;13(10):1039. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13101039.
7
Pricing Policies And Control of Tobacco in Europe (PPACTE) project: cross-national comparison of smoking prevalence in 18 European countries.欧洲烟草定价政策与控制(PPACTE)项目:18个欧洲国家吸烟率的跨国比较
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014 May;23(3):177-85. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000009.
8
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟起始、戒烟和流行率的影响:系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
9
Out of sight, out of mind? Removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Norway.眼不见,心不烦?挪威取消烟草销售点展示。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e37-42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050341. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.烟草制品健康警示语:综述。
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):327-37. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.037630. Epub 2011 May 23.