Suppr超能文献

阻力训练男性中较大的中心动脉僵硬度对心迷走神经压力反射敏感性的影响。

Effects of Greater Central Arterial Stiffness on Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity in Resistance-Trained Men.

作者信息

Nakamura Nobuhiro, Muraoka Isao

机构信息

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.

Faculty of Commerce, Yokohama College of Commerce, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2021 Oct 26;7(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00367-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared with age-matched untrained men, resistance-trained men who have undergone long duration training (> 2 years) at a high frequency (> 5 days/week) may be lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) because of central arterial stiffening. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men on cardiovagal BRS in a cross-sectional study to compare resistance-trained men with age-matched untrained men.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included resistance-trained men (n = 20; age: 22 ± 3; body mass index: 26.7 ± 2.2) and age-matched untrained men (control group: n = 20; age: 25 ± 2; body mass index: 23.7 ± 2.4). The β-stiffness index and arterial compliance were assessed at the right carotid artery using a combination of a brightness mode ultrasonography system for the carotid artery diameter and applanation tonometry for the carotid blood pressure. And, the cardiovagal BRS was estimated by the slope of the R-R interval and systolic blood pressure during Phase II and IV of Valsalva maneuver (VM). The participants maintained an expiratory mouth pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 s in the supine position.

RESULTS

The β-Stiffness index was significantly higher in the resistance-trained group than in the control group (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.4 ± 1.0 a.u., P < 0.01). In contrast, the resistance-trained group had significantly lower arterial compliance (0.15 ± 0.05 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04 mm/mmHg, P < 0.01) and cardiovagal BRS during Phase IV of VM (9.0 ± 2.5 vs. 12.9 ± 5.4 ms/mmHg, P < 0.01) than the control group and. Moreover, cardiovagal BRS during Phase IV of VM was inversely and positively correlated with the β-stiffness index (r = - 0.59, P < 0.01) and arterial compliance (r = 0.64, P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Resistance-trained group had greater central arterial stiffness and lower cardiovagal BRS Phase IV compared with control group. Moreover, the central arterial stiffening was related to cardiovagal BRS Phase IV. These results suggest that greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. Trial Registration University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) in Japan, UMIN000038116. Registered on September 27, 2019.

摘要

背景

与年龄匹配的未经训练的男性相比,经过长时间(>2年)、高频(>5天/周)训练的抗阻训练男性可能由于中心动脉僵硬而具有较低的心血管迷走性压力反射敏感性(BRS)。因此,本研究的目的是在一项横断面研究中,比较抗阻训练男性与年龄匹配的未经训练男性,以检验抗阻训练男性中心动脉僵硬程度增加对心血管迷走性BRS的影响。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了抗阻训练男性(n = 20;年龄:22±3;体重指数:26.7±2.2)和年龄匹配的未经训练男性(对照组:n = 20;年龄:25±2;体重指数:23.7±2.4)。使用用于测量颈动脉直径的亮度模式超声系统和用于测量颈动脉血压的压平式眼压计组合,在右侧颈动脉评估β-僵硬指数和动脉顺应性。并且,通过瓦尔萨尔瓦动作(VM)的II期和IV期期间R-R间期与收缩压的斜率来估计心血管迷走性BRS。参与者在仰卧位保持40 mmHg的呼气口腔压力15秒。

结果

抗阻训练组的β-僵硬指数显著高于对照组(5.9±1.4 vs. 4.4±1.0任意单位,P < 0.01)。相比之下,抗阻训练组的动脉顺应性(0.15±0.05 vs. 0.20±0.04 mm/mmHg,P < 0.01)以及VM IV期的心血管迷走性BRS(9.0±2.5 vs. 12.9±5.4 ms/mmHg,P < 0.01)均显著低于对照组。此外,VM IV期的心血管迷走性BRS分别与β-僵硬指数(r = -0.59,P < 0.01)和动脉顺应性(r = 0.64,P < 0.01)呈负相关和正相关。

结论

与对照组相比,抗阻训练组具有更大的中心动脉僵硬程度和更低的心血管迷走性BRS IV期。此外,中心动脉僵硬与心血管迷走性BRS IV期相关。这些结果表明,抗阻训练男性更大的中心动脉僵硬程度可能与更低的心血管迷走性BRS有关。试验注册 日本大学医院医学信息网络(UMIN),UMIN000038116。于2019年9月27日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4705/8548489/4653f019f9d0/40798_2021_367_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验