Suppr超能文献

[QUIKS在保守治疗的肿瘤住院患者中的适用性]

[Applicability of QUIKS in conservatively treated tumor inpatients].

作者信息

Roch Carmen, Kress Theresa, Erlenwein Joachim, Meissner Winfried, Brede Elmar Marc, van Oorschot Birgitt

机构信息

Interdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2022 Oct;36(5):342-349. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00599-6. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement in conservative pain management (QUIKS), a module for nonoperative patients in the QUIPS project was tested on a cohort of tumor patients regarding its applicability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conservatively treated inpatients at the University Hospital of Würzburg (UKW) were prospectively surveyed on the quality of pain management using the QUIKS outcome questionnaire (AZ 129/17, Ethics Committee at UKW). Information on therapy and demographics was taken from the hospital's internal documentation system.

RESULTS

During the data collection period 100 conservatively treated inhouse tumor patients from different hospitals were included. Of the patients 74% required assistance in answering the questionnaire. Functional limitations or pain treatment-related side effects were present in 77% of the patients; the average pain level was 6 on the numerical rating scale. The most commonly reported type of pain was back pain and headache. Of the patients 18% received pain therapy with opioids and 26% with nonopioids, adjustment was made in 5% with opioids and in 44% with nonopioids and pain medicine specialists were consulted in 9% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The application of the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients but required a high level of assistance in completing it. A high level of pain was observed during the hospital stay and the adjustment of pain therapy or the involvement of pain medicine specialists was rare. The interpretation of statements regarding the quality of tumor pain may be limited as other (pre-existing) pain entities, such as nontumor-associated pain or chronic tumor pain could not be clearly delineated.

摘要

背景

保守性疼痛管理质量改进(QUIKS)是QUIPS项目中针对非手术患者的一个模块,已在一组肿瘤患者中对其适用性进行了测试。

材料与方法

对维尔茨堡大学医院(UKW)接受保守治疗的住院患者,使用QUIKS结果问卷(UKW伦理委员会批准号AZ 129/17)对疼痛管理质量进行前瞻性调查。治疗和人口统计学信息取自医院内部文档系统。

结果

在数据收集期间,纳入了来自不同医院的100例接受保守治疗的住院肿瘤患者。其中74%的患者在回答问卷时需要帮助。77%的患者存在功能受限或与疼痛治疗相关的副作用;数字评分量表上的平均疼痛水平为6。最常报告的疼痛类型是背痛和头痛。18%的患者接受了阿片类药物疼痛治疗,26%的患者接受了非阿片类药物治疗,5%的阿片类药物治疗患者和44%的非阿片类药物治疗患者进行了调整,9%的病例咨询了疼痛医学专家。

结论

该问卷的应用得到了患者的良好接受,但完成问卷需要高水平的帮助。住院期间观察到患者疼痛程度较高,而疼痛治疗的调整或疼痛医学专家的参与很少。由于无法明确区分其他(既往存在的)疼痛实体,如非肿瘤相关疼痛或慢性肿瘤疼痛,关于肿瘤疼痛质量的陈述的解释可能会受到限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/9512755/fd1041a33317/482_2021_599_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验