Faculty of Health School of Psychology, Centre for Social, Early and Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences & Centre for Sport Research, Deakin University, VIC, Geelong Campus, Geelong, Australia.
Prev Sci. 2022 Jan;23(1):36-47. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01310-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Despite a decline in Australian adolescents reporting to have consumed alcohol, a high proportion of the adolescent population still consumes alcohol. Community-led prevention interventions that systematically and strategically implement evidence-based programs have been shown to be effective in producing population-behaviour change related to youth alcohol and drug use. This study evaluated the post-intervention effects of a multi-component community intervention in Australia. It comprised social marketing targeting adolescents and parents, and a community intervention to reduce underage alcohol sales. Structural equation modelling was used to examine direct and indirect effects of community intervention components on intention and consumption. Self-report surveys (N = 3377) and community sales data (27 communities) were analysed to evaluate the effect of the intervention components on intention and consumption before the age of 18. The intervention reduced alcohol sales to minors (OR = .82). Exposure to the social marketing was significantly associated with household no-alcohol rules (OR = 2.24) and parents not supplying alcohol (OR = .72). The intervention predicted intention not to consume alcohol before age 18; intention was associated with not consuming alcohol (OR = 5.70). Total indirect effects from the intervention through to intention were significant. However, parents setting a rule and not supplying alcohol were the only significant direct effects to intention. Parents setting a rule was directly associated with lower consumption. Overall, the intervention logic was supported by the data modelling. The study extends prior knowledge of community-based interventions to prevent adolescent alcohol use by identifying critical intervention components and effect mechanisms. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ACTRN12612000384853.
尽管澳大利亚青少年报告饮酒量有所下降,但仍有很大一部分青少年饮酒。社区主导的预防干预措施,通过系统和战略性地实施基于证据的计划,已被证明在产生与青少年饮酒和吸毒相关的人口行为变化方面是有效的。本研究评估了澳大利亚一项多组分社区干预的干预后效果。该干预措施包括针对青少年和家长的社会营销,以及减少未成年饮酒销售的社区干预。结构方程模型用于检验社区干预措施对意图和消费的直接和间接影响。自我报告调查(N = 3377)和社区销售数据(27 个社区)用于评估干预措施对 18 岁以下意图和消费的影响。该干预措施减少了未成年人的饮酒销售(OR =.82)。接触社会营销与家庭禁酒规定(OR = 2.24)和父母不提供酒精(OR =.72)显著相关。该干预措施预测了 18 岁之前不饮酒的意图;意图与不饮酒有关(OR = 5.70)。通过干预措施到达意图的总间接效应是显著的。然而,父母制定规则和不提供酒精是意图的唯一显著直接影响因素。父母制定规则与较低的消费直接相关。总的来说,数据建模支持了干预的逻辑。这项研究通过确定关键的干预措施和作用机制,扩展了预防青少年饮酒的基于社区的干预措施的现有知识。临床试验注册号:ACTRN12612000384853。