• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究课程中合作伙伴的评估:一门由患者和研究人员共同创建的课程,旨在培养以患者为导向的研究能力。

Evaluation of the partners in research course: a patient and researcher co-created course to build capacity in patient-oriented research.

作者信息

Courvoisier Melissa, Baddeliyanage Richelle, Wilhelm Linda, Bayliss Lorraine, Straus Sharon E, Fahim Christine

机构信息

myBlueprint, 310 Davenport Rd, Toronto, ON, M5R 1K6, Canada.

Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00316-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00316-8
PMID:34717764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, patient-oriented research (POR) has been at the forefront of healthcare research in Canada because it has the potential to make research more meaningful and relevant to patient needs. Despite this growing emphasis on and expectation to conduct POR, there is limited guidance about how to apply POR in practice. To address this capacity building need, the Knowledge Translation (KT) Program and patient partners co-designed, delivered, and evaluated Partners in Research (PiR), a 2-month online course for patients and researchers to collectively learn how to conduct and engage in POR.

METHODS

PiR was delivered to 4 cohorts of patients and researchers between 2017 and 2018. For each cohort, we evaluated the impact of the course on participants' knowledge, self-efficacy, intentions, and use of POR using surveys at 3 time points: baseline, post-course and 6-months post-course. We also monitored the process of course design and delivery by assessing implementation quality of the PiR course. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with course format, course materials, quality of delivery and their level of engagement via a 7-point Likert scale in the post-course survey.

RESULTS

A total of 151 participants enrolled in the PiR course throughout the 4 cohorts. Of these, 49 patients and 33 researchers (n = 82 participants) consented to participate in the course evaluation. Process and outcome evaluations collected over a 9-month period indicated that participation in the PiR course increased knowledge of POR concepts for patients (p < .001) and for researchers (p < .001) from pre-course to post-course timepoints. Likewise, self-efficacy to engage in POR increased from baseline to post-course for both patients (p < .001) and researchers (p < .001). Moreover, participants reported high levels of satisfaction with content, delivery and interactive components of the course.

CONCLUSIONS

The PiR course increased capacity in POR for both researchers and patients. This work enhances our understanding of how to design useful and engaging education opportunities to increase patient and researcher capacity in POR.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,以患者为导向的研究(POR)一直处于加拿大医疗保健研究的前沿,因为它有可能使研究更有意义且与患者需求相关。尽管对开展POR的重视和期望日益增加,但关于如何在实践中应用POR的指导却很有限。为满足这种能力建设需求,知识转化(KT)项目与患者合作伙伴共同设计、提供并评估了研究伙伴计划(PiR),这是一个为期两个月的在线课程,面向患者和研究人员,旨在共同学习如何开展和参与POR。

方法

2017年至2018年期间,PiR面向4组患者和研究人员授课。对于每组人员,我们在3个时间点(基线、课程结束后和课程结束6个月后)通过调查评估该课程对参与者关于POR的知识、自我效能感、意图及应用的影响。我们还通过评估PiR课程的实施质量来监测课程设计和授课过程。在课程结束后的调查中,要求参与者通过7点李克特量表对课程形式、课程材料、授课质量及参与程度进行满意度评分。

结果

4组人员中共有151名参与者报名参加了PiR课程。其中,49名患者和33名研究人员(共82名参与者)同意参加课程评估。在9个月期间收集的过程和结果评估表明,从课程前到课程后,参与PiR课程提高了患者(p <.001)和研究人员(p <.001)对POR概念的了解。同样,患者(p <.001)和研究人员(p <.001)参与POR的自我效能感从基线到课程后都有所提高。此外,参与者对课程内容、授课和互动环节的满意度很高。

结论

PiR课程提高了研究人员和患者开展POR的能力。这项工作增进了我们对如何设计有用且引人入胜的教育机会以提高患者和研究人员开展POR能力的理解。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the partners in research course: a patient and researcher co-created course to build capacity in patient-oriented research.研究课程中合作伙伴的评估:一门由患者和研究人员共同创建的课程,旨在培养以患者为导向的研究能力。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00316-8.
2
Development, implementation, and scalability of the Family Engagement in Research Course: a novel online course for family partners and researchers in neurodevelopmental disability and child health.研究中的家庭参与课程的开发、实施与可扩展性:面向神经发育障碍和儿童健康领域家庭伙伴及研究人员的新型在线课程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 5;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00615-w.
3
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
4
Engaging diverse patients in a diverse world: the development and preliminary evaluation of educational modules to support diversity in patient engagement research.在多元世界中吸引不同患者参与:支持患者参与研究多元化的教育模块的开发与初步评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 7;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00455-0.
5
Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.针对囊性纤维化群体的虚拟以患者为中心的结局研究培训项目的开发与评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00328-4.
6
Delivery and evaluation of simulations to promote authentic and meaningful engagement in childhood disability research.提供和评估模拟,以促进在儿童残疾研究中进行真实且有意义的参与。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 18;9(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00468-9.
7
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.面向研究人员、患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者的健康领域以患者为导向的研究能力(PORCH):一项范围综述的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 10;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluation of an integrated knowledge translation approach used for updating the Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids: a pre-post mixed methods study.用于更新《Cochrane患者决策辅助工具综述》的综合知识转化方法的评估:一项前后对比的混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00550-w.
9
Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course.加强以患者为导向的研究培训:参与者对一门在线课程的看法
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 6;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00629-4.
10
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.一项支持患者参与初级卫生保健研究的培训计划:协同设计、实施与评估研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jun 5;17:e65485. doi: 10.2196/65485.
2
Bridging the gap: empowering patients as research partners through a structured training program.缩小差距:通过结构化培训项目赋予患者作为研究伙伴的权力。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 5;11(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00685-4.
3
Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course.加强以患者为导向的研究培训:参与者对一门在线课程的看法
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 6;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00629-4.
4
Benefits, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in health research: combining evidence-based and youth perspectives.青年参与健康研究的益处、障碍及建议:结合循证观点与青年视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00607-w.
5
Development, implementation, and scalability of the Family Engagement in Research Course: a novel online course for family partners and researchers in neurodevelopmental disability and child health.研究中的家庭参与课程的开发、实施与可扩展性:面向神经发育障碍和儿童健康领域家庭伙伴及研究人员的新型在线课程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 5;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00615-w.
6
Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.健康研究中成功合作的关键要素:患者研究伙伴的观点
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00590-2.
7
Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study.研究患者参与如何影响研究:一项混合方法研究。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):379-395. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00685-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
9
Training and capacity development in patient-oriented research: Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit (OSSU) initiatives.以患者为导向的研究中的培训与能力发展:安大略省战略卫生研究基金支持单位(OSSU)的举措。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Feb 25;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00415-8.
10
Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research.共同设计模拟并分析过程,以确定儿童残疾研究中真实且有意义的研究参与原则。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 9;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour.运用交叉性视角审视理论领域框架:一种思考交叉社会身份和权力结构如何影响行为的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01056-1.
2
Effective involvement: a report on the evaluation of a research awareness training package for public involvement in health research.有效参与:关于公众参与健康研究的研究意识培训包评估报告
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jun 13;5:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0151-5. eCollection 2019.
3
Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada.在加拿大共同构建以患者为导向的研究课程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 11;5:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7. eCollection 2019.
4
How to engage patients in research and quality improvement in community-based primary care settings: protocol for a participatory action research pilot study.如何让患者参与社区基层医疗环境中的研究和质量改进:一项参与式行动研究试点研究方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 1;4:30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0113-3. eCollection 2018.
5
More than just ticking a box…how patient and public involvement improved the research design and funding application for a project to evaluate a cycling intervention for hip osteoarthritis.不仅仅是打勾……患者和公众参与如何改进了一项评估髋骨关节炎骑行干预项目的研究设计和资金申请。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Nov 27;1:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0013-8. eCollection 2015.
6
How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices.我们应当如何以及为何让家长作为共同研究者参与健康研究?对当前实践做法的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):543-554. doi: 10.1111/hex.12490. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
Authentic Engagement Of Patients And Communities Can Transform Research, Practice, And Policy.患者和社区的真正参与能够改变研究、实践和政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):590-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1512.
8
Community of inquiry model: advancing distance learning in nurse anesthesia education.探究共同体模式:推进麻醉护士教育中的远程学习
AANA J. 2014 Jun;82(3):212-8.
9
Development of a simple 12-item theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development on clinical behavioral intentions.开发一种简单的基于理论的 12 项工具,以评估继续专业发展对临床行为意向的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091013. eCollection 2014.
10
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.